MPA (1) and MTPA (3), as well as MTN(1)A (6)] to
differentially shield distant protons. Specifically, we have
examined the resonances of the terminal methyl groups in
the 1H NMR spectra of the series of homologous derivatives
13, derived from the symmetrical secondary carbinol precur-
sors 12 (Figure 2). These methyls, which are enantiotopic
(pro-R and pro-S) in 12, become diastereotopic in 13. Notice
that for this study, it makes no difference whether or not the
CDAs used were racemic.11
(for 13MTN(1)A-n) with the orange and green curves (for
13MPA-n and 13MTPA-n, respectively) (see Figure 2 inset). A
different way to state this is that there is a discontinuity in
the smoothness of the curves, most strongly evident in the
13MTN(1)A-n data set (blue). However, recall that the data are
plotted as the absolute value of ∆δ. This consideration led
us to hypothesize that the relative deshielding effect of the
pro-R vs pro-S methyl groups reverses for each of the series
(a crossoVer), causing the sign of ∆δ to change for each
series. This was testable, assuming we could access (i)
nonracemic MTN(1)A-OH (6-OH, Figure 1) and (ii) an
enantiomerically enriched and strategically deuterated ana-
logue of one of the larger (n g 7) carbinol precursors 12n.
We elected to prepare a nonracemic sample of partially
deuterated 10-nonadecanol 16 (the precursor to 13MTN(1)A-8
)
via the route summarized in Scheme 1. Racemic alcohol (()-
14 was resolved via PDC oxidation and asymmetric Noyori
reduction14 to give back (S)-14 having 95% ee. Alkyne
isomerization to the terminal alkyne 15 was followed by
deuteration to provide the alcohol-d4 16.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of (S)-10-Nonadecanol-1,1,2,2-d4 [(S)-16]
Figure 2. Trends in ∆δ values of the terminal methyl groups of
the CDA esters 13 derived from symmetric carbinols 12.
Acids (R)-6-OH and (S)-6-OH (Scheme 2) are the
nonracemic versions of MTN(1)A acid. These were prepared
from alkenol (()-17, which was O-methylated and oxida-
tively cleaved to give the primary alcohol (()-19. Partial
kinetic resolution was achieved with a lipase-induced acety-
lation. Although the levels of enantiopurity of the derived
samples of (R)-19 [via acetate (R)-20] and (S)-19 were
marginal [86% ee and 28% ee, respectively (from MTPA
analysis)], they were sufficiently high to serve our purposes.
Oxidation of each gave the carboxylic acids (R)-6-OH and
(S)-6-OH. Alternatively, we prepared racemic acid 6-OH
There are a number of noteworthy features seen in the
data for these series of compounds. The magnitude of the
∆δ values is greatest for MTN(1)A and least for MTPA. For
each CDA series, the maximum ∆δ value is observed when
n ) 1 (i.e., 13CDA-1 or the 3-pentanol derivative). There is
evidence of an “even-odd” effect12 in the step function (or
sawtooth) nature within each of the three series. At values
of n ) 6-8 (i.e., chain lengths of 15-19), the absolute value
of ∆δ reaches a minimum but, surprisingly, reemerges; that
is, the curves show a double maximium. We cannot help
but be reminded of the similar, textbook trends for rates of
cyclization vs ring size for R,ω-difunctional substrates,13
wherein transannular effects, maximal at medium ring sizes,
mitigate against the reactant residing in the reactive confor-
mation (i.e., with its termini in close proximity). This
situation is mitigated as the chain length is further increased.
An additional feature of the data intrigued us. At first
glance there is no obvious reason for the crossing of the blue
(by the method of Bourissou:15 1-NphthMgBr
+
CF3COCO2Et; K2CO3, MeI; KOH, EtOH), derivatized it as
the diasteromeric menthyl esters 6-m, and separated these
by MPLC (silica gel) to provide (R)-6-m (>99.8% de) and
(S)-6-m (94% de), which were used to collect the data
summarized in Table 1.
The preparation of the diastereomeric MTN(1)A esters
(S,R)- and (S,S)-21, each derived from nonracemic acid
chlorides prepared in situ and derived from nonracemic
samples of acids (R)-6-OH or (S)-6-OH, is outlined in
(11) For development of another unorthodox (“shortcut”) Mosher ester
analysis that was used on “nearly symmetrical” carbinols, see: Curran, D. P.;
Sui, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5411–5413.
(12) (a) Baeyer, A. Ber. Chem. Ges. 1877, 10, 1286–1288. (b) von
Sydow, E. Ark. Kemi 1955, 9, 231–254. (c) Breusch, F. L. Fortschr. Chem.
Forsch. 1969, 12, 119–184.
(14) Haack, K.-J.; Hashiguchi, S.; Fujii, A.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 285–288.
(13) E.g.: Smith, M. B., March, J. March’s AdVanced Organic Chemistry,
5th Ed.; J. Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 2001; pp 281-284.
(15) du Boullay, O. T.; Alba, A.; Oukhatar, F.; Martin-Vaca, B.;
Bourissou, D. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4669–4672.
1770
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 8, 2010