M. Jha, B. Blunt / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 6044–6047
6047
available benzofuran-3-one (15) were treated with acetic anhy-
References and notes
dride in the presence of 1 mol % DMAP. The reactivity of thione
13 was found to be somewhat different than indolin-2-ones (1,2).
The TLC analysis revealed that the thione 13 was completely con-
sumed within one hour of the reaction. However, the spectroscopic
analysis of the product indicated that only S-acetylation had taken
place and compound 20 (S-acetylated 2-mercaptoindole) was iso-
lated in excellent yield (Table 2, entry 8). Heating for an additional
3 h resulted in the formation N,S-diacetylated product 21 in good
yield (Table 2, entry 9) but no C-acetylated product was isolated
from the reaction mixture. While the absence of C-acetylation in
this case initially appeared surprising but upon close inspection
it was discerned that the higher nucleophilicity of the S atom is
responsible for this. Subsequent acetylation occurred at N- which
is next in the order of nucleophilicity. After the N- and S-diacetyla-
tion, the nucleophilicity of the 3-C was lost and therefore no fur-
ther acetylation occurred under the applied reaction conditions.
On the contrary, the N-methyl substituted thione 14 reacted with
acetic anhydride in fashion similar to N-alkylindolin-2-ones
(7–10), giving rise to the 3-acetyl-2-mercapto product 22 in 71%
yield. This observation is consistent with the effect of electron-
donating N-alkyl group on the nucleophilicity of S/O on the neigh-
bouring C-2 carbon (vide supra). The reaction results indicate that
the electron-donating ability of N-methyl group becomes detri-
mental to the nucleophilicity of S at C-2. With the thione S unacet-
ylated, the C-3 carbon remains nucleophilic enough to undergo
acetylation. We will continue to investigate this aspect.
1. For recent reviews on indole alkaloids and the biological activity of
compounds containing the indole substructure see: (a) Ishikura, M.;
Yamada, K. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009, 26, 803–852; (b) Higuchi, K.; Kawasaki, T.
Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007, 24, 843–868; (c) Saxton, J. E.. In The Alkaloids; Cordell, G.
A., Ed.; Academic: San Diego, 1998; Vol. 51, (d) Saxton, J. E. Nat. Prod. Rep.
1997, 14, 559–590; (e) Brancale, A.; Silvestri, R. Med. Res. Rev. 2007, 27, 209–
238; (f) Harper, S.; Avolio, S.; Pacini, B.; Di Filippo, M.; Altamura, S.; Tomei, L.;
Paonessa, G.; Di Marco, S.; Carfi, A.; Giuliano, C.; Padron, J.; Bonelli, F.;
Migliaccio, G.; De Francesco, R.; Laufer, R.; Rowley, M.; Narjes, F. J. Med. Chem.
2005, 48, 4547–4557.
2. (a) Sundberg, R. J. The Chemistry of Indoles; Academic: New York, NY, 1970;
(b) Sundberg, R. J.. In Pyrroles and their Benzoderivatives: Synthesis and
Applications. Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry; Katritzky, A. R., Rees, C.
W., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1984; Vol. 4, pp 313–376; (c) Sundberg, R.
J. In Best Synthetic Methods, Indoles; Academic: New York, NY, 1996; (d)
Joule, J. A.. In Indole and its Derivatives. Science of Synthesis: Houben–Weyl
Methods of Molecular Transformations; Thomas, E. J., Ed.; George Thieme:
Stuttgart, Germany, 2000; Vol. 10,. Category 2, Chapter 10.13 (e) Brown, R.
K.. In Houlihan, W. J., Indoles, Eds.; Wiley Interscience: New York, NY,
1972.
3. (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Hao, J. L.; Reddy, M. V.; Rao, P. B.; Rassias, G.; Snyder, S. A.;
Huang, X. H.; Chen, D. Y. K.; Brenzovich, W. E.; Giuseppone, N.; Giannakakou,
P.; O’Brate, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15316; (b) Marti, C.; Carreira, E. M.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 2209–2219.
4. For recent reviews on phytoalexins see: (a) Pedras, M. S. C.; Zheng, Q. A.;
Sarma-Mamillapalle, V. K. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2007, 2, 319–330; (b) Pedras, M.
S. C.; Jha, M.; Ahiahonu, P. W. K. Curr. Org. Chem. 2003, 7, 1635–1647.
5. Ishimaru, T.; Shibata, N.; Nagai, J.; Nakamura, S.; Toru, T.; Kanemasa, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16488–16489.
6. Pedras, M. S. C.; Jha, M. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1828–1834.
7. (a) Pedras, M. S. C.; Jha, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 4958–4979; (b) Pedras,
M. S. C.; Gadagi, R. S.; Jha, M.; Sarma-Mamillepalle, V. K. Phytochemistry 2007,
68, 1572–1578; (c) Pedras, M. S. C.; Jha, M.; Minic, Z.; Oladapo, G. O. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 6054–6061; (d) Pedras, M. S. C.; Jha, M.; Oladapo, G. O.
Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 2609–2616; (e) Pedras, M. S. C.; Minic, Z.; Jha, M.
FEBS J. 2008, 5, 3691–3705; Pedras, M. S. C.; Adio, A. M.; Suchy, M.; Okinyo, D.
P. O.; Zheng, Q.; Jha, M.; Sarwar, M. G. J. Chromatogr., A 2006, 1133, 172–
183.
Acetylation occurred at both C-2 and C-3 O-positions in the case
of 15 to produce compound 23 and the reaction time was also
found to be substantially shortened (1 h); in the literature diacet-
ylation of 15 to produce the same product uses stirring in acetic
anhydride and sulfuric acid for 5 h at room temperature.13
8. Robertson, D. W.; Krushinski, J. H.; Kau, D. J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm. 1986,
23, 343–354.
In conclusion, we have described first one-pot multiple acyla-
tion of indolin-2-ones, indoline-2-thiones and benzofuran-3-one
using catalytic amount of DMAP and acyl anhydrides. Indolin-2-
ones devoid of N-alkyl substitution resulted in triacetylation at
N-1, C-2 O and C-3 carbon. N-Methylindolin-2-ones, under identi-
cal conditions, furnished N-methyl-3-acetyl-2-hydroxyindoles as
the major product. Indoline-2-thiones devoid of N-alkyl substitu-
tion underwent chemoselective monoacetylation on S after 1 h of
reaction time; prolonged reaction time led to the formation of
N- and S-diacetyl derivative. On the other hand, N-methylindo-
line-2-thione resulted in chemoselective monoacetylation at the
C-3 position. The variance in chemistry witnessed here by subtle
change in reactivity is quite interesting and warrants further inves-
tigation. The products obtained through this acylation study with
unprecedented results are extremely valuable in preparing a large
number of unexplored heterocyclic systems.
9. (a) Etkin, N.; Babu, S. D.; Fooks, C. J.; Durst, T. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 1093–1096;
(b) Himbert, V. G.; Ruppich, M. Angew. Chem. 1990, 102, 69–70; (c) Doyle, M. P.;
Shanklin, M. S.; Pho, H. Q.; Mahapatro, S. N. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 1017–
1022.
10. Hugel, H. M.; Greenwood, R. J.; Mackay, M. F. Aust. J. Chem. 1992, 45, 1953–
1959.
11. Tichenor, M. S.; Kastrinsky, D. B.; Boger, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8396–
8398.
12. Minakata, S.; Kasano, Y.; Ota, H.; Oderaotoshi, Y.; Komatsu, M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
3693–3695.
13. Bergman, J.; Egestad, B. Acta Chem. Scand. B 1980, 34, 177–179.
14. Porcs-Makkay, M.; Volk, B.; Kapiller-Dezsofi, R.; Mezei, T.; Simig, G. Monatsh.
Chem. 2004, 135, 697–711.
15. (a) Berry, D. J.; Digiovanna, C. V.; Metrick, S. S.; Murugan, R. ARKIVOC 2001, 2,
944–964; (b) Sakakura, A.; Kawajiri, K.; Ohkubo, T.; Kosugi, Y.; Ishihara, K. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14775–14779.
16. In a typical procedure, indolin-2-ones (0.5 g, 3.76 mmol), acetic anhydride
(3.8 g, 37.5 mmol) and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP, 1 mol %) were heated
at 150 °C for 4 h in a round-bottomed flask equipped with air condenser and
CaCl2 guard tube. After the completion of reaction (as evident from TLC), the
excess of acyl anhydride was evaporated under reduced pressure and residue
was recrystallized using methanol to give 3a as white solid (0.93 g, 95% yield).
Mp: 137–139 °C (methanol). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.31 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H),
7.61 (d, J = 7.5, 1H), 7.34 (dd, J = 8, 8 Hz, 1H), 2.21 (dd, J = 8, 8 Hz, 1H), 2.74 (s,
3H), 2.72 (s, 3H), 2.44 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d 170.9, 167.8, 167.0,
161.8, 137.8, 129.1, 124.9, 122.9, 121.6, 116.3, 115.5, 27.0, 21.3, 19.0. FTIR mmax
(KBr): 3471, 1757, 1742, 1698, 1460, 748 cmÀ1. GC–MS (EI): m/z (% relative
Acknowledgements
Financial support from Nipissing University (M.J.) and Ontario
Work Study Program Nipwork (B.B.) is gratefully acknowledged.
We would also like to thank Laurentian University for granting ac-
cess to its analytical facility.
abundance) 259 (M+, 5), 217 (40), 175(100), 150 (35), 129 (10).
16
17. Spectroscopic data are given in Ref.
.
18. Crestini, C.; Saladino, R. Synth. Commun. 1994, 24, 2835–2841.