However, due to the instability of thials and thiones, most
of the reports about TCR focused on the access to thioamides
and dithioesters.5 Although less attention was paid, the thials
and thiones having an R-proton could be used as useful
“Michael attackers” via the thermodynamically stable enethi-
ols. Thus, the appropriate substrate design may allow the
thione as an intermediate, which is trapped in situ by an
intramolecular electrophile.
As a first attempt, we chose ethyl 6-(allylthio)hept-2-en-
4-ynoate (1a)10 as the starting material and initiated our study
by testing the reaction of 1a in the presence of various bases
and examining the solvent effect. Weak bases such as
triethylamine or K2CO3 could not trigger the reaction whereas
strong bases such as t-BuOK or EtONa gave an unidentified
mixture. DBU (1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene) and DBN
(1,5-diazabicyclo[4.3.0]non-5-ene.) were suitable options and
gave ethyl 2-(4-allyl-5-methylthiophen-2-yl)acetate (2a) as
the product in acceptable yields at room temperature. Further
study showed that there were only slight solvent and
temperature effects (Table 1).
Sulfur-assisted propargyl-allenyl isomerization has been
a useful and efficient method to thio-allenes.6,7 The allene
moiety could be thought of as an “activated olefin”, which
generally enhances the diversity of the reaction possibility
compared with that of a normal olefin. Thus, it is hypoth-
esized that the allenyl allyl sulfides should undergo TCR
more smoothly than allyl vinyl sulfides, giving allyl-ene-
thiones as the intermediates (Scheme 1).
Table 1. Base and Solvent Effects on the Sequential Reactiona
Scheme 1
entry
base
Et3N
Et3N
K2CO3
K2CO3
solvent
THF
toluene
THF
temp (°C)
yield of 2a (%)b
NR
NR
NR
1
2
3
4
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
rt
Combining two or more reactions into one sequential
reaction, which usually involves a series of inter- or
intramolecular processes wherein the product of one
reaction is programmed to be the substrate for the next,
represents an elegant and efficient way to access novel
and complex molecules from simple, readily available
starting materials.8,9 However, the complexity and diversity
of the sequential reaction increases with the number of
cascades, which offers a more challenging and exquisite task
for organic chemists bent on reaction design. Herein we wish
to report a sulfur-assisted five-cascade sequential reaction,
wherein the in situ-generated allenyl allyl sulfides undergo
thio-Claisen rearrangement, leading to 2-allyl-2-ene-thiones.
That rearrangement is followed by a thione enolization, an
intramolecular Michael addition, and 1,5-proton migration/
aromatization to give allyl thiophenes as the final products.
toluene
NR
5
t-BuOK THF
unidentified mixture
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
EtONa THF
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
50
unidentified mixture
DBN
DBN
DBU
DBU
DBU
DBU
DBU
toluene
THF
toluene
THF
1,4-dioxane
Et2O
36
48
42
63
55
46
52
THF
a Conditions: substrate 1a (0.5 mmol) and base (0.6 mmol) in solvent
(2 mL) under a N2 atmosphere. b Isolated yields.
Inspired by this result, we examined the scope of the
reaction and obtained allyl thiophenes in moderate to good
yields under mild conditions (Table 2).
As shown in Table 2, the substituent group R3 must have
an R-proton, which allows the enolization of the intermediate
enethione to enethiol. Thus, starting materials with no
substituent, or tert-butyl and phenyl group on R3 cannot reach
the expected products (entries 22-24).
(5) (a) Liu, Z.; Qu, H.; Gu, X.; Min, B. J.; Nyberg, J.; Hruby, V. J.
Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4105. (b) Nowaczyk, S.; Alayrac, C.; Reboul, V.;
Metzner, P.; Averbuch-Pouchot, M. T. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7841. (c)
Liu, Z.; Qu, H.; Gu, X.; Min, B. J.; Nyberg, J.; Hruby, V. J. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 497. (d) Lemieux, R. M.; Meyers, A. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 5453.
It is notable that a substituent at C3 of the allyl group
prevents the reaction, probably because the transition state
of the key step (TCR) is sensitive to steric hindrance (Scheme
2).
(6) For recent allene reviews, please see: (a) Ma, S. Acc. Chem. Res.
2003, 36, 284. (b) Ma, S. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 2829. (c) Ma, S. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 701. (d) Kim, H.; Williams, L. J. Curr. Opin. Drug
DiscoVery DeV. 2008, 11, 870
.
(7) (a) Garratt, P. J.; Neoh, S. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 3255. (b)
Sromek, A. W.; Gevorgyan, V. Top. Curr. Chem. 2007, 274, 77. (c) Kim,
J. T.; Kel’in, A. V.; Gevorgyan, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 98.
(d) Dudnik, A. S.; Sromek, A. W.; Rubina, M.; Kim, J. T.; Kel’in, A. V.;
(10) The substrates (1a-u) could be easily prepared via a Sonogashira
reaction with iodoethenes (3) and allyl propargyl sulfanes (4) as the
materials: to a solution of 3 (2.0 mmol) and 4 (2.4 mmol) in 10 mL of
THF were added CuI (10 mg. 0.05 mmol) and PdCl2(PPh3)2 (35mg,
0.05mmol), then 1 mL of diisopropylamine under N2 atmosphere was added
at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with water,
extracted with Et2O, and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. After evaporation
of the Et2O, chromatography on silica gel (eluent: EtOAc/petroleum ether
) 1:20) of the crude product afforded 1, generally in a yield higher than
80%.
Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1440
(8) (a) Ho, T. L. Tandem Organic Reactions; John Wiley & Sons: New
York , 1992. (b) Tietze, L. F.; Brasche, G.; Gericke K. M. Domino Reaction
.
in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006
.
(9) (a) Posner, G. H. Chem. ReV. 1986, 86, 831. (b) Parsons, P. J.;
Penkett, C. S.; Shell, A. J. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 195. (c) Padwa, A.;
Weingarten, M. D. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 223. (d) Tietze, L. F. Chem. ReV.
1996, 96, 115
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 2, 2010
357