J.-M. Noh et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 5586–5589
5589
pH value became higher than that of the free acid form. This was
References and notes
expected from our group’s previous work.16 To compare their stor-
1. Parvez, S.; Kang, M.; Chung, H.-S.; Cho, C.; Hong, M.-C.; Shin, M.-K.; Bae, H.
Phytother. Res. 2006, 20, 921.
2. Parvez, S.; Kang, M.; Chung, H.-S.; Bae, H. Phytother. Res. 2007, 21, 805.
3. Kim, Y. M.; Yun, J.; Lee, C.-K.; Lee, H.; Min, K. R.; Kim, Y. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 18,
16340.
4. Battaini, G.; Monzani, E.; Casella, L.; Lonardi, E.; Tepper, A. W. J. W.; Canters, G.
W.; Bubacco, L. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 47, 44606.
5. Kahn, V.; Ben-Shalom, N.; Zakin, V. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 4460.
6. Burdock, G. A.; Soni, M. G.; Carabin, I. G. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2001,
33, 80.
7. Schurink, M.; Van Berkel, W. J. H.; Wichers, H. J.; Boeriu, C. G. Peptides 2007, 28,
485.
8. Chen, J. S.; Wei, C.-I.; Marshall, M. R. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1991, 11, 1897.
9. Marguerite, F.; Horowitz, N. H.; Heinemann, S. F. J. Biol. Chem. 1963, 238,
2045.
age stability, KA and KA-F-NH2 were stored at 50 °C as solution
state (20 lM, in DI water), and their inhibition activities were mea-
sured periodically. The tyrosinase inhibitory activity of KA was de-
creased from 18% to 8% in 3 days, however that of KA-F-NH2 was
not changed. We imagine that the aromatic side chain residues
make KA-F-NH2 be piled up and eventually lead to lower its solu-
bility. And the lowered solubility might prevent it from fast oxida-
tion in water. Actually, KA-F-NH2 is less soluble than KA. As turned
out in Figure 4, the tyrosinase inhibitory activity of KA was sharply
decreased, whereas that of KA-F-NH2 was well maintained even
after 3 months.
As mentioned before, when amino acids having an aromatic
ring structure at the side chain were conjugated to KA, its tyrosi-
nase inhibitory activity was enhanced to over 90%. We suggest that
the aromatic ring structure may contribute to the binding of the
inhibitor to the hydrophobic pocket of the enzyme near the binu-
clear copper active site. Recently, the crystallographic structure
of tyrosinase has been revealed. The three-dimensional structure
of tyrosinase enables us to gain a better understanding of the
tyrosinase inhibition mechanism. Although the structure of mush-
room tyrosinase was not determined yet, we can borrow the crys-
tallographic data because there is a high homology for the active
center of most tyrosinase from different origin.25–27 To ascertain
the importance of the aromatic ring structure of KA-AA-NH2, we
docked KA-AA-NH2 into the active site of tyrosinase using the AUTO-
DOCK Tools program. According to the docking calculations, KA-AA-
NH2 having an aromatic ring structure emitted a higher free energy
after docking to the active site of tyrosinase and, in this way, low
energy levels were achieved.28 We also found that quite a few
hydrophobic amino acids were located around the copper active
site of tyrosinase. From these data, we confirmed that there existed
hydrophobic interactions between the aromatic rings of KA-F-NH2
and the hydrophobic side chains in the tyrosinase active site, and
these interactions blocked the accessibility of the substrate to the
active site. For example, the aromatic side chain of KA-F-NH2 and
KA-W-NH2 might interact with the hydrophobic pocket around
His63, His216, and Phe59 surrounding the binuclear copper active
site of tyrosinase. In the case of KA-Y-NH2, the phenol ring might
interact with His216, Phe66, and Trp254 (Fig. 5). Because of these
interactions, we can conclude that KA-AA-NH2, which has an aro-
matic ring structure at the side chain, exhibits much higher tyros-
inase inhibitory activity than KA.
10. Kobayashi, Y.; Kayahara, H.; Tadasa, K.; Tanaka, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
1996, 12, 1303.
11. Kadokawa, J.; Nisikura, T.; Muraoka, R.; Tagaya, H.; Fukuoka, N. Synth. Commun.
2003, 7, 1081.
12. Nishimura, T.; Kometani, T.; Takii, H.; Terada, Y.; Shigetaka, O. J. Ferment.
Bioeng. 1994, 1, 37.
13. O’Brien, G.; Patterson, J. M.; Meadow, J. R. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 1711.
14. Kobayashi, Y.; Kayahara, H.; Tadasa, K.; Nakamura, T.; Tanaka, H. Biosci.,
Biotechnol., Biochem. 1995, 9, 1745.
15. Kim, H.; Choi, J.; Cho, J. K.; Kim, S. Y.; Lee, Y. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14,
2843.
16. Noh, J. M.; Kwak, S. Y.; Kim, D. H.; Lee, Y. S. Biopolymers 2007, 2, 300.
17. Kojic acid (5 g, 35 mmol) was dissolved in THF (100 mL). After stirring for 1 h,
with N2 purging, CDI (5.1 g, 0.9 equiv) in THF (50 mL) was added, and the
mixture stirred for 24 h at room temperature. A white solid powder was
filtered and dried. Yield: 75%; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz, d): 9.34 (1H, s, –
OH), 8.33 (1H, s, N–CH@N), 8.13 (1H, s, –CH–O), 7.67 (1H, s, imidazole), 7.10
(1H, s, imidazole), 6.66 (1H, s, CH–C@O), 5.30 (2H, s, CH2–O). N-Fmoc-amino
acid (2 equiv), in NMP, was quantitatively introduced to the Rink amide AM
SUREÒ resin (0.76 mmol/g) using the general protocol of BOP-mediated solid
phase Fmoc/tBu strategy. After removing Fmoc group, activated kojic acid
(2 equiv) was added and shaken for 6 h. Finally, the resin was treated with 30%
TFA/DMC for 1 h, and filtered. The crude product in the filtrate was
concentrated and precipitated with cold diethyl ether.
KA-F-NH2 (5-hydroxy-4-oxo-4H-pyran-2-yl)methyl-1-amino-1-oxo-3-phenyl-
propan-2-ylcarbamate); White powder, yield: 86%, purity: 95% (HPLC; Waters
lBondapak C18 reverse phase column, 125 Å, 10 lm, 3.9 ꢁ 150 mm; gradient
elution with A: 0.1% TFA/water, B: 0.1% TFA/acetonitrile; from 10% to 90% B
over 50 min, flow: 1 ml/min; detection; UV, 230 nm), 1H NMR (DMSO-d6,
300 MHz) d 8.09 (1H, s, –NH), 7.65 (1H, s, @CH–O), 7.50 (1H, d, benzene), 7.24
(1H, d, benzene), 7.16 (1H, s, benzene), 6.49 (1H, s, O@CH@C), 6.26 (2H, s, NH2),
5.06 (1H, s, NH–CH–CO), 4.77 (2H, d, –CH2–O), 3.14 (2H, d, CH2-benzene), 13C
NMR (DMSO, 300 MHz) d 173.5 (C4), 163.5 (C2), 160.0 (C10), 155.3 (C5), 153.5
(C20), 145.9 (C40), 141.0 (C60), 140.0 (C80), 138.2 (C6), 129.2 (C50), 128.0 (C90),
125.0 (C70), 113.2 (C3), 64.9 (C1), 61.5 (C20), 57.2 (C30), MS (ES): [M+1]+ 333.3.
KA-Y-NH2; Yield: 80%, purity: 93%, KA-W-NH2; yield: 87%, purity: 95%, KA-S-
NH2; yield: 76%, purity: 92%, KA-T-NH2; yield: 73%, purity: 86%, KA-D-NH2;
Yield: 83%, purity: 80%, KA-N-NH2; yield: 79%, purity: 84%, KA-E-NH2; yield:
80%, purity: 92%, KA-Q-NH2; yield: 75%, purity: 93%, KA-K-NH2; yield: 71%,
purity: 89%, KA-R-NH2; yield: 76%, purity: 95%, KA-H-NH2; yield: 80%, purity:
96%, KA-C-NH2; yield: 70%, purity: 70%, KA-M-NH2; yield: 82%, purity: 92%,
KA-P-NH2; yield: 74%, purity: 86%, KA-G-NH2; yield: 76%, purity: 96%, KA-A-
NH2; yield: 77%, purity: 93%, KA-V-NH2; yield: 76%, purity: 89%, KA-F-NH2;
yield: 80%, purity: 91%, KA-F-NH2; yield: 80%, purity: 90%.
18. Kermasha, S.; Goetghebeur, M.; Monfette, A.; Metche, M.; Rovel, B.
Phytochemistry 1993, 2, 349.
In summary, we prepared 20 kinds of KA-AA-NH2 derivatives
and screened their tyrosinase inhibitory activities. Among them,
KA-F-NH2, KA-Y-NH2, KA-W-NH2, and KA-H-NH2 showed much
higher tyrosinase inhibitory activity and their enhanced inhibitory
activity was maintained for over 3 months. We also confirmed that
the KA-F-NH2 reduced the amount of dopachrome production dur-
ing the melanin formation. Finally, we suggest a tyrosinase inhibi-
tion mechanism of KA-AA-NH2 based on the possible hydrophobic
interactions between the side chain of KA-AA-NH2 and tyrosinase
active site by a docking program. Further studies are on progress
to confirm the tyrosinase inhibitory activity of KA-AA-NH2 in the
cell system.
19. Li, B.; Huang, Y.; Paskewitz, S. M. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 1877.
20. Park, Y. D.; Kim, S. Y.; Lyou, Y. J.; Lee, D. Y.; Yang, J. M. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2006,
84, 112.
21. Shin, N. H.; Ryu, S. Y.; Choi, E. J.; Kang, S. H.; Chang, I. M.; Min, K. R.; Kim, Y.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998, 243, 801.
22. Bernard, P.; Berthon, J. Y. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2000, 22, 219.
23. Kim, Y. M.; Yun, J.; Lee, C. K.; Lee, H.; Min, K. R.; Kim, Y. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 18,
16340.
24. Klabunde, T.; Eicken, C.; Sacchettini, J. C.; Krebs, B. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1998, 12,
1084.
25. Steiner, R. A.; Kooter, I. M.; Dijkastra, B. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 7955.
26. Matoba, Y.; Kumagai, T.; Yamamoto, A.; Yoshitsu, H.; Sugiyama, M. J. Biol. Chem.
2006, 13, 8981.
27. Naka, H.; Kondo, Y.; Usui, S.; Hashimoto, Y.; Uchiyama, M. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2007, 349, 595.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Z1
R&D Project, Ministry & Welfare, Republic of Korea (A050432).
28. Khatib, S.; Nerya, O.; Musa, R.; Tamir, S.; Peter, T.; Vaya, J. J. Med. Chem. 2007,
50, 2676.