6664
Q. Zhang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 6659–6665
Table 2
but appeared toxic (CC50 = 0.062 mM), which led to a relative low
selectivity index (1.6).27 Initially, tetra-acetyl derivative A1 was
synthesized. Surprisingly, this modification resulted in an eightfold
increase in inhibition to the secretion of HBsAg compared to com-
pound 1 (IC50 = 0.0048 mM vs IC50 = 0.039 mM). Meanwhile it had
lower cytotoxicity (CC50 >1.6 mM vs CC50 = 0.062 mM), resulting a
higher selective index (SI >333 vs SI = 1.6). In addition, compound
A1 also showed highly inhibitory activity on HBeAg secretion with
a SI value of >145 (IC50 = 0.011 mM). A-ring modified compound D
(IC50 = 0.28 mM, SI >7.5) exhibited reduced inhibition effect on
HBeAg secretion compared to compound A1 and lost suppressant
property on the secretion of HBsAg, which indicated that A-ring
of alisol A derivatives is essential for potent anti-HBV activity.
However, we have only one example, we can not conclude that this
will be a general relationship. To further explore the role of acyl-
oxyl at C-11,23,24,25, we performed additional structural modifi-
cations. The addition of methene groups (compound A2) reduced
activity 187-fold of the inhibition to HBsAg secretion compared
to compound A1 (IC50 = 0.90 mM vs IC50 = 0.0048 mM). In addition,
this change produced a loss of property on the secretion of HBeAg.
More bulky tetra-acyl derivatives A3–A21 showed loss of anti-HBV
activity, except that compound A11 was observed to possess mod-
erate activity against the secretion of HBsAg (IC50 = 0.48 mM,
SI >2.9). In an effort to gain more information as to the struc-
ture–activity relationships of alisol A derivatives, we probed addi-
tional structure change. Bioisosteric replacement of the acetyl
groups with trimethylsilyl groups (A22) resulted in 4-fold decrease
in inhibition to the secretion of HBsAg compared to compound A1
(IC50 = 0.020 mM vs IC50 = 0.0048 mM), whereas compound A22
was found toxic (CC50 = 0.051 mM), resulting relative low SI value
(2.5).
Tri-acetyl derivative B1 is much less potent than tetra-acetyl
analogue A1, indicating that acetylation of the free hydroxyl at
C-25 is important for potent anti-HBV activity of alisol A deriva-
tives. To further explore this phenomenon, tri-acyl derivatives
B2–B4 were acetylated to give A25–A27. Of them, compound
A25 exhibited moderate activity against HBsAg secretion
(IC50 = 0.46 mM, SI >3.7) and high potency on the secretion of
HBeAg (IC50 = 0.086 mM, SI >20). More bulky acyls at C-11,23,24
derivatives A26, A27 were inactive in inhibiting the secretion of
HBsAg and HBeAg, suggesting that for C-25 acetyl alisol A deriva-
tives, small acyloxy substituents at C-11,23,24 may be preferred
for anti-HBV activity. Highly potent anti-HBV activity of com-
pounds 2 (IC50HBsAg = 0.028 mM, SI HBsAg >90; IC50HBeAg = 0.027 mM,
Pharmacokinetic profile of compound A1 in ratsa
Rat PK
2 mg/kg (iv)
10 mg/kg (ig)
C0 (ng/mL)
Cmax (ng/mL)
Tpeak (h)
567 95.6
—
—
1.63 0.30
510 46.7
3.87 0.41
5.73 0.39
—
—
383 88.7
1.00 0.00
—
1045 166
—
—
40.9
t1/2 (h)
AUC (ngꢀh/mL)
CL (L/h/kg)
Vss (L/kg)
F (%)
a
Results are expressed as mean SD of n = 3.
cytotoxicities, and nine tested compounds were active against
HBV in HepG 2.2.15 cells. These results provide the following inter-
esting structure–activity relationships: (1) acetyloxyl, methoxy-
acetyloxyl, and ethoxyacetyloxyl groups at C-25 of alisol
A
derivatives enhance potency; (2) for C-25 acetyloxyl alisol A deriv-
atives, small acyloxyl groups at C-11,23,24 may be preferred for
anti-HBV activity; (3) A-ring of alisol A derivatives might be essen-
tial for potent anti-HBV activity; (4) for tetra-acetyl analogue A1,
epoxide functionality at C-13(17) leads to the decrease of suppres-
sant property on the secretion of HBsAg and HBeAg. Furthermore,
Compound A1 possesses favorable pharmacokinetic properties in
rats.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Founda-
tion of China (NSFC No. 30672522), the major project of New
Drug Development, Ministry of Science and Technology (No.
2009ZX09103-108), Xibu Zhiguang Joint-Scholarship of Chinese
Academy of Sciences, the External Cooperation Program of Chinese
Academy of Sciences (No. GJHZ200818), and CAS–Croucher Foun-
dation (CAS-CF07/08.SC03). The authors are grateful to the staff
of the analytical group of the State Key Laboratory of Phytochem-
istry and Plant Resources in West China, Kunming Institute of Bot-
any, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for measurements of all spectra.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
SIHBeAg >93) and 3 (IC50HBsAg = 0.20 mM, SIHBsAg >11; IC50HBeAg
=
References and notes
0.26 mM, SIHBeAg >8.7) led us to prepare compounds A23, A24
which suppressed the secretion of HBsAg (IC50 = 0.0044 mM,
SI = 209; IC50 = 0.014 mM, SI >200, respectively) and HBeAg
(IC50 = 0.012 mM, SI = 77; IC50 = 0.018 mM, SI >156, respectively).
For derivatives C1–C4 resulted from tetra-acylation of compound
E, compound C1 showed decreased inhibition to the secretion of
HBsAg (IC50 = 0.046 mM, SI >87) and HBeAg (IC50 = 0.061 mM,
SI >66) compared to compound A1, which indicated that, for tetra-
acyl analogues, epoxide group at C-13(17) led to the decrease of sup-
pressant property on the secretion of HBsAg and HBeAg.
Further study was carried out in male Sprague-Dawley rats to
characterize the pharmacokinetic properties of compound A1. As
shown in Table 2, following ig administration, compound A1 was
rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract demonstrating
the mean time taken to attain peak concentration (Tpeak) being
1 h, and oral bioavailability (F) was 40.9%. The mean plasma clear-
ance (CL) of compound A1 was 3.87 L/h/kg and steady-state distri-
bution volume (Vss) was 5.73 L/kg resulting in a reasonable
elimination half-life (t1/2) of 1.63 h after an iv administration.
In summary, a series of tetra-acylalisol A analogues were syn-
thesized and examined for their in vitro anti-HBV activities and
1. Gitilin, N. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43, 1500.
2. Mast, E. E.; Alter, M. J.; Margolis, H. S. Vaccine 1999, 17, 1730.
3. Lavanchy, D. J. Viral Hepat. 2004, 11, 97.
4. Karayiannis, P. Exp. Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2004, 2, 745.
5. Fattovich, G.; Brollo, L.; Alberti, A.; Pontisso, P.; Giustina, G.; Realdi, G.
Hepatology 1988, 8, 1651.
6. Fischer, K. P.; Gutfreund, K. S.; Tyrrell, D. L. Drug Resist. Update 2001, 4, 98.
7. Danta, M.; Dusheiko, G. Int. J. Clin. Practice 2004, 58, 877.
8. Colonno, R. J.; Rose, R.; Baldick, C. J.; Levine, S.; Podornowski, K.; Yu, C. F.;
Walsh, A.; Fang, J.; Hsu, M.; Mazzucco, C.; Eggers, B.; Zhang, S.; Plym, M.;
Klesczewski, K.; Tenney, D. J. Hepatology 2006, 44, 1656.
9. Slims, K. A.; Woodland, A. M. Pharmacotherapy 2006, 26, 1745.
10. Kummar, R.; Agrawal, B. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drug 2004, 5, 171.
11. Hanazaki, K. Curr. Drug Targets Inflamm. Allergy 2004, 3, 63.
12. Li, F.; Goila-Gaur, R.; Salzwedel, K.; Kilgore, N. R.; Reddick, M.; Matallana, C.;
Castillo, A.; Zoumplis, D.; Martin, D. E.; Orenstein, J. M.; Allaway, G. P.; Freed, E.
O.; Wild, C. T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 13555.
13. Zhou, J.; Huang, L.; Hachey, D. L.; Chen, C. H.; Aiken, C. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280,
42149.
14. Baltina, L. A.; Flekhter, O. B.; Nigmatullina, L. R.; Boreko, E. I.; Pavlova, N. I.;
Nikolaeva, S. N.; Savinova, O. V.; Tolstikov, G. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003,
13, 3549.
15. Mayaux, J. F.; Bousseau, A.; Pauwels, R.; Huet, T.; Henin, Y.; Dereu, N.; Evers,
M.; Soler, F.; Poujade, C.; Clercq, E. D.; Pecq, J. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994,
91, 3564.