6232
G. R. Cathcart et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 6230–6232
The same general preference also exists for the P02 residue, with
P02 Phe-, Leu-, and Val-based compounds occupying seven out of
the top 10 inhibitors. This confirms the known preference for aro-
matic or large aliphatic residues in the S02 pocket, indicating that
this region of the active site is also predominantly hydrophobic.
The acidic residues Asp and Glu performed poorly in the P02 posi-
tion, while the basic residues produced moderate inhibitors. How-
ever, no single amino acid residue occupying the P02 position of the
inhibitors produced active compounds in every instance, suggest-
ing that the P01 position is the driving determinant for recognition.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported, in part, by the award of a postgradu-
ate studentship to G.R.C. from the Department of Employment and
Learning (D.E.L.) Northern Ireland.
References and notes
1. Liu, P. V. J. Infect. Dis. 1974, 130, S94.
2. (a) Johnson, D.; Carter-Hamm, B.; Dralle, W. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1982,
126(6), 1070; (b) Tamura, Y.; Suzuki, S.; Kijima, M.; Takahashi, T.; Nakamura,
M. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 1992, 54(3), 597; (c) Grinnell, F.; Zhu, M. F. J. Invest. Dermatol.
1996, 106(2), 335; (d) Kon, Y.; Tsukada, H.; Hasegawa, T.; Igarashi, K.; Wada, K.;
Suzuki, E.; Arakawa, M.; Gejyo, F. F. E. M. S. Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 1999,
25(3), 313; (e) Komori, Y.; Nonogaki, T.; Nikai, T. Toxicon 2001, 39, 1327; (f)
Molla, A.; Matsumoto, K.; Oyamada, I.; Katsuki, T. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 53(3), 522;
(g) Leidal, K. G.; Munson, K. L.; Johnson, M. C.; Denning, G. M. J. Interferon
Cytokine Res. 2003, 23(6), 307.
3. Kamath, S.; Kapatral, V.; Chakrabarty, A. M. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 30(5),
933.
4. (a) Li, Z.; Kosorok, M.; Farrell, P.; Laxova, A.; West, S. JAMA 2005, 293(5), 581;
(b) Tuomanen, E.; Parad, R.; Gerard, C.; Zurakowski, D. Infect. Immun. 1999,
67(9), 4744.
Figure 4. Relative potency of individual compounds displayed as the reciprocal of
the micromolar Ki value (1/Ki) to distinguish the most potent inhibitors. The library
has been arranged according to the dipeptide amino acid sequences, and colour
coded according to P01 residue.
at P01 did not guarantee a successful inhibitor in all cases. P01 Phen-
ylalanine for example, although routinely employed in previous
studies, produced only moderate inhibition (Ki = 11–645 lM across
5. (a) Hoiby, N. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2002, 1(4), 249; (b) Schierholz, J.; Beuth, J.; Konig, D.;
Nurnberger, A. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. 1999, 289(2), 165; (c) Xu, K.; Mcfeters, G.;
Stewart, P. Microbiology 2000, 146, 547.
6. Blackwood, L.; Stone, R.; Iglewski, B.; Pennington, J. Infect. Immun. 1983,
3(1), 198.
this group) as part of the C-terminal amide containing mercapto-
acetyl dipeptides of this study. We have displayed the relative po-
tency of each inhibitor as the reciprocal of its Ki value in Figure 4,
with values arranged according to the amino acid residues occupy-
ing the P01 and P02 positions in each case. It is immediately apparent
from this figure that for the most active compounds from this li-
brary, the P01 position is almost exclusively occupied by aromatic
or bulky aliphatic residues, with Tyr, Trp and Ile appearing in nine
of the top ten inhibitors. Methionine is also represented at this po-
sition. It can thus be concluded that the S01 pocket is highly specific
for bulky hydrophobic residues, but this is again dependent on the
presence of a suitable residue at P02 within the overall inhibitor
structure.
7. (a) Kessler, E.; Israel, M.; Landshman, N.; Chechick, A.; Blumberg, S.
Infect. Immun. 1982, 38(2), 716; (b) Burns, F.; Paterson, C.; Gray, R.;
Wells, J. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1990, 34(11), 2065; (c) Sokol, P.
A.; Kooi, C.; Hodges, R. S.; Cachia, P.; Woods, D. E. J. Infect. Dis. 2000,
181(5), 1682.
8. (a) Crunkhorn, S. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2008, 7(11), 891; (b) Rasmussen, T. B.;
Givskov, M. Microbiology 2006, 152(4), 895; (c) Travis, J.; Potempa, J. Biochim.
Biophys. Acta 2000, 1477(1), 35.
9. Rasko, D. A.; Moreira, C. G.; Li, D. R.; Reading, N. C.; Ritchie, J. M.; Waldor, M. K.;
Williams, N.; Taussig, R.; Wei, S.; Roth, M.; Hughes, D. T.; Huntley, J. F.; Fina, M.
W.; Falck, J. R.; Sperandio, V. Science 2008, 321(5892), 1078.
10. Lynas, J.; Martin, S.; Walker, B.; Baxter, A.; Bird, J. Comb. Chem. High Throughput
Screening 2000, 3, 37.
11. Microwave-assisted coupling: 18 W, 75 °C, 300 s.
12. (a) Morihara, K.; Tsuzuki, H. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1966, 114(1), 158; (b)
Morihara, K.; Tsuzuki, H. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1971, 146(1), 291.