Effect of Long Chain Fatty Acids on Organocatalytic Aqueous Aldol Reactions
COMMUNICATIONS
80:20, flow rate 0.5 mLminÀ1, l=254 nm): tR =24.892 (syn
minor), 27.792 (syn major), 30.275 (anti, 2R,1’S), 39.300
(anti, 2S,1’R).
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge Dr. C. F. Barbas, III for a scientif-
ic discussion. We also wish to thank H. Suzuki and A. Sugita
for DLS and microscopy analyses. This study was supported
in part by a Grant-in-Aid from Scientific Research from the
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and SHISEIDO
Grant for Science Research.
Figure 5. Time course of average cumulant diameter of the
emulsion. Samples were not stirred during the time course
of the analysis.
References
[1] a) C.-J. Li, T.-H. Chan, in: Comprehensive Organic Re-
actions in Aqueous Media, 2nd edn., Wiley-Inter-
science, 2007; b) C. Pan, Z. Wang, Coord. Chem. Rev.
2008, 252, 736–750; c) J. Mlynarski, J. Paradowska,
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1502–1511; d) C. I. Herrerias,
X. Yao, Z. Li, C. J. Li, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2546–
2562; e) C.-J. Li, L. Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35,
68–82.
Experimental Section
Typical Procedure for the Aqueous Direct Aldol
Reaction using Catalyst 3 in the Presence of Fatty
Acid
[2] a) R. Zana, ACTHUNTGRNEUNG(Ed. ), in: Dynamics of Surfactant Self-As-
semblies: Micelles, Microemulsions, Vesicles, and Lyo-
tropic Phases, Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, 2005;
b) A. Elaissari, in: Colloidal Polymers: Synthesis and
Characterization, New York, Marcel Dekker Inc, 2003;
c) J. W. Gooch, ACHTUNTRGNEUNG(Ed. ), in: Emulsification and Polymeri-
zation of Alkyd Resins, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg,
2002.
To a mixture of the catalyst 3 (19.0 mg, 0.05 mmol) in water
(5 mL) aqueous trifluoroacetic acid solution (1.0M, 50 mL,
0.05 mmol) was added at 258C under air in a closed system.
The reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min, then cyclohexa-
none (8a, 1.05 mL, 10 mmol) and fatty acid (0.05 mmol)
were added. After additional stirring for 10 min, p-nitroben-
zaldehyde (9a, 770 mg, 5 mmol) was added. The reaction
mixture was stirred for 24 h. The reaction mixture was an
emulsion and the solid aldol product gradually formed from
the emulsion mixture. Water was removed by centrifugal
separation. If extraction was needed, the water phase was
extracted with ethyl acetate (3ꢁ1 mL), and organic extracts
were dried over Na2SO4. Diastereoselectivity and conversion
were determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude aldol
product after short column chromatography purification
(SiO2, 1 g) to remove the catalyst. Purification by flash
column chromatography (silica gel, hexane/AcOEt) gave
the aldol product 10a as a colourless solid.
[3] S. Kobayashi, T. Wakabayashi, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998,
39, 5389–5392.
[4] a) S. Kobayashi, C. Ogawa, Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12,
5954–5960; b) S. Kobayashi, K. Manabe, Acc. Chem.
Res. 2002, 35, 209–217; c) S. Kobayashi, M. Sugiura, H.
Kitagawa, W. W. L. Lam, Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 2227–
2302.
[5] a) N. Mase, Y. Nakai, N. Ohara, H. Yoda, K. Takabe, F.
Tanaka, C. F. Barbas, III, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
734–735; b) N. Mase, K. Watanabe, H. Yoda, K.
Takabe, F. Tanaka, C. F. Barbas, III, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 4966–4967.
The enantiomeric excess (ee) of 10a was determined by
chiral-phase HPLC analysis. The absolute configuration of
aldol products 10a was extrapolated by comparison of the
HPLC data with those of 10a whose absolute configuration
is known: Registry numbers: (2R,1’S) – 501417-31-8, (2S,1’S)
– 501417-28-3, (2S,1’R) – 351533-35-2, (2R,1’R) – 349628-69-
9, rel-(2S,1’R) – 71444-30-9, rel-(2R,1’R) – 71444-29-6, race-
mic – 61235-16-3; Rf =0.29 (anti product), 0.37 (syn product)
[6] After our report, a similar concept was reported. Y.
Hayashi, S. Aratake, T. Okano, J. Takahashi, T. Sumiya,
M. Shoji, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 5653–5655; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5527–5529.
[7] Recent reports of organocatalytic aqueous aldol reac-
tions, see also references cited therein; a) L. Zu, H.
Xie, H. Li, J. Wang, W. Wang, Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
1211–1214; b) S. S. V. Ramasastry, K. Albertshofer, N.
Utsumi, C. F. Barbas, III, Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1621–
1624; c) S. Luo, X. Zheng, J.-P. Cheng, Chem.
Commun. 2008, 5719–5721; d) D. Font, S. Sayalero, A.
Bastero, C. Jimeno, M. A. Pericꢂs, Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
337–340; e) Z. Tang, A. Marx, Angew. Chem. 2007,
119, 7436–7439; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7297–
7300; f) V. Maya, M. Raj, V. K. Singh, Org. Lett. 2007,
9, 2593–2595; g) J. Huang, X. Zhang, D. W. Armstrong,
1
(hexane:ethyl acetate=70:30); H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz):
d=1.20–1.95 (m, 5H), 2.05–2.20 (m, 1H), 2.26–2.72 (m,
3H), 3.23 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H, syn-OH), 4.10 (brs, 1H, anti-
OH), 4.91 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H, anti-CHOH), 5.49 (brs, 1H,
syn-CHOH), 7.41–7.59 (m, 2H, Ar), 8.16–8.25 (m, 2H, Ar);
HPLC (Mightysil, hexane/2-PrOH=90:10, flow rate
0.5 mLminÀ1, l=254 nm): tR =15.892 min (syn), 20.092 min
(anti); HPLC (CHIRALPAK AD-H, hexane/2-PrOH=
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 2791 – 2796
ꢀ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
2795