(
)
M. Lorenz et al.rChemical Physics Letters 291 1998 291–299
297
which will favor the DÕs2 and 3 transitions by
factors of 16 and 81, respectively, and thus counter-
act the harmonic oscillator selection rules. Even
though the mechanical anharmonicity of WO is small,
the overtones can be favored by electric anharmonic-
ity. The WO molecule may be fairly ionic, but at
larger distances it dissociates into neutral atoms and
its dipole is surely not a linear function of r.
The observed relaxation processes, where absorp-
tion of a single visible photon is followed by emis-
sion of a series of IR photons seems thus far to be
unique. It may be noted that similar processes, that is
UV pumping, followed by an internal conversion and
ground-state vibrational fluorescence are thought to
be responsible for the so-called unidentified infrared
state in the CN or the ‘a’ WO state is reached, the
process slows down further and in both molecules
extensive vibrationally unrelaxed, ‘hot’ emission, is
w
x
observed 13 . In CN it was shown that rather than
proceeding directly down the vibrational manifold of
the A-state, further relaxation occurs exclusively by
repeated crossings between the vibrational levels of
the A2 P state and the nearest X2 S ground-state
levels. Similarly it is almost certain that also in the
Ž7
.
lowest a P? excited state of WO, the relaxation
proceeds by an interelectronic mechanism. In the
light CN molecule, the A2 P spin–orbit constant is
y1
Ž
.
relatively small Asy52.64 cm , with relax-
ation between the components being extremely fast
and the splitting has little effect upon the relaxation
in the matrix. While in WO the spin–orbit effects are
surely much larger and the components of the widely
separated ‘septet’ state could be involved in the
relaxation, it appears likely that here ground-state
levels are involved, too.
Ž
.
emission bands UIE , with polycyclic aromatic hy-
Ž
.
drocarbons PAH being the suggested carriers
20,21 . The search for emission of these species in a
w
x
neon matrix might be of interest. The excellent
signal to noise ratio and clearly high quantum yields
of infrared fluorescence observed in WO raise the
question if such a behavior might not be much more
widespread, and if studies of vibrational emission
could not provide a useful general tool for charac-
terizing small metal oxides, carbides or nitrides.
After the relaxation reaches the vibrationless ÕX s
0 level of the lowest electronically excited state, only
one intramolecular non-radiative process is possible:
crossing into one of the nearby ground-state levels.
From that point on, the interelectronic channel is
closed and the molecule can only relax intrastate,
either non-radiatively, or by emitting infrared pho-
tons. Thus in the case of CN, the ÕY s4 X2 S
ground-state level is populated from ÕX s0 A2 P.
Further relaxation proceeds by sequential infrared
fluorescence and the ground-state ÕY s1–4 levels
appear strongly in emission. In W18 O the vibration-
3.6. Pathways of relaxation of WO in solid neon
One of the molecules for which strong infrared
emission has been detected, and whose relaxation in
matrices has been most extensively investigated is
probably the CN radical. Even though the properties
and electronic structures of the two molecules could
hardly be much more different and while WO has a
vibrational frequency about half of that of CN, the
relaxation pathways of the two molecules in the
matrix are remarkably similar. In the higher energy
region, the relaxation proceeds in both molecules by
an interelectronic process involving the vibrational
manifolds of several excited electronic states. Thus
Ž7
.
X
y1
less Õ s0 a P? level occurs 7529.39 cm above
the X ÕY s0 level, with the nearest ground-state
vibrational level being at 6857.7 cmy1, 671.69 cmy1
lower in energy. Quite analogous to the CN relax-
ation, as discussed above, the highest level from
which vibrational infrared fluorescence is observed
is ÕY s7. Clearly also here further relaxation appar-
ently occurs by sequential vibrational fluorescence.
As noted above, in contrast with the heavier
isotope, in W16O the a-state emission is weaker and
conversely, the vibrational emission considerably
more efficient. An explanation is easily found by
examining the vibrational level structures of the two
oxygen isotopic species, which also provides further
as in CN, the excitation zig-zags between the B2 S
2
w
x
and A P electronic states 14 , also WO cris-crosses
in the visible between the several electronic states
available at that energy. The non-radiative interelec-
tronic transitions are dominated by accidental level
degeneracies and the rates are governed by Franck–
Condon factors and the energy gap law.
Ž7
.
support for the relaxation in the lowest a P? state
When the lowest excited electronic state, the A2 P
proceeding, as in CN, via the ground-state vibra-