first example of a Pd-catalyzed decarboxylative benzylation
involving a nonenolate C-centered nucleophile.
0.1 M solution of imine 1a in dimethylacetamide (DMA)
with 3 mol % Pd(OAc)2 and 20 mol % rac-BINAP to be
optimal, affording the desired decarboxylative benzylation
product 2a in high yield.7 This high ligand-to-Pd ratio (∼6.7
vs 2.0 for conventional heating) proved critical for the
success of the microwave-accelerated conditions, presumably
by encouraging the formation of the requisite Pd(0)-ligand
complex within the relatively short time frame of the reaction.
Side products emanating from decarboxylative protonation
(3)8 and acetate serving as a competitive nucleophile for the
benzyl-Pd(II) intermediate (4) comprised the majority of
the remaining mass balance (Figure 1). Replacing Pd(OAc)2
We initially rationalized that incorporation of an
electron-withdrawing group into the benzyl ester would
facilitate insertion of Pd(0) into the ester C-O bond.5
Similarly, based on our previous experience,2d,4 we
predicted that electron-withdrawing substituents on the imine
component would accelerate decarboxylation and predispose
the resonance-stabilized R-imino anion intermediate toward
benzylation at the least substituted carbon. Accordingly, our
initial investigations began with (4-trifluoromethyl)benzyl
ester 1a. In accord with related studies by Kuwano and co-
workers,5e,f only bidentate ligands proved effective in
catalyzing the decarboxylative benzylation (Table 1). More-
Table 1. Reaction Optimizationa
Figure 1. Major side products for the decarboxylative benzylation
of imino ester 1a.
Pd source
(mol %)
temp
(°C)
yield
(%)b
with Pd(O2CCF3)2 did not afford a notable reduction in the
amount of side products from protonation (3) or (tri-
fluoro)acetylation.
ligand (mol %)
time
Pd(PPh3)4 (10)
Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (3)
Pd(OAc)2 (3)
s
110c 20 h
110c 20 h
110c 20 h
110c 20 h
110c 20 h
110c 20 h
110c 20 h
150c 20 h
150d 15 min
0e
0e
s
To evaluate the scope of this decarboxylative benzy-
lation reaction, the imine and ester moieties were varied
(Table 2). While ideal reaction temperatures/times were
substrate specific, heating to 150 °C for as little as 5 min
afforded complete conversion of imino ester 1a and
typically provided some conversion for all other substrates
investigated. The electronic composition of the benzyl
ester significantly impacted product distribution, with
electron-withdrawing groups reducing the preference for
desired imines 2 (entries 1-8). As an extreme comparison,
4-methoxybenzyl ester 1c afforded 85% of the desired
product 2c, whereas 4-nitrobenzyl ester 1f was converted
almost exclusively to 3 (32%), 4-nitrobenzyl acetate
(10%), and other unidentified side products (cf. entries 3
and 6). Gratifyingly, heteroaromatic benzyl esters proved
to be viable substrates for the decarboxylative benzylation
protocol (entries 7 and 8), suggesting potential application
toward the synthesis of 2-aryl-ꢀ-carboline alkaloid ana-
logues.9 To the best of our knowledge, this represents the
first example of the formation of a catalytically relevant
Pd(II)-3-methylindole species via insertion into the cor-
responding ester as well as the first example of an indole
participating in a Pd-catalyzed decarboxylative alkylation.
P(o-tol)3 (20)
dppe (20)
xantphos (20)
dppf (20)
rac-BINAP (20)
rac-BINAP (20)
rac-BINAP (50)
0e
0e
37e
49
61
60
70
78
0e
rac-BINAP (20) 150d 15 min
rac-BINAP (6)
150d 15 min
200d 45 min
Pd(O2CCF3)2 (10) rac-BINAP (50)
60
a Reaction conditions: imine (0.05 mmol), Pd catalyst, and ligand in
DMA (0.1 M). Unless otherwise noted, all reactions were run to complete
conversion of imine 1a. b Isolated yield. c Conventional heating. d Microwave
heating (CEM Discover, 300 W maximum power). e Starting material
recovered.
over, the bite angle of the bidentate ligands demonstrated a
significant impact on both the rate of reaction and the relative
percentage of side products generated.6 Extensive screening
of reaction conditions identified microwave irradiation of a
(5) (a) Legros, J.-Y.; Fiaud, J.-C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 2509. (b)
Boutros, A.; Legros, J.-Y.; Fiaud, J.-C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7329.
(c) Legros, J.-Y.; Toffano, M.; Fiaud, J.-C. Tetrahderon 1995, 51, 3235.
(d) Legros, J.-Y.; Primault, G.; Toffano, M.; Rivie`re, M.-A.; Fiaud, J.-C.
Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 433. (e) Kuwano, R.; Kondo, Y.; Matsuyama, Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12104. (f) Kuwano, R.; Yokogi, M. Org. Lett. 2005,
7, 945. (g) Kuwano, R.; Kondo, Y.; Shirahama, T. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2973.
(h) Kuwano, R.; Yokogi, M. Chem. Commun. 2005, 5899. (i) Narahashi,
H.; Shimizu, I.; Yamamoto, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 2008, 693, 283. (j)
Miller, K. J.; Abu-Omar, M. M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 1294. (k) Kuwano,
R. Synthesis 2009, 1049. (l) Lie´gault, B.; Renaud, J.-L.; Bruneau, C. Chem.
Soc. ReV. 2008, 37, 290.
(7) Under these conditions, R-BINAP did not confer any enantioselec-
tivity for the conversion of 1a to 2a, as monitored by chiral HPLC
analysis.
(8) The exact mechanism/source of protonation is unclear and currently
under investigation. Stoltz and Tunge have both reported similar difficulty
identifying the proton source for related decarboxylative protonation events:
Mohr, J. T.; Toyoki, N.; Behenna, D. C.; Stoltz, B. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 11348, and ref 3b.
(6) Bite angles in relevant Pd(II) complexes: xantphos ) 108.1°, dppf
) 102.2°, BINAP ) 96.0°, dppe ) 86°: (a) Johns, A. M.; Utsunomiya,
M.; Incarvito, C. D.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1828. (b)
Steffen, W. L.; Palenik, G. J. Inorg. Chem. 1976, 15, 2432.
(9) (a) Ohmoto, T.; Koike, K. The Alkaloids; Brossi, A., Ed.; Academic
Press: San Diego, 1989; Vol. 36, pp 135-150. (b) Love, B. E. Org. Prep.
Proced. Int. 1996, 28, 1.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 2, 2010
317