C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 3. Cu-Catalyzed Oxidative Amidation-Diketonization of 1 with 2aa
Scheme 1. Proposed Mechanism for the Direct Transformation
entry
R (1)
% yieldb (3)
1
2
4-Me-C6H4 (1a)
3-Me-C6H4 (1b)
2-Me-C6H4 (1c)
4-CF3O-C6H4 (1d)
Ph (1e)
2-naphthyl (1f)
4-MeO-C6H4 (1g)
4-F-C6H4 (1h)
4-Cl-C6H4 (1i)
4-Br-C6H4 (1j)
4-COOEt-C6H4 (1k)
n-butyl (1l)
77 (3aa)
50 (3ba)
40 (3ca)
36 (3da)
47 (3ea)
51 (3fa)
77 (3ga)
47 (3ha)
41 (3ia)
32 (3ja)
22 (3ka)
0 (3la)
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
In conclusion, we have demonstrated the first Cu-catalyzed
oxidative amidation-diketonization reaction of terminal alkynes
leading to R-ketoamides. O2 not only participates as the ideal
oxidant but also undergoes dioxygen activation under ambient
conditions via a radical process. This chemistry also offers a
valuable mechanistic insight into this novel Cu catalysis. Further
studies to clearly understand the reaction mechanism and the
synthetic applications are ongoing in our laboratory.
a The standard reaction conditions are given in Table 2, footnote a.
b Isolated yields.
survived well, leading to halo-substituted R-ketoamides (Table 3,
entries 8-10), which could be used for further transformations.
The transformation of 1a and 2a was tested in the presence of H218
O
(10 equiv). However, the 18O-labeled product 18O-3aa was not detected
(eq 3). Further investigation under an 18O2 atmosphere [using mass
spectrometry (MS) and high-resolution MS; see the SI] proved the
dioxygen activation, indicating that both oxygen atoms of the R-ke-
toamide originated from molecular dioxygen (eq 4).
Acknowledgment. Financial support from Peking University,
the National Natural Science Foundation of China (20702002,
20872003), and the National Basic Research Program of China (973
Program 2009CB825300) is greatly appreciated. We thank Prof.
Chaozhong Li, Jingfen Lu, Yufei Song, and Li-Zhu Wu for helpful
discussions. We thank Riyuan Lin in this group for reproducing
the results for 3ab, 3aj, 3ga, and 3ia.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and NMR
spectra. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
References
(1) Dioxygen has been used as an ideal oxidant. For some reviews, see: (a)
Punniyamurthy, T.; Velusamy, S.; Iqbal, J. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 2329.
In the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra monitored
with the addition of the radical trap 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline
N-oxide (DMPO), the signal corresponding to DMPO-OO(H) was
identified9 [see the “a” peaks in trace 1 of Figure 1; they are 12
classical peaks, and the calculated hyperfine splittings are g0 (2.006),
RN (14.4 G), RꢀH (13.3 G), and RγH (2.4 G)]. Furthermore, the above
signal disappeared with the addition of superoxide dismutase (SOD)
(trace 2 in Figure 1). The EPR results (for more details, see the SI)
indicate that the superoxide radical 7 (Scheme 1) is a key
intermediate involved in this kind of transformation.
A hypothesized mechanism of this transformation is shown in
Scheme 1. The proposed initiated complex 4 would insert alkyne
2a to give CuII intermediate 5. Next, imine radical 6 would
potentially be generated, and this would be followed by the
formation of the key intermediate, superoxide radical 7. Further
intramolecular cycloaddition to the imine would form the corre-
sponding aminyl radical 8.10 Intermediate 8 would then undergo
the second hydrogen abstraction facilitated by TEMPO or oxygen,
resulting in intermediate 9,11 and the subsequent fragmentation6a,12
of 9 would produce the desired R-ketoamide 3ea.
(b) Stahl, S. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3400.
(2) For some reviews, see: (a) Special issue on dioxygen activation by
metalloenzymes and models: Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 465-634. (b)
Limberg, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5932.
(3) (a) Klinman, J. P. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 6, 1. (b) Bollinger, J. M.,
Jr.; Krebs, C. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2007, 11, 151.
(4) Li, C.-J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 335, and references therein.
(5) (a) Hamada, T.; Ye, X.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 833. (b)
Zhao, L.; Li, C.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7075. (c) Gao, Y.;
Wang, G.; Chen, L.; Xu, P.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Han, L.-B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 7956.
(6) For the Pd-catalyzed cleavage reaction of alkynes with molecular dioxygen,
see: (a) Wang, A.; Jiang, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5030. For Pd-
catalyzed diketonization of alkynes with H2O, see: (b) Ren, W.; Xia, Y.;
Ji, S.-J.; Zhang, Y.; Wan, X.; Zhao, J. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1841.
(7) (a) Shi, Z.; Zhang, C.; Li, S.; Pan, D.; Ding, S.; Cui, Y.; Jiao, N. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4572. For our recent work on radical reactions,
see: (b) Zhou, W.; Zhang, L.; Jiao, N. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1982. (c)
Zhou, W.; Zhang, L.; Jiao, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7094.
(8) For some reviews of the application of TEMPO in synthesis, see: (a)
Vogler, T.; Studer, A. Synthesis 2008, 1979. (b) De Souza, M. V. N. Mini-
ReV. Org. Chem. 2006, 3, 155. (c) Bragd, P. L.; van Bekkum, H.; Besemer,
A. C. Top. Catal. 2004, 27, 49. (d) Geisslmeir, D.; Jary, W. G.; Falk, H.
Monatsh. Chem. 2005, 136, 1591. (e) Sheldon, R. A.; Arends, I. W. C. E.;
ten Brink, G.-J.; Dijksman, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 774.
(9) (a) Yamakoshi, Y.; Sueyoshi, S.; Fukuhara, K.; Miyata, N.; Masumizu,
T.; Kohno, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12363. (b) Finkelstein, E.;
Rosen, G. M.; Rauckman, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 4994. (c)
Samuni, A.; Murali Krishna, C.; Riesz, P.; Finkelstein, E.; Russo, A. Free
Radical Biol. Med. 1989, 6, 141. (d) Izzet, G.; Zeitouny, J.; Akdas-Killig,
H.; Frapart, Y.; Me´nage, S.; Douziech, B.; Jabin, I.; Mest, Y. L.; Reinaud,
O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9514. (e) Zhao, H.; Joseph, J.; Zhang,
H.; Karoui, H.; Kalyanaraman, B. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2001, 31, 599.
(f) Ou, Z.-Z.; Chen, J.-R.; Wang, X.-S.; Zhang, B.-W.; Cao, Y. New
J. Chem. 2002, 26, 1130.
(10) (a) Fallis, A. G.; Brinza, I. M. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 17543. (b) Bowman,
W. R.; Bridge, C. F.; Brookes, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 1.
(c) Stella, L. In Radicals in Organic Synthesis; Renaud, P., Sibi, M. P.,
Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2001; Vol. 2, p 407. (d) Guindon,
Y.; Guerin, B.; Landry, S. R. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2293. (e) Liu, F.; Liu, K.;
Yuan, X.; Li, C. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 10231.
(11) (a) Chen, Y.-X.; Qian, L.-F.; Zhang, W.; Han, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 9330. (b) Speier, G.; Pa´rka´nyi, L. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 218.
(12) (a) Sima´ndi, L.; Sima´ndi, T. M.; May, Z.; Besenyei, G. Coord. Chem. ReV.
2003, 245, 85. (b) Schank, K.; Beck, H.; Werner, F. HelV. Chim. Acta
2000, 83, 1611.
Figure 1. EPR spectra (X band, 9.7 GHz, room temperature) for reaction
mixtures in the presence of (1) the radical trap DMPO (2.5 × 10-2 M) and
(2) SOD (2.5 × 10-3 M) and DMPO (1.25 × 10-2 M).
JA908911N
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 1, 2010 29