11296 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 48, No. 23, 2009
Ziegler et al.
Mo(O)2(3,5-tBu2-Saladach) (3). A mixture of (R,R)-1,2-cy-
clohexanediamino-N,N0-bis(3,5-di-t-butyl-salicylidene), H2-
(3,5-tBu2-saldach), (553 mg, 1.01 mmol), Mo(CO)6 (238 mg,
0.902 mmol) in THF (70 mL) was refluxed under air for 19 h in
which time the color changed from yellow to green-brown and
then dark purple. After cooling to ambient temperature, the
resulting dark brown solution was filtered and the filtrate was
dried in vacuo. The residue was treated with a small amount of
hexanes, filtered, and washed with cold hexanes. The product
was obtained as an orange powder. Yield: 232 mg, 38%.
1HNMR (CD2Cl2, 300 MHz): δ 8.06 (s, 1H, CH=N), 8.02
(s, 1H, CH=N), 7.61 (d, J=2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H),
7.28 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (d, J=
2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.74
(d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.15 (br s, 1H, NH), 5.62 (br, 1H, NH), 4.60
(d, J=12.9 Hz, 1H, benzylic), 4.18-4.40 (m, 3H, benzylic), 3.15
(m, 1H, C6H10), 2.75 (m, 1H, C6H10), 2.62 (m, 1H, C6H10), 2.40
(m, 2H, C6H10), 2.23 (m, 2H, C6H10), 1.60-1.95 (m, 6H, C6H10),
1.51 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.43 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.35 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.33 (s, 9H,
tBu), 1.28 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.22 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.13 (s, 9H, tBu), 0.94
(s, 9H, tBu). MS (ESIþ): m/z 675 (98MoO2L þ Hþ), with correct
isotopic pattern for Mo. Anal. Calcd (found) for C36H54N2O4-
Mo: C, 64.08 (64.25); H, 8.07 (7.99); N, 4.15 (3.96).
Mo(O)2(3,5-tBu2-Salan) (4). The salan ligand was prepared in
86% yield by reduction of the corresponding salen ligand with
NaBH4 in THF-H2O, following a literature protocol.22 The
dioxo Mo complex was synthesized by refluxing a mixture of
Mo(O)2(acac)2 and H2Salan (slight excess) in MeOH, according
to a previous report.23 Yield: 80%. 1H NMR (C6D6, 300 MHz):
δ 7.49 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 2H), 5.23 (d, J=
14.7 Hz, 2H, benzylic), 3.64 (d, J=14.7 Hz, 2H, benzylic), 2.08
(m, 4H), 1.66 (s, 18H, tbutyl), 1.32 (s, 18H, tbutyl), 0.90 (m, 2H),
0.099 (m, 4H). NH signals were not located.
X-ray Data Collection and Structure Solution. A summary of
structure determination is provided here and further details can
be found in the Supporting Information. Crystallographic data
for 1: C32H47MoN2O4, 0.465(CH2Cl2), F.W.=659.18, 0.44 ꢀ 0.40 ꢀ
0.13 mm crystal dimension, triclinic, space group P1(#2),
˚
a=14.569(3), b=15.011(6), c=18.323(5) A; R=72.878(13),
3
˚
β =88.824(7), γ=72.504(11)°, V=3642.3(19) A . Z=4, Fcalcd
=
1.202 g/cm3, u=0.451 mm-1, 44292 reflections collected, 12726
unique (Rint=0.064), R1=0.057, R2=0.144, for 8629 reflections
with Fo2 > 2σ(Fo2).
Crystallographic data for 2: C28H38MoN2O4, F.W.=562.57,
0.38 ꢀ 0.31 ꢀ 0.25 mm crystal dimension, monoclinic, space
group P 1 21 1(#4). a=8.50330(10), b=22.8862(4), c=14.9349(3)
˚
A; β=106.2526(6)°, V=2790.30(8) A . Z=4, Fcalcd=1.339 g/cm3,
3
˚
u=0.490 mm-1, 30847 reflections collected, 12688 unique (Rint
=
2
0.039), R1=0.037, R2=0.075, for 9942 reflections with Fo2 >2σ(Fo ).
Crystallographic data for 4: C36H56MoN2O4,H2O,0.65-
(CH4O), F.W.=715.64, 0.38 ꢀ 0.15 ꢀ 0.13 mm crystal dimen-
sions. Hexagonal, space group P31 (#144), a=17.0026(13), c=
13.6160(12) A, V=3408.9(5) A . Z=3, Fcalcd=1.046 g/cm3, u=
0.315 mm-1, 9437 reflections collected, 6931 unique (Rint=0.079),
R1=0.055, R2=0.136, for 5432 reflections with Fo2 > 2σ(Fo2).
Crystallographic data for 6: C64H96Mo2N4O7,2(C7H8),
F.W. = 1409.66, 0.35 ꢀ 0.20 ꢀ 0.06 mm crystal dimension,
3
˚
˚
monoclinic, C12/c1(#15), a = 30.4913(17), b = 13.6081(8) c =
3
˚
˚
17.9982(6) A; β=93.323(3)°, V=7455.4(7) A . Z=4, Fcalcd
=
1.256 g/cm3, u=0.379 mm-1, 42133 reflections collected, 6562
unique (Rint=0.094), R1=0.045, R2=0.111, for 4763 reflections
with Fo2 > 2σ(Fo2).
Catalytic Hydrosilylation of Ketones: General Procedure. To a
J. Young NMR tube was added ketone (1.0 mmol), silane
(1.2 mmol), Mo catalyst (1 or 5 mol %), and solvent (0.6 mL).
The resulting solution was capped and heated in a sand bath at
1
MoIV(O)(tBu2-Salalen) (5). In a nitrogen-filled glovebox a
three-neck round-bottom flask with a magnetic stir bar was
charged with Mo(O)2(Salalen-tBu2), 1, (0.200 g, 0.322 mmol)
dissolved in toluene. The reaction flask was capped and taken
out of the glovebox. Under nitrogen atmosphere a condenser
was attached to the round-bottom flask. To this solution was
added PMe3 1.0 M solution in toluene (1.61 mL, 1.61 mmol)
through one of the side arms. The resulting solution was heated
in a sand bath at ∼120 °C for 24 h. The reaction mixture was
filtered under inert atmosphere and the filtrate was dried in
vacuo. Yield 0.049 g, 25%.
∼110 °C. The reaction progress was monitored by H NMR.
After the reaction was complete, as indicated by the complete
disappearance of ketone, the reaction mixture was hydrolyzed in
acidic ether for a few hours. After extraction with diethylether,
the organic phase was dried, concentrated, and subjected to
flash chromatography on a silica gel column, and eluted with
hexanes-EtOAc. The isolated alcohols were identified by com-
paring the 1H NMR spectra with literature reports.
Reaction of MoVI(O)2(Salalen-tBu2) with PhSiH3. A mixture
of Mo(O)2(salalen-tBu2) (22 mg, 0.035 mmol), PhSiH3 (8.6 μL,
0.070 mmol) in C6D6 (0.62 mL) was heated in a sand bath to
∼100 °C and the reaction progress was monitored by 1H NMR
spectroscopy. New peaks in the 5.5-1.9 ppm region were
observed alongside the starting complex MoVI(O)2-
(salalen-tBu2). Further heating to 110 °C for several hours
resulted in increasing the intensity of these peaks (∼60% of
total detectable Mo), accompanied by nearly complete disap-
pearance of starting MoVI(O)2(salalen-tBu2) and the appearance
of MoIV(O)(salalen-tBu2), 5. This intermediate species was
tentatively assigned as MoIV(OH)(OSiPhH2)(salalen-tBu2).
1HNMR (C6D6, 300 MHz): δ 5.07 (d, J=14.1 Hz, 1H, benzylic),
3.30 (d, J=13.8 Hz, 1H, benzylic), 2.42 (br, 2H, OH and NH).
Other peaks were difficult to assign because of their close
proximity and overlap to peaks from compounds 1 and 5.
1HNMR (CD2Cl2, 300 MHz): δ 8.15 (s, 1H, CH=N), 7.65 (m,
1H, aromatic), 7.35 (m, 1H, aromatic), 7.17 (s, 1H, aromatic),
6.76 (s, 1H, aromatic), 4.19 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 1H, benzylic), 3.52
(m, 2H, NH þ benzylic), 3.33 (m, 1H, ethyl), 2.90 (m, 2H, ethyl),
2.59 (m, 1H, ethyl), 1.48 (s, 9H, tbutyl), 1.35 (s, 9H, tbutyl), 1.23
(s, 9H, tbutyl), 1.13 (s, 9H, tbutyl). MS (ESIþ): m/z 606
(98MoOL) with the correct isotope pattern for Mo.
μ-Oxo-(Mo(O)(salalen-tBu2))2 (6). In a nitrogen-filled glove-
box a three-neck round-bottom flask with a magnetic stir bar
was charged with Mo(O)2(Salalen-tBu2), 1, (0.200 g, 0.322 mmol
dissolved in toluene. The reaction flask was capped, taken out of
the glovebox, and under nitrogen atmosphere a condenser was
attached to the flask. To this solution was added PMe3 1.0 M
solution in toluene (644 μL, 0.644 mmol) through one of the side
arms. The resulting solution was heated in a sand bath at ∼120 °C
for 24 h. The mixture was filtered and the remaining dark red solid
was rinsed with toluene and dried in vacuo. Yield 0.0912 g, 46%.
Anal. Calcd (found) for C67H96Mo2N4O7: C, 62.73 (62.73); H,
7.90 (7.94); N, 4.57 (4.70).
Acknowledgment. This research was supported by the Che-
mical Sciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S.
Department of Energy (Grant DE-FG02-06ER15794).
Supporting Information Available: Crystallographic tables for
atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic parameters, bond
lengths, and angles for complexes 1, 2, 4, and 6 (CIF). Experi-
mental details for X-ray studies (PDF). This material is available
(22) Zeynizadeh, B.; Behyar, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2005, 78, 307–315.
(23) Subramanian, P.; Spence, J. T.; Ortega, R.; Enemark, J. H. Inorg.
Chem. 1984, 23, 2564–72.