4414 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 114, No. 13, 2010
Debnath et al.
Conclusion
Herein, we have developed Fmoc-peptide functionalized
cationic hydrogel. Systematic analysis with special emphasis
on the structural aspects as well as the mechanism of the gelation
processes reveals that a minute architectural change at the
molecular level influences the self-assembling mechanism.
Noncovalent interactions including π-π stacking and intermo-
lecular hydrogen bonding were found to be the major responsible
factors for the gelation process. Several spectroscopic and
microscopic studies confirm the antiparallel ꢀ-sheet arrangement
of the self-assembled peptides in the gel phase. These Fmoc-
based cationic peptide exhibited efficient antibacterial activity
against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. De-
velopment of such antibacterial soft matters (biomaterials) from
Fmoc-protected amino acid/peptide-based cationic gelators
comprising efficient antibacterial activity will have immense
importance in the material science.
Figure 9. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) image of (a) control
bacterium E. coli; (b) E. coli after treatment with 200 µg/mL of
amphiphile 4.
effective killing of bacteria.20 Again, the swapping of L-
phenylalanine from N-terminal Fmoc unit to C-terminal pyri-
dinium group in compound 6 resulted in comparatively poor
antibacterial efficacy, possibly because of the loss of said
“threshold hydrophobicity”. Thus, antibacterial activity of these
Fmoc-peptide-based cationic amphiphiles is dependent on each
structural motif as well as on their sequence in the molecule.
Although exact mechanism of bactericidal effect remains to
be better understood, but in general it seems that the antimi-
crobial effect is originated from the ability of the cationic
compounds to penetrate the cell membrane of the microorgan-
isms.21 Positively charged peptide/amphiphiles are believed to
attack negatively charged cell membrane of microbes, which is
also entropically favorable as huge numbers of counterions are
released.22 Next, the hydrophobic moiety helps in the diffusion
of the small molecules by “self-promoted” transport across the
bacterial membrane resulting in release of cytoplasmic con-
stituents leading to the death of bacteria.13b,23 In general, it has
been observed that it is relatively easier to kill Gram-positive
bacteria rather than Gram-negative because the former have a
simple cell wall whose major constituent is peptidoglycan, a
polysaccharide. In contrast, Gram-negative has an additional
outer bilayer membrane composed of lipopolysaccharides and
phospholipids.13c However, the Fmoc-based cationic amphiphiles
used in the present study are almost equally effective in killing
both bacteria. To unravel the killing mechanism further in depth
investigation is required.
Acknowledgment. P.K.D. is thankful to Department of
Science and Technology, India for financial assistance through
Ramanna Fellowship (No. SR/S1/RFPC-04/2006). S.D., A.S.,
and D.D. acknowledge Council of Scientific and Industrial
Research, India for their Research Fellowships.
Supporting Information Available: Generalized synthetic
schemes, characterization for all the amphiphiles, temperature
dependence CD spectra and Live/Dead fluorescence micrograph
of E. coli and S. aureus before and after treating with 4, are
provided in the Supporting Information. This material is
References and Notes
(1) (a) Terech, P.; Weiss, R. G. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 3133. (b) Estroff,
L. A.; Hamilton, A. D. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 1201. (c) Tiller, J. C. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3072. (d) Sangeetha, N. M.; Maitra, U. Chem.
Soc. ReV. 2005, 34, 821. (e) Guan, J.; He, H.; Hansford, D. J.; Lee, L. J. J.
Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 23134.
(2) (a) George, M.; Weiss, R. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 489. (b)
Bhattacharya, S.; Srivastava, A.; Pal, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45,
2934. (c) Vemula, P. K.; John, G. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2218. (d) Vemula,
P. K.; Aslam, U.; Mallia, V. A.; John, G. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 138. (e)
Song, F.; Zhang, L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 13749.
To get the insight into the effect of amphiphiles on the
morphology of bacteria,13b,24 FESEM images of E. coli were
taken before and after the treatment with amphiphile 4 above
MIC at 200 µg/mL (Figure 9). The untreated bacteria E. coli
(Figure 9a) exhibited integrity of cell membrane. The incubation
of E. coli with amphiphile 4 for around 30-40 min causes a
significant change in their cell morphology where the SEM
image showed deformation in the membrane integrity of dead
E. coli (Figure 9b). The antibacterial activity of the representa-
tive amphiphile 4 was also studied by fluorescence microscopy
using commercially available Live/Dead BacLight bacterial
viability kit.13a,b The kit is composed of two nucleic acid binding
stains, known as SYTO 9 and propidium iodide. These dyes
have different cell penetration properties as well as different
spectral characteristics. SYTO 9 binds to the nucleic acid of
both living and dead cells and fluoresce green after excitation
with BP460-495 nm filter. Propidium iodide can only bind to
the nucleic acid of the dead cell and shows red fluorescence.
The untreated bacterial cells of E. coli and S. aureus exhibited
green fluorescence (Figures S3a and S3c, Supporting Informa-
tion), indicating that they were alive. After treating with the
200 and 50 µg/mL of 4 for E. coli and S. aureus cells,
respectively, only red fluorescence (Figures S3b and S3d,
Supporting Information) was observed that confirmed the killing
efficiency of the amphiphile.
(3) (a) Ko¨hler, K.; Fo¨rster, G.; Hauser, A.; Dobner, B.; Heiser, U. F.;
Ziethe, F.; Richter, W.; Steiniger, F.; Drechsler, M.; Stettin, H.; Blume, A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 16804. (b) Herres, A.; van der Pol, C.; Stuart,
M.; Friggeri, A.; Feringa, B. L.; van Esch, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
14252. (c) Nakashima, T.; Kimizuka, N. AdV. Mater. 2002, 14, 1113. (d)
Bieser, A. M.; Tiller, J. C. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3942.
(4) (a) van Bommel, K. J. C.; van der Pol, C.; Muizebelt, I.; Friggeri,
A.; Meetsma, A.; Feringa, B. L.; van Esch, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 1663. (b) Estroff, L. A.; Hamilton, A. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000,
39, 3447.
(5) (a) Yang, Z.; Xu, B. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2424. (b) Kohler, K.;
Forster, G.; Hauser, A.; Dobner, B.; Heiser, U. F.; Ziethe, F.; Richter, W.;
Steiniger, F.; Drechsler, M.; Stettin, H.; Blume, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 245. (c) Friggeri, A.; Feringa, B. L.; van Esch, J. J. Controlled
Release 2004, 97, 241. (d) John, G.; Vemula, P. K. Soft Matter 2006, 2,
909. (e) Kar, T.; Debnath, S.; Das, D.; Shome, A.; Das, P. K. Langmuir
2009, 25, 8639.
(6) (a) Suzuki, M.; Nanbu, M.; Yumoto, M.; Shiraib, H.; Hanabusa,
K. New. J. Chem. 2005, 29, 1439. (b) Suzuki, M.; Sato, T.; Shiraib;
Hanabusa, K. New. J. Chem 2006, 30, 1184.
(7) (a) Jayawarna, V.; Ali, M.; Jowitt, T. A.; Miller, A. E.; Saiani, A.;
Gough, J. E.; Ulijn, R. V. AdV. Mater. 2006, 18, 611. (b) Zhang, Y.; Gu,
H. W.; Yang, Z. M.; Xu, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13680. (c) Mahler,
A.; Reches, M.; Rechter, M.; Cohen, S.; Gazit, E. AdV. Mater. 2006, 18,
1365. (d) Fung, S. Y.; Yang, H.; Bhola, P. T.; Sadatmousavi, P.; Muzar,
E.; Liu, M.; Chen, P. AdV. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 74.
(8) (a) Smith, A. M.; Acquah, S. F. A.; Bone, N.; Kroto, H. W.;
Ryadnov, M. G.; Stevens, M. S. P.; Walton, D. R. M.; Woolfson, D. N.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 325. (b) Zhang, S. G.; Holmes, T.;
Lockshin, C.; Rich, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90, 3334. (c)