match the solar spectrum are now availble,7 and aggregation
of the adsorbed dyes could be prevented by introducing bulky
nonplanar stuctures.8 In contrast, few established strategies
for retardation of interfacial charge recombination are known.
Involvement of multiple long alkyl chains4b,9 and starburst
structures7b,c,10 in dye backbones are found to improve open
circuit voltage (VOC) since these bulky “functions” or the
thick dye aggregates formed can block the redox species,
i.e. passivate the TiO2 surface. However, construction of such
complex structures is synthetically challenging, and the VOC
values of these dyes remain mostly lower than that of the
Ru complex N719. More groundwork toward the reduction
of charge recombination for organic dyes is in urgent need.
Recent studies suggested that the generally low VOC values
for organic dyes were most likely suffered from complex
Figure 1. Molecular structures of sensitizers bearing bisProDOTs
(OR1, OR3, and OR6) and bithiophene (TT).
impressive performances in DSCs.4a,7g In addition, ProDOT
have a tetrahedral central carbon in the propylene ring at
which a variety of functional groups could be installed to
form three-dimensional (3D) branched structures12 which will
not only disfavor π-π packing but also block other
-
formation between dye molecules and I2 or I3 , or from
indirect electrostatic attraction of I3- by negatively charged
atoms in the dyes, whichever pathway increased the local
concentration of electron acceptor species in the vicinity of
TiO2 surface.6,11 We therefore envisage the possibility that
retardation of charge recombination could be effectively
realized by introducing appropriate steric hindrance to the
sensitizer backbone in order to alleviate the strong interation
between sensitizers and acceptor species in the electrolyte,
that is, passivation of the sensitizers, rather than the entire
TiO2 surface.
-
molecules (e.g., I3 ) from approaching. On the basis of the
above considerations, we could reasonably expect improved
optical properties, suppressed dye aggregation, and, most
hopefully, hindered charge recombination all by simply
replacing the commonly employed thiophene linker by
ProDOTs. Therefore, OR dyes containing dimeric dialkylated
ProDOTs (bisProDOT-R2) are engineered and tested in
DSCs. In particular, the sizes of alkyl groups are systemati-
cally varied to examine the role they play in the dyes’
photovoltaic performace. A bithiophene congener, coded
TT,10,13 is also synthesized for a comparison.
The synthetic route of OR dyes is shown in Scheme 1.
ProDOTs 1 were constructed by transetherification of com-
mercially available 3,4-dimethoxythiophene with the corre-
sponding 1,3-propanediols (Scheme S1, Supporting Infor-
mation (SI)). They were transformed into aromatic boron
derivatives 2b,c and brominated aromatic aldehydes 4b,c,
repectively, which were cross-coupled under Suzuki condi-
tions to give bisProDOT aldehydes 5 (aldehyde 5a was
prepared with a different method; see Scheme S2, SI).
Herein we report on the facile and expedient multifunc-
tionalization of triphenylamine dyes by introducing rationally
modified ProDOT building blocks to their π-conjugated
systems (OR dyes, Figure 1). ProDOT shares attractive
properties with 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) such as
high electron-richness and excellent coplanarity of their
oligomers,12 while sensitizers bearing EDOT have shown
(6) (a) O’Regan, B. C.; Lo´pez-Duarte, I.; Mart´ınez-D´ıaz, M. V.; Forneli,
A.; Albero, J.; Morandeira, A.; Palomares, E.; Torres, T.; Durrant, J. R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2906. (b) Miyashita, M.; Sunahara, K.;
Nishikawa, T.; Uemura, Y.; Koumura, N.; Hara, K.; Mori, A.; Abe, T.;
Suzuki, E.; Mori, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17874.
(7) (a) Shibano, Y.; Umeyama, T.; Matano, Y.; Imahori, H. Org. Lett.
2007, 9, 1971. (b) Hagberg, D. P.; Yum, J.-H.; Lee, H.; De Angelis, F.;
Marinado, T.; Karlsson, K. M.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Sun, L.; Hagfeldt, A.;
Gra¨tzel, M.; Nazeeruddin, M. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6259. (c)
Ning, Z. J.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, W. J.; Pei, H. C.; Liu, B.; Tian, H. J. Org.
Chem. 2008, 73, 3791. (d) Velusamy, M.; Justin Thomas, K. R.; Lin, J. T.;
Hsu, Y. C.; Ho, K. C. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1899. (e) Erten-Ela, S.; Yilmaz,
M. D.; Icli, B.; Dede, Y.; Icli, S.; Akkaya, E. U. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3299.
(f) Lin, J. T.; Chen, P. C.; Yen, Y. S.; Hsu, Y. C.; Chou, H. H.; Yeh, M. C. P.
Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 97. (g) Liu, W. H.; Wu, I. C.; Lai, C. H.; Chou, P. T.;
Li, Y. T.; Chen, C. L.; Hsu, Y. Y.; Chi, Y. Chem. Commun. 2008, 5152.
(h) Qin, H.; Wenger, S.; Xu, M.; Gao, F.; Jing, X.; Wang, P.; Zakeeruddin,
S. M.; Gra¨tzel, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9202. (i) Wang, Z. S.;
Cui, Y.; Hara, K.; Dan-Oh, Y.; Kasada, C.; Shinpo, A. AdV. Mater. 2007,
19, 1138. (j) Tian, H. N.; Yang, X. C.; Chen, R. K.; Hagfeldt, A.; Sun,
L. C. Energy EnViron. Sci. 2009, 2, 674. (k) Hao, Y.; Yang, X. C.; Cong,
J. Y.; Tian, H. N.; Hagfeldt, A.; Sun, L. C. Chem. Commun. 2009, 4031.
(8) (a) Kim, S.; Lee, J. K.; Kang, S. O.; Ko, J.; Yum, J. H.; Fantacci,
S.; De Angelis, F.; Di Censo, D.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Gra¨tzel, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16701. (b) Heredia, D.; Natera, J.; Gervaldo, M.;
Otero, L.; Fungo, F.; Lin, C.-Y.; Wong, K.-T. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 12.
(9) (a) Koumura, N.; Wang, Z. S.; Mori, S.; Miyashita, M.; Suzuki, E.;
Hara, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14256. (b) Kim, S.; Kim, D.; Choi,
H.; Kang, M. S.; Song, K.; Kang, S. O.; Ko, J. Chem. Commun. 2008,
4951. (c) Ning, Z. J.; Zhang, Q.; Pei, H. C.; Luan, J. F.; Lu, C. G.; Cui,
Scheme 1. Synthetic Route of OR Dyes
Y. P.; Tian, H. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 10307
(10) Justin Thomas, K. R.; Hsu, Y.-C.; Lin, J. T.; Lee, K.-M.; Ho, K.-
C.; Lai, C.-H.; Cheng, Y.-M.; Chou, P.-T. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 1830
(11) Marinado, T.; Nonomura, K.; Nissfolk, J.; Karlsson, K. M.;
.
.
Hagberg, D. P.; Sun, L.; Mori, S.; Hagfeldt, A. Langmuir 2010, 26, 2592
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 6, 2010
1205