ORGANIC
LETTERS
2009
Vol. 11, No. 21
4814-4817
Stereoselective Synthesis of
2,6-syn-Dimethyl-tetrahydropyran
Derivatives, Important Segments of
Marine Polycyclic Ethers, by Unique
Insertion of the Methyl Group
Michihiro Maemoto, Atsushi Kimishima, and Tadashi Nakata*
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Tokyo UniVersity of Science, 1-3
Kagurazaka, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan
Received August 8, 2009
ABSTRACT
Treatment of 6-methyl-tetrahydropyran derivatives, which have a 1′-mesyloxy group at the C2-side chain, with Me3Al effected stereoselective
insertion of a methyl group at the C2-position to give 2,6-syn-dimethyl-tetrahydropyran derivatives. This reaction proceeds via removal of the
mesyloxy group, 1,2-hydride shift, and stereoselective insertion of a methyl group into the resulting oxonium ion.
Since the isolation of brevetoxin-B as a red tide toxin, many
marine polycyclic ethers, such as gambierol and maitotoxin,
have been reported.1 They have a unique trans-fused
polycyclic ether ring system and exhibit potent biological
activities, including neurotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and antiviral
activities. Their synthetically challenging structures and
potent bioactivities have attracted the attention of numerous
synthetic organic chemists.2 The marine natural products
often contain cyclic ethers having a C2-methyl group as an
angular methyl group, such as 2-methyl-tetrahydropyran.
Thus, synthetic methods for cyclic ethers including 2-methyl-
tetrahydropyran structures have been extensively investi-
gated.3 Furthermore, 2,6-syn-dimethyl-tetrahydropyran de-
rivatives are also important segments, being present, for
example, in the F-ring of brevetoxin-B, the B-ring of
gambierol, and the W-, Z-, and E′-rings of maitotoxin (Figure
1). However, there are only a few reports on synthetic
methods applicable to 2,6-syn-dimethyl-tetrahydropyran de-
rivatives, that is, 6-endo-cyclization of hydroxy vinyl epoxide
by Nicolaou et al.,3c Claisen rearrangement of allyl enol ether
(1) For reviews on polycyclic ethers, see: (a) Yasumoto, T.; Murata,
M. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 1897. (b) Shimizu, Y. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 1685.
(c) Murata, M.; Yasumoto, T. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2000, 17, 293. (d) Yasumoto,
T. Chem. Rec. 2001, 1, 228. (e) Deranas, A, H.; Norte, M.; Ferna´ndez, J. J.
Toxicon 2001, 39, 1101.
(3) Selected papers: (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Prasad, C. V. C.; Hwang, C.-
K.; Duggan, M. E.; Veale, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5321. (b)
Nicolaou, K. C.; Prasad, C. V. C.; Somers, P. K.; Hwang, C.-K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5330. (c) Nicolaou, K. C.; Nugiel, D. A.;
Couladouros, E.; Hwang, C.-K. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 4517. (d) Mori, Y.;
Furuta, H.; Takase, T.; Mitsuoka, S.; Furukawa, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 8019. (e) Rainier, J. D.; Allwein, S. P. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5310.
(f) Rainier, J. D.; Allwein, S. P.; Cox, J. M. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 231. (g)
Majumder, U.; Cox, J. M.; Johnson, H. W. B.; Rainier, J. D. Chem.sEur.
J. 2006, 12, 1736. (h) Matsuo, G.; Matsukura, H.; Hori, N.; Nakata, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7673. (i) Suzuki, K.; Matsukura, H.; Matsuo,
G.; Koshino, H.; Nakata, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8653. See also
ref 2.
(2) For reviews on synthetic methods and total syntheses, see: (a)
Alvarez, E.; Candenas, M.-L.; Pe´rez, R.; Ravelo, J.; Mart´ın, J. D. Chem.
ReV. 1995, 95, 1953. (b) Fujiwara, K.; Hayashi, N.; Tokiwano, T.; Murai,
A. Heterocycles 1999, 50, 561. (c) Mori, Y. Chem.sEur. J. 1997, 3, 849.
(d) Marmsa¨ter, F. P.; West, F. G. Chem.sEur. J. 2002, 8, 4347. (e) Inoue,
M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 1811. (f) Fujiwara, K.; Murai, A. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2004, 77, 2129. (g) Sasaki, M.; Fuwa, H. Synlett 2004, 2,
1811. (h) Kadota, I.; Yamamoto, Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 423. (i)
Inoue, M. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 4379. (j) Nakata, T. Chem. ReV. 2005,
105, 4314. (k) Clark, J. S. Chem. Commun. 2006, 3571. (l) Nicolaou, K. C.;
Frederick, M. O.; Aversa, R. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7182.
10.1021/ol9018419 CCC: $40.75
Published on Web 10/07/2009
2009 American Chemical Society