Zhang et al.
JOCArticle
SCHEME 1
SCHEME 2
species. β-Alkoxide elimination from zirconacycles has also
been reported for the construction of allenes.8 Allenic/pro-
pargylic zirconium species can be conveniently prepared by
treatment of propargylic ethers with dibutylzirconocene
complex (Negishi reagent). However, the synthetic utility
of these intermediates has only been described in the reaction
with aldehydes, which affords mainly homopropargyl alco-
hols.3b,6 Nevertheless, the development of new C-C bond
formation reactions via these organometallic derivatives is
still highly demanding. In this paper, we report the substi-
tuent-dependent generation of the allenic zirconium com-
plexes and their coupling reactions with aryl halides
(Scheme 1). The coupling reaction of aryl halides with
organometals represents one of the most powerful methods
for C-C bond formation. Although the coupling reactions
of aryl iodides with various organozirconocenes such as vinyl
zirconocenes, zirconacyclopentenes, or zirconacyclopenta-
dienes are known,9 there is no report for the coupling
reactions with allenic/propargylic zirconium complexes to
the best of our knowledge. The present method could be
readily applied to the synthesis of multisubstituted allenes.
hydrolysis of the reaction mixture might form allenes, which
could also account for the existence of allenic zirconium
species. However, there are no such results in their report.
Here we found that quenching the reaction mixture by 3 N
HCl aqueous solution in the case of propargyl methyl ether
1a (R1 = Ph) bearing a cyclic ring at C-1 selectively afforded
allene 5a in 87% yield without contamination of any alkyne
6a (Scheme 2 and Table 1, entry 1). Alkyl-substituted
propargylic ethers 1b, 1d, and 1e afforded similar results,
although with lower yield compared with the phenyl-
substituted propargylic ether (entries 2, 4, and 5). The
substrate of 1f tethered with a phenyl group on the alkyne
substituent afforded allene 5f and alkyne 6f in 81% and 6%
yields, respectively (entry 6). C-1 substituted by two methyl
groups gave exclusively allene 5g in 64% yield (entry 7).
C-1-monosubstituted propargylic ethers 1h-j also gave rise
to allenes as major products (entries 8-10). The above
reactions also provided an efficient method for the synthesis
of allenes by simply quenching the zirconium intermedi-
ates.10 Interestingly, when R1 was a TMS group, the reaction
selectively generated alkynes 6k-n in 55-70% yields
(entries 11-14), whereas the allene products were not
t
Results and Discussion
detected. It is noteworthy that bulky Bu-substituted 1j
reacted completely differently with zirconocene-butene
complex compared with TMS-substituted one, in which
allene 5j was obtained as a major product (entry 10). In
addition to the steric effect caused by TMS group, the special
Hydrolysis of Allenic/Propargylic Zirconium Complexes
Generated from Propargylic Ether. Our investigation began
with an examination of the reaction between propargylic
ether 1 with Negishi reagent “Cp2ZrBu2” (Scheme 2). In
principle, both the allenic 3 and propargylic zirconium
species 4 could be formed under the reaction conditions,
and there exists an equilibrium between the two species. The
latter is suggested to be produced through a 1,3-metallotro-
pic rearrangement. As proposed by Taguchi et al.,3b,6 when
the propargylic ether contains a substituent at the pro-
pargylic position, the allenic zirconium will be formed pre-
ferentially due to the steric repulsion between R2/R3
substituent and the metal center. We envisioned that
ꢀ
(10) Selected papers for the synthesis of allenes, see: (a) Rona, P.; Crabbe,
P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 3289. (b) Jayanth, T. T.; Jeganmohan, M.;
Cheng, M.; Chu, S.; Cheng, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2232. (c)
Bertozzi, F.; Crotti, P.; Macchia, F.; Pineschi, M.; Arnold, A.; Feringa, B. L.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4893. (d) Makioka, Y.; Koyama, K.; Nishiyama,
T.; Takaki, K.; Taniguchi, Y.; Fujiwara, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 6283.
(e) Cunico, R. F.; Zaporowski, L. F.; Rogers, M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
9307. (f) Ma, S.; He, Q. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 2769. (g) Schultz-Fademrecht,
€
C.; Wibbeling, B.; Frohlich, R.; Hoppe, D. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1221. (h)
Nakamura, H.; Kamakura, T.; Ishikura, M.; Biellmann, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 5958. (i) Ma, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 1175. (j) Zhou, Y.; Chen,
J.; Zhao, C.; Wang, E.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 5326. For
palladium-catalyzed coupling reactions of propargylic esters, mesylates, or
carbonates with Grignard or zinc reagents, etc., see: (k) Riveiros, R.;
(8) (a) Takahashi, T.; Hara, R.; Huo, S.; Ura, Y.; Leese, M. P.; Suzuki, N.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 8723. (b) Hara, R.; Ura, Y.; Huo, S.; Kasai, K.;
Suzuki, N.; Takahashi, T. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 300-302, 741.
(9) (a) Negishi, E.; Van Horn, D. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 3168–
3170. (b) Negishi, E.; Takahashi, T.; Baba, S.; Van Horn, D. E.; Okukado, N.
Rodrıguez, D.; Sestelo, J. P.; Sarandeses, L. A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1403. (l)
´
Ma, S.; Wang, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4215. (m) Riveiros, R.;
Sestelo, J. P.; Sarandeses, L. A. Synthesis 2007, 3595. (n) Jeffery-Luong, T.;
Linstrumelle, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 5019. (o) Ruitenberg, K.; Kleijn,
H.; Elsevier, C. J.; Meijer, J.; Vermeer, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 1451.
(p) Konno, T.; Tanikawa, M.; Ishihara, T.; Yamanaka, H. Chem. Lett. 2000,
1360. (q) Dixneuf, P. H.; Guyot, T.; Ness, M. D.; Roberts, S. M. Chem.
Commun. 1997, 2083.
ꢀ
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2393–2401. (c) Hara, R.; Nishihara, Y.; Landre,
P. D.; Takahashi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 447–450. (d) Takahashi, T.;
Sun, W.; Xi, C.; Ubayama, H.; Xi, Z. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 715–726. (e) Guo,
S.; Liu, Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2064. (f) Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Gao, H.; Liu,
Y. Organometallics 2008, 27, 5619–5623.
9352 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 24, 2009