readily available starting materials.3 In this context, it
becomes clear that small organic molecules capable of
activating substrates through hydrogen bondings possess
tremendous potential in the development of novel asymmetric
processes.4 Although remarkable advances have been achieved,
the vast majority of hydrogen bonding catalysis is based on
either chiral phosphoric acids5 or thioureas,6 and strategies
based on simple hydrogen bonding donors (e.g., bis-
sulfonamide such as 3) remain largely unexplored (especially
their applications to cascade reactions7).8 From a practical
and atom-economic perspective, the exploration of the
hydrogen bonding catalysis by means of simple and readily
accessible small molecules is highly desirable.
As part of our ongoing project on the heterocycle-oriented
methodology development,9 we describe herein a novel
double Michael addition-aromatization reaction cascade of
2-propenylindoles with nitroolefins catalyzed by a chiral bis-
sulfonamide, which can efficiently generate three consecutive
stereogenic centers in one operation. Importantly, this
procedure allows a rapid access to diverse and structurally
complex tetrahydrocarbazole derivatives in excellent enan-
tioselectivities (up to 98% ee) and diastereoselectivities (up
to 99:1 dr). This is a prominent example of asymmetric
cascade reactions10 catalyzed only by a simple chiral
hydrogen bonding donor.
We initially studied the reaction of 2-alkenyl indoles 1a,b
and trans-ꢀ-nitrostyrene 2a in dichloromethane to examine
the feasibility of the cascade protocol (eq 1). When the
reaction was performed with 1a and 2a at room temperature,
two products, a formal [4+2] adduct 4a and Friedel-Crafts
alkylation product 5a, were obtained in 46% and 44% yield,
respectively. Encouraged by this result, we examined the
reaction in detail by varying R,1 R2, chiral hydrogen bonding
catalysts, solvents, and temperature in an attempt to increase
the yield of the tetrahydrocarbazole product.11 After an
extensive screen of the catalysts, bis-sulfonamide catalyst
3, which was easily prepared from simple and commercially
available chiral diamines,12 was identified as the most
promising catalyst. In particular, it was found that the reaction
provided stereochemically enriched tetrahydrocarbazole 4b
in 82% isolated yield, 92:8 dr, and 59% ee with the
corresponding alkylation product 5b only in trace amount,
when 1-methyl-2-propenylindole 1b was employed as the
substrate in the presence of 10 mol % of 3 at -40 °C (eq
1). Having further recognized water-saturated dichlo-
romethane as the solvent of choice and -78 °C as the optimal
reaction temperature for this transformation, we then exam-
ined a diverse range of additives in an effort to elevate the
stereoselectivity of the process (Table 1). While variation
of additives has a pronounced effect on the stereochemistry
of the reaction (Table 1, entries 2 and 3 vs entries 9 and
10), moderate levels of enantioselectivity were observed for
various Brønsted acids. Notably, the superior levels of
asymmetric induction and efficiency exhibited by catalytical
amounts of 3 and acetic acid in H2O-saturated CH2Cl2 at
-78 °C (Table 1, entry 7, 88:12 dr and 87% ee) prompted
us to use these conditions for further exploration.
(3) (a) Berkessel, A.; Gro˜ger, H. In Asymmetric Organocatalysis-From
Biomimetic Concepts to Applications in Asymmetric Synthesis; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, Germany, 2005. (b) Lelais, G.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Aldrichim.
Acta 2006, 39, 79. (c) List, B. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 5413. (d) Mukherjee,
S.; Yang, J. W.; Hoffmann, S.; List, B. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 5471. (e)
Christmann, M.; Braese, S., Eds. Asymmetric Synthesis-The Essentials;
Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2007. (f) MacMillan, D. W. C. Nature
2008, 455, 304. (g) Adair, G.; Mukherjee, S.; List, B. Aldrichim. Acta 2008,
41, 31.
(4) For selected reviews, see: (a) Schreiner, P. R. Chem. Soc. ReV 2003,
32, 289. (b) Takemoto, Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 4299. (c) Taylor,
M. S.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1520. (d) Akiyama,
T.; Itoh, J.; Fuchibe, K. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2006, 349, 999. (e) Doyle, A. G.;
Jacobsen, E. N. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 5713. (f) Akiyama, T. Chem. ReV.
2007, 107, 5744. (g) Yu, X.; Wang, W. Chem. Asian J. 2008, 3, 516.
(5) For pioneering studies, see: (a) Uraguchi, D.; Terada, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5356. (b) Akiyama, T.; Itoh, J.; Yokota, K.; Fuchibe,
K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1566.
(6) For pioneering studies, see: (a) Sigman, M. S.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4901. (b) Sigman, M. S.; Vachal, P.; Jacobsen, E. N.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1279.
(7) Tietze, L. F.; Gordon, B.; Kersten, G. M., Eds. Domino Reactions
in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006. For selected
reviews on cascade (domino) reactions, see: (a) Tietze, L. F.; Rackelmann,
N. Pure Appl. Chem. 2004, 76, 1967. (b) Guo, H.; Ma, J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 354. (c) Pellissier, H. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 2143. (d)
Nicolaou, K. C.; Edmonds, D. J.; Bulger, P. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 7134. (e) Enders, D.; Grondal, C.; Hu¨ttl, M. R. M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1570. (f) Hussian, M. M.; Patrick, J. W. Acc. Chem. Res.
2008, 41, 883. (g) Li, Z.; Chad, B.; He, C. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 3239.
(8) For an elegant example with use of 3 as the hydrogen bonding
catalyst, see: (a) Zhuang, W.; Hazell, R. G.; Jørgensen, K. A. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2005, 3, 2566. For other representative examples, see: (b) Kelly,
T. R.; Meghani, P.; Ekkundi, V. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 3381. (c)
Huang, Y.; Uni, A. K.; Thadani, A. N.; Rawal, V. H. Nature 2003, 424,
146. (d) Tonoi, T.; Mikami, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 6355. (e) Chen,
J.-R.; Lu, H.-H.; Li, X.-Y.; Cheng, L.; Wan, J.; Xiao, W.-J. Org. Lett. 2005,
7, 4543.
Experiments that probe the scope of both 2-propenylin-
doles (1) and nitroolefins (2) are summarized in Table 2.
Under optimized conditions, a wide range of aromatic
(10) For selected examples of organocatalytic cascade reactions with
bifunctional catalysts, see: (a) Wang, Y.; Liu, X.-F.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 3928. (b) Rueping, M.; Antonchick, A. P.; Theissmann, T.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3683. (c) Itoh, J.; Fuchibe, K.; Akiyama,
T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4796. (d) Wang, B.; Wu, F.; Wang,
Y.; Liu, X.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 768. (e) Biddle, M. M.;
Lin, M.; Scheidt, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3830. (f) Zu, L.-S.;
Wang, J.; Li, H.; Xie, H.-X.; Jiang, W.; Wang, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 1036. (g) Zu, L.; Xie, H.; Li, H.; Wang, J.; Jiang, W.; Wang, W. AdV.
Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 1882. (h) Wang, J.; Xie, H.; Li, H.; Zu, L.; Wang,
W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4177. (i) Gioia, C.; Hauville, A.;
Bernardi, L.; Fini, F.; Ricci, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9236.
(11) See the Supporting Informationfor details.
(9) (a) Li, C.-F.; Liu, H.; Liao, J.; Cao, Y.-J.; Liu, X.-P.; Xiao, W.-J.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1847. (b) Lu, L.-Q.; Cao, Y.-J.; Liu, X.-P.; An, J.; Yao,
C.-J.; Ming, Z.-H.; Xiao, W.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6946. (c)
Chen, J.-R.; Li, C.-F.; An, X.-L.; Zhang, J.-J.; Zhu, X.-Y.; Xiao, W.-J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2489. (d) Chen, C.-B.; Wang, X.-F.; Cao,
Y.-J.; Chen, H.-G.; Xiao, W.-J. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3532. (e) Lu, L.-
Q.; Li, F.; An, J.; Zhang, J.-J.; An, X.-L.; Hua, Q.-L.; Xiao, W.-J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9542.
(12) (a) Corey, E. J.; Imwinkelried, R.; Pikul, S.; Xiang, Y. B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5493. (b) Rolan, S.; Mangeney, P. Synthesis 1999,
228.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 5, 2010
1141