reactivity of the dissolved catalyst and therefore improve both
reactivity and selectivity.14 Among the commonly used ionic
liquids, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazoliumhexafluorophosphate
([bmim]PF6) is a popular reaction medium for a wide variety
of transition metal catalyzed organic transformations such
as hydrogenation,20 oxidation,21 hydroformylation,22 oligo-
merization,23 etc.
Scheme 1
In initial explorations, when 3-buten-2-ol was stirred with
benzaldehyde and a catalytic amount of RuCl2(PPh3)3 (5 mol
%) in [bmim]PF6 for 24 h at room temperature, no desired
product was obtained. When the mixture was heated at 90
°C in an oil bath, the reaction mixture became homogeneous
and a smooth reaction occurred to give the desired aldol
product (with a syn:anti ratio of 71:29, stereochemistry
determined by comparison with literature data)13 in 81%
isolated yield.24 Decomposition of the desired product was
observed after prolonged reaction time, e.g. overnight,
possibly due to elimination of the hydroxy group to give an
R,â-unsaturated ketone. A small amount of 2-butanone was
detected by GC, although exact quantification was difficult
to achieve because of the volatility of the ketone. Subse-
quently, a variety of aromatic aldehydes were examined
under similar reaction conditions (Table 1). In most cases,
gained much attention recently is “ionic liquids.” Their
nonvolatile nature gives them significant advantage in
minimizing solvent consumption. Their polarity renders them
good solvents for transition metal catalysis and therefore
good reaction media for homogeneous catalysis.14 Because
of their unique solubility properties, i.e., miscibility gap
between water and organic solvents, they have become
interesting candidates for separation processes by simple
liquid-liquid extraction with either aqueous or conventional
organic solvents.15
Previously, we reported that in the presence of a catalytic
amount of RuCl2(PPh3)3 functional groups of homoallylic
alcohols and allylic alcohols underwent rearrangement in air
and water.16 A side reaction of the isomerization is the
formation of a ketone, which was rationalized by a competing
process involving the cleavage of the allylic C-H bond
(instead of the C-O bond) to form a ruthenium-enol
complex,17 followed by hydrolysis to give the ketone. We
envisioned that in the presence of an aldehyde, such a
ruthenium-enol complex may be captured,18 and indeed we
found that aldol products were formed via a RuCl2(PPh3)3-
catalyzed cross-coupling of allylic alcohols and aldehydes
in water.19 We now report for the first time aldol-type
(Scheme 1) and Mannich-type (Scheme 3) reaction between
aldehydes and imines with allylic alcohol catalyzed by RuCl2-
(PPh3)3 in ionic liquid.
Table 1. Coupling of Aldehydes with Allylic Alcohol in Ionic
Liquid
time yield
entry
aldehyde (R)
Ph
solvent
I.L.
(h)
(%)a syn/antib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1.5
1.5
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
5
5
81
68
75
79
80
84
94
67
46
52
65
35
70
71/29
68/32
71/29
75/25
72/28
71/29
69/31
37/63
16/84
33/67
42/58
60/40
76/26
m-F-C6H4
p-Cl-C6H4
p-Br-C6H4
p-MeO-C6H4
p-Ph-C6H4
2-naphthyl
n-C7H15
I.L.
I.L.
I.L.
I.L.
I.L.
I.L.
I.L.
In many applications ionic liquids with weakly coordinat-
-
-
ing anions, such as BF4 and PF6 , together with suitably
substituted cations often result in an altered chemical
diphenylmethyl I.L.
2-phenylethyl
cyclohexyl
p-Cl-C6H4
I.L.
I.L.
H2O
H2O-toluene
(4:1)
(9) Chan, T. H.; Li, C. J.; Wei, Z. Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1990, 505.
(10) Lubineau, A. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2142.
(11) Kobayashi, S.; Hachiya, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 1625.
(12) Loh, T. P.; Pei, J.; Cao, G. Q. Chem. Commun. 1996, 1819.
(13) Tian, H. Y.; Chen, Y. J.; Wang, D.; Zeng, C. C.; Li, C. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 2529.
(14) Wasserscheid, P.; Keim, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2000,
39, 3772.
p-Cl-C6H4
14
2-naphthyl
H2O-toluene
(4:1)
5
44
63/37
a Isolated yields were reported. b the diastereoselectivity was based on
1HNMR analysis of the crude products.
(15) Huddleston, J. G.; Willauer, H. D.; Swatloski, R. P.; Visser, A. E.;
Rogers, R. D. Chem. Commun. 1998, 1765.
(16) (a). Li, C. J.; Wang, D.; Chen, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
12867. (b). Wang, D.; Chen, D.; Haberman, J. X.; Li, C. J. Tetrahedron
1998, 54, 5129. (c). Wang, D.; Li, C. J. Synth. Commun. 1998, 28, 507.
(17) For other examples of Ru enolates, see: (a) Hartwig, J. F.; Bergman,
R. G.; Anderson, R. A. Organometallics 1991, 10, 3326. (b) Rasley, B. T.;
Rapta, M.; Kulawiec, R. J. Organometallics 1996, 15, 2852. (c) Chang, S.;
Na, Y.; Choi, E.; Kim, S. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2089. (d) Trost, B. M.; Toste,
F. D.; Pinkerton, A. B. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 2067.
(18) Previously, Ru-enol intermediates have been captured by aldehydes
in a Michael addition reaction: (a) Trost, B. M.; Pinkerton, A. B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8081. For capturing of Pd and Pt enolates by
aldehydes, see: (b) Hagiwara, E.; Fujii, A.; Sodeoka, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 2474. (c) Fujimura, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10032.
(d) Sodeoka, M.; Ohrai, K.; Shibasaki, M. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2648.
(19) Wang, M.; Li, C. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 3589.
the desired aldol products were obtained in good yields even
with less reactive aldehydes such as 2-naphthaldehyde or
p-anisaldehyde. The only exception was 4-hydroxybenzal-
dehyde, with which a very low yield was achieved. One
(20) Steines, S.; Drieben-Holscher, B.; Wasserscheid, P. J. Prakt. Chem.
2000, 342, 348.
(21) Song, C. E.; Roh, E. J. Chem. Commun. 2000, 837.
(22) Chauvin, Y.; Oliver, H.; Mubamann, L. FR 95/14,147, 1995; Chem.
Abstr. 1997, 127, P341298k.
(23) Chen, W.; Xu, L.; Chatterton, C.; Xiao, J. Chem. Commun. 1999,
1247.
658
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 5, 2003