L. Iddon et al. / Tetrahedron 66 (2010) 537–541
541
(1H, dt, CH2 NþCH2), 3.71–3.79 (4H, m, CH2 NþCH2, NþCH2CH2CH2O
and 5-H), 3.79–3.83 (1 H, t, 2-H), 3.92–4.11 (4H, m, NþCH2CH2CH2O,
CH2 NþCH2), 4.67–4.71 (1H, d, J¼8.9 Hz, 1-H), 6.89–6.93 (3H, m, Ar)
and 7.22–7.28 (2H, m, Ar); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CD3OD): 23.6, 24.8,
25.6, 59.4, 62.4, 64.7, 66.2, 72.2, 73.3, 79.1, 79.8, 96.3, 116.0, 122.6,
131.0, 160.4 and 175.5; m/z (ES þve ion mode) 382 [MH]þ 100%. For
the NMR of intermediate 17, see Supplementary data.
78.9, 79.5, 95.8, 121.1, 124.5, 128.1, 131.5, 136.0, 149.5 and 175.3; m/z
(ES þve ion mode) 457 [MH]þ 100%.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Astra Zeneca plc and the EPSRC for funding
(CASE award to LI) and to Olaf Beckonert (Imperial College, London)
for 600 MHz NMR spectra.
4.6. [b-D-Glucopyranuronato-(N,N-dimethyl-3-(10,11-
dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5-ylidene))-1-
propanammonium 18
Supplementary data
The supplementary data associated with this article can be
To a solution of 14a (0.114 g, 0.14 mmol) in MeOH (2 mL) was
added 1 M NaOH (0.42 mL) at ꢁ10 ꢀC with stirring. After 3 h at this
temperature, TLC (5:3:2 EtOAc/IPA/H2O) showed complete re-
action: Amberlite Hþ resin (0.42 mmol) was added to give a pH of 7.
The resin was then filtered and washed with methanol, and the
methanol removed in vacuo: the residue was partitioned between
DCM (30 mL) and water (30 mL), the aqueous phase was separated
and extracted with more DCM (3ꢂ30 mL) and water was removed
in vacuo to yield the crude product. The residue was then purified
using reverse phase C18 silica gel, eluting with 100% H2O then
References and notes
1. Gibson, G. G.; Skett, P. Introduction to Drug Metabolism, 2nd ed.; Blackie/
Chapman and Hall: London, 1994; Chapters 1 and 2.
2. Zamek- Gliszczynski, M. J.; Hoffmaster, K. A.; Nezasa, K.; Tallman, M. N.;
Brouwer, K. L. R. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006, 27, 447–486.
3. (a) Kaspersen, F. M.; van Boeckel, C. A. A. Xenobiotica 1987, 17, 1451–1471;
(b) Stachulski, A. V.; Jenkins, G. N. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1998, 15, 173–186.
4. Ritter, J. K. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2000, 129, 171–193.
5. Stachulski, A. V.; Harding, J. R.; Lindon, J. C.; Maggs, J. L.; Park, B. K.; Wilson, I. D.
J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6931–6945.
6. Shaffer, C. L.; Gunduz, M.; Scialis, R. J.; Fang, A. F. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2007, 35,
1188–1195.
10–25% MeCN in H2O to afford the product 18 (0.064 g, 16%) as an
293K
amorphous glass; [
a
]
¼ꢁ5.80ꢀ (0.5 mg/mL in MeOH). Found:
D
[MH]þ m/z, 454.2227; C26H32O6N [MH]þ requires m/z, 454.2230;
nmax cmꢁ1 2500–3500 (br s), 2970, 2916,1611, 1485, 1447,1407,1094
(vs), 885 (m) and 743; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD at 323 K): 2.57–
2.72 (2H, m, NCH2CH2CH), 2.78–3.0 (2H, br m, CH2CH2), 3.15 (3H, s,
NCH3), 3.19 (3H, s, NCH3), 3.40–3.47 (3H, m, 3-H, NCH2, CH2CH2),
3.51–3.62 (2H, br s, NCH2, CH2CH2), 3.69–3.74 (2H, m, 2-H, 4-H),
3.88–3.98 (1H, br s, 5-H), 4.3–4.51 (1H, br s, 1-H), 5.73–5.82 (1H, t,
¼CH CH2) and 7.04–7.31 (8H, m, Ar); 13C NMR [150 MHz, CD3OD at
323 K]: 24.4, 33.2, 34.9, 64.2, 64.8, 71.5, 71.6, 77.8, 78.7, 79.0, 79.1,
94.7, 95.2, 124.9, 125.2, 127.3, 127.7, 128.8, 131.1, 131.4, 138.5, 140.7,
140.8, 141.6, 148.5 and 175.1 m/z (ES þve ion mode) 454 [MH]þ,
100%.
7. Franklin, R. B. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1998, 26, 829.
8. Green, M. D.; Tephly, T. R. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1998, 26, 860–867.
9. Borlak, J.; Gasparic, A.; Locher, M.; Schupke, H.; Hermann, R. Metab. Clin. Exp.
2006, 55, 711–721.
10. Nakazawa, T.; Miyata, K.; Omura, K. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2006, 34, 1880–1886.
11. Yan, Z.; Caldwell, G. W.; Gauthier, D. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2006, 34, 748–755.
12. Dalgaard, L.; Larsen, C. Xenobiotica 1999, 29, 1033–1041.
13. Zeng, S.; Qian, M. R. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 2006, 27, 623–628.
14. Araya, I.; Tsubuki, T.; Saito, T.; Numata, M.; Akita, H. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 55,
1039–1043.
15. Upadhyaya, P.; McIntee, E. J.; Hecht, S. S. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001, 14, 555–561.
16. Caldwell, W. S.; Greene, J. M.; Byrd, G. D.; Chang, K. M.; Uhrig, M. S.; deBethizy,
J. D.; Crooks, P. A.; Bhatti, B. S.; Riggs, R. M. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1992, 5, 280–285.
17. Hawes, E. M. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1998, 26, 830–837.
18. Luo, H.; Hawes, E. M.; McKay, G.; Midha, K. K. J. Pharm. Sci. 1992, 81, 1079–1083.
19. Mey, U.; Wachsmuth, H.; Breyer-Pfaff, U. Drug Metab. Dispos.1999, 27,1281–1292.
20. Fischer, D.; Breyer-Pfaff, U. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1995, 47, 534–538.
21. de Leon, J. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2003, 6, 57–72.
22. Kaku, T.; Ogura, T.; Nishiyama, T.; Ohnuma, T.; Muro, K.; Hiratsuka, A. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 2004, 67, 2093–2102.
4.7.
b-D-Glucopyranuronato-(N,N-dimethyl-3-(10,11-dihydro-
5H-dibenzo[b,f]azepin-5-yl)-1-propanammonium) 19
To a solution of 14b (0.115 g, 0.14 mmol) in MeOH (2 mL) was
added 1 M LiOH (0.42 mL) with stirring at ꢁ10 ꢀC. After 2 h at this
temperature, TLC (100% EtOAc) showed completion. The reaction
was quenched with Amberlite Hþ resin (0.42 mmol) to give a pH of
7. The resin was then filtered and washed with methanol, and the
methanol removed in vacuo: the residue was partitioned between
DCM (30 mL) and water (30 mL). The aqueous phase was separated
and extracted with more DCM (3ꢂ30 mL), then the water was
removed in vacuo to yield crude product, which was purified by
23. Chiu, S. H. L.; Huskey, S. H. W. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1998, 26, 838–847.
24. Dalgaard, L. Acta Chem. Scand. B 1983, 37, 923–928.
25. Isbell, H. S.; Frush, H. J. J. Org. Chem. 1958, 23, 1309–1319.
26. Baker, J. W. J. Chem. Soc. 1928, 1583; J. Chem. Soc. 1929, 1205–1210.
27. ‘Guidance for Industry: Safety Testing of Drug Metabolites’, Food and Drug Au-
28. Calligaro, D. O.; Fairhurst, J.; Hotten, T. M.; Moore, N. A.; Tupper, D. E. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1997, 7, 25–30.
29. Iddon, L.; Bragg, R. A.; Harding, J. R.; Pidathala, C.; Bacsa, J.; Kirby, A. J.;
Stachulski, A. V. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 6396–6402.
30. Olofson, R. A.; Martz, J. T.; Senet, J. P.; Piteau, M.; Malfroot, T. J. Org. Chem. 1984,
49, 2081–2082.
31. Brown, R. T.; Carter, N. E.; Mayalarp, S. P.; Scheinmann, F. Tetrahedron 2000, 56,
7591–7594. The -tetraisobutyrate is obtained as a crystalline solid in 60% yield
a-Chloroethyl chloroformate is the recommended reagent.
preparative HPLC using MeCN/H2O affording 19 (0.064 g, 57%) as an
293K
amorphous glass; [
a]
¼ꢁ18.25 (2 g mLꢁ1 in MeOH); Found: C,
b
D
61.0; H, 7.0; N, 5.4; [MH]þ m/z, 457.2343. C25H32O6N2.2H2O requires
C, 61.0; H, 7.4; N, 5.7%; C25H33O6N2 requires [MH]þ m/z 457.2339;
nmax cmꢁ1 2500–3500 (br s), 2920, 2850,1610, 1486, 1447, 1403 (m),
1094 (vs), 883 (w) and 755; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): 2.0–2.16
(2H, m, NþCH2CH2CH2), 3.05 (3H, s, NþCH3), 3.09 (3H, s, NþCH3),
3.18 (4H, s, CH2CH2), 3.37–3.54 (3H, m, 3-H and NþCH2CH2CH2),
3.69–3.71 (2H, m, 2-Hþ4-H), 3.73–3.84 (2H, m, 5-H and
NþCH2CH2CH2), 3.88–3.98 (1H, m, NþCH2CH2CH2), 4.51–4.55 (1H, d,
J¼8.9 Hz, 1-H), 6.92–6.97 (2H, m, Ar) and 7.11–7.20 (6H, m, Ar); 13C
NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): 22.4, 33.6, 48.6, 49,6, 49.7, 63.8, 71.9, 73.1,
from glucuronolactone. Subsequent anomeric deacylation is best achieved with
hydrazine/acetic acid.
32. Iddon, L. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool, 2009.
33. A most useful recent review of TEMPO oxidations is Vogler, T.; Studer, A.
Synthesis 2008, 1979–1993.
34. (a) Perrie, J. A.; Harding, J. R.; Holt, D. W.; Johnston, A.; Meath, P.; Stachulski,
A. V. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2591–2594; (b) Bowkett, E. R.; Harding, J. R.; Maggs, J.
L.; Park, B. K.; Perrie, J. A.; Stachulski, A. V. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 7596–7605.
35. Shi, Z.; He, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13596–13597.
36. (a) McCleary, C. W.; Rees, D. A.; Samuel, J. W. B.; Steele, I. W. Carbohydr. Res.
1967, 5, 492–495; (b) Stanford, D.; Stachulski, A. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48,
2361–2364.
37. Lin, T.-H.; Kovacs, P.; Glaudemans, C. P. J. Carbohydr. Res. 1989, 188, 228–238.