A. Miranda-Molina et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 21 (2010) 43–50
49
133.36, 133.26, 133.0, 130.12, 129.99, 129.83, 129.80, 129.68,
Acknowledgements
129.62, 129.11, 128.95, 128.66, 128.48, 128.40, 128.29, 128.19,
128.14, 96.81, 73.83, 73.12, 70.84, 70.63, 70.23, 70.13, 69.65,
69.49, 68.52, 68.18, 61.87. HRFABMS (positive mode), calcd for
C75H58O20: 1279.2510, found: 1279.3827.
The authors wish to acknowledge PAPIIT (project: IN226706-
3) and CONACyT (projects: 56431 and CB 82851) for the finan-
cial support. We also thank Fernando González Munoz and M.
C. María Elena Rodríguez Alegría, both from IBt-UNAM, for HPLC
analysis and for the production of T. maritima b-glucosidase,
respectively. Alfonso Miranda thanks CONACyT for Ph.D. fellow-
ship 189120.
5.6.2.
(2,3,4,5,6-penta-O-benzoyl)-myo-inositol 4a
Prepared from (0.0364 g, 0.12 mmol), benzoyl chloride
a-D-(2,3,4,6-Tetra-O-benzoyl)-glucopyranosyl-(1?1)-1D-
4
(0.27 mL, 2.32 mmol) and pyridine (0.4 mL). The reaction was
heated at 90 °C with 50 W and 13 psi for 30 min, to afford com-
pound 4a (77.85% yield) as a white solid after purification, crystal-
References
lized from acetone/methanol (1:3), mp 115–118 °C, ½a D20
¼ þ30:5
ꢂ
1. Michell, H. R. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 151.
2. Sureshan, K. M.; Shashidhar, M. S.; Praveen, T.; Das, T. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103,
4477.
3. Loewus, F. A.; Murthy, P. P. N. Plant. Sci. 2000, 150, 1.
4. Michell, H. R. Biochem. Soc. Symp. 2007, 74, 223.
5. Sato, M.; Matsuo, T.; Orita, N.; Yagi, Y. Biotechnol. Lett. 1991, 13, 69.
6. Kabat, E. A.; MacDonald, D. L.; Ballou, C. E.; Fischer, H. O. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1953, 75, 4507.
7. Noguchi, K.; Okuyama, K.; Ohno, S.; Hidano, T.; Wakiuchi, N.; Tarui, T.; Tamaki,
H.; Kishihara, S.; Fujii, S. Carbohydr. Res. 2000, 328, 241.
8. Newton, G. L.; Fahey, R. C. Arch. Microbiol. 2002, 178, 388.
9. Smith, C. K.; Hewage, C. M.; Fry, S. C.; Sadler, I. H. Phytochemistry 1999, 52,
387.
10. Müller, G.; Wied, S.; Crecelius, A.; Kessler, A.; Eckel J. Endocrinol. 1997, 138,
3459.
11. Müller, G.; Wied, S.; Piossek, C.; Bauer, A.; Bauer, J.; Frick, W. Mol. Med. 1998, 4,
299.
12. Frick, W.; Bauer, A.; Bauer, J.; Wied, S.; Müller, G. Biochem. J. 1998, 336, 163.
13. Salgado, H. Y.; Ramirez, M. L. G.; Vazquez, L.; Rios, M. Y.; Alvarez, L. J. Nat. Prod.
2005, 68, 1031.
14. Koto, S.; Hirooka, M.; Yoshida, T.; Takenaka, K.; Asai, Ch.; Nagamitsu, T.;
Sakuma, H.; Sakurai, M.; Masuzawa, S.; Komiya, M.; Sato, T.; Zen, S.; Yago, K.;
Tomonaga, F. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jap. 2000, 73, 2521.
15. Daniellou, R.; Palmer, D. R. J. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 2145.
16. Cid, M. B.; Francisco, A.; Lomas, M. M. Carbohydr. Res. 2004, 339, 2303.
17. Kornienko, A.; Marnera, G.; d’Alarcao, M. Carbohydr. Res. 1998, 310, 141.
18. Marnera, G.; d’Alarcao, M. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 1105.
19. Zapata, A.; León, Y.; Mato, J. M.; Nieto, I. V.; Penadés, S.; Lomas, M. M.
Carbohydr. Res. 1994, 264, 21.
20. Jaworek, C. H.; Iacobucci, S.; Calias, P.; d’Alarcao, M. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 331,
375.
21. Romero, G.; Lutrell, I.; Rogol, A.; Zeller, K.; Hewlett, E.; Larner, J. Science 1988,
240, 509.
22. Larner, J.; Price, J. D.; Heimark, D.; Smith, L.; Rule, G.; Piccariello, T.; Fonteles, M.
C.; Pontes, C.; Vale, D.; Huang, L. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 3283.
23. Weijers, C. A. G. M.; Franssen, M. C. R.; Visser, G. M. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008, 26,
436.
24. Field, M. C. Glycobiology 1997, 7, 161.
25. Lomas, M. M.; Mosquera, F. M.; Khiar, N. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 23,
1539.
(c 2.58, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d = 8.5–7.0 (m, 45H,
ArH), 6.36 (dd, 1H, J2,1 = 2.8, J2,3 = 3.2 Hz, H-2), 6.32 (t, 1H,
J6,1 = 10.4, J6,5 = 10.4 Hz, H-6 or H4), 6.22 (dd, 1H, J4,3 = 10.0,
0
0
0
0
J4,5 = 10.4 Hz, H-4 or H6), 5.97 (dd, 1H, J3 ,2 = 9.6, J3 ,4 = 10.0 Hz,
H-30), 5.82 (dd, 1H, J5,4 = 10.0, J5,6 = 10.4 Hz, H-5), 5.73 (dd, 1H,
0
0
J3,2 = 3.2, J3,4 = 10.6 Hz, H-3 or H-1), 5.66 (dd, 1H, J4 ,3 = 9.6,
J4 ,5 = 10.0 Hz, H-40), 5.59 (d, 1H, J1 ,2 = 4.0 Hz, H-10), 5.22 (dd, 1H,
0
0
0
0
J2 ,1 = 3.6, J2 ,3 = 10.4 Hz, H-20), 4.78 (ddd, J5 ,6 a = 3.2, J5 ,6 b = 4.8,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
J5 ,4 = 8.6, H-50), 4.67 (dd, 1H, J1,2 = 3.2, J1,6 = 8.4 Hz, H-1 or H-3),
0
0
4.64 (m, 1H, H-60a), 4.54 (dd, J6 b,5 = 4.0, J6 b,6 a = 12.8, H-6b0). 13C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d = 166.34, 166.31, 165.64, 165.55,
165.33, 165.26, 165.17, 165.12, 164.80, 133.85, 133.55, 133.39,
133.26, 133.21, 133.14, 133.09, 132.92, 130.42, 130.06, 130.01,
129.98, 129.92, 129.81, 129.62, 129.40, 129.28, 129.08, 129.0,
128.84, 128.72, 128.61, 128.51, 128.45, 128.29, 128.20, 128.02,
98.00, 74.13, 72.02, 71.31, 71.02, 70.78, 70.78, 70.20, 70.05,
69.23, 62.81. HRFABMS, calcd for C75H58O20: 1279.2510, found:
1279.4065. X-ray crystallographic structure in Figure 3.48
0
0
0
0
5.7. Biological evaluation
5.7.1. Experimental animals
Adult male BALB/c mice with a body weight ranging from 20 to
22 g were used. All animals had free access to food and water and
were kept on a 12/12 h light-dark cycle.
5.7.2. TPA-induced mouse ear oedema
Oedema was induced by topical application of 2.5
(12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate) dissolved in 20
tone to the right ear of ten mice. Solutions of compounds 3 and 4
(1.5 mg/kg) were dissolved in 20 L of physiological solution and
lg of TPA
lL ace-
26. Larner, J.; Huang, L. C.; Schwartz, C. F. W.; Oswald, A. S.; Shen, T.-Y.; Kinter, M.;
Tang, G.; Zeller, K. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1988, 151, 1416.
27. Shibuya, T.; Miwa, Y.; Nakano, M.; Yamauchi, T.; Chaen, H.; Sakai, S.; Kurimoto,
M. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2003, 57, 56.
28. Yamamoto, T.; Watanabe, H.; Nishimoto, T.; Aga, H.; Kubota, M.; Chaen, H.;
Fukuda, S. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2006, 101, 427.
29. Kurashima, K.; Fujii, M.; Ida, Y.; Akita, H. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2003, 26, 87.
30. Sauerbrei, B.; Thiem, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 201.
31. Bridiau, N.; Taboubi, S.; Marzouki, N.; Legoy, M. D.; Maugard, T. Biotechnol.
Prog. 2006, 22, 326.
l
were applied 30 min before TPA administration. A group of five
mice were treated with the standard drug corticosterone (10 mg/kg)
as reference. Left ears of five mice (control) were treated with
20
lL acetone only. The ear swelling was measured with a micro-
metre before and at 0.5, 1, 2 and 2.5 h after TPA application. The
oedema was expressed as the increase in thickness in lm.
32. Hart, J.; Falshaw, A.; Farkas, E.; Thiem, J. Synlett 2001, 3, 329.
33. Gorin, P. A. J.; Horitsu, K.; Spencer, J. F. T. Can. J. Chem. 1965, 43, 2259.
34. Hart, J. B.; Kröger, L.; Falshaw, A.; Falshaw, R.; Farkas, E.; Thiem, J.; Win, A. L.
Carbohydr. Res. 2004, 339, 1857.
35. Sato, M.; Nakamura, K.; Nagano, H.; Yagi, Y.; Koizumi, K. Biotechnol. Lett. 1992,
14, 659.
36. Blackwood, A. D.; Bucke, C. Enzyme Microbial Technol. 2000, 27, 704.
37. Zain, W. S. W., Md.; Illias, R., Md.; Salleh, M., Md.; Hassan, O.; Rahman, R. A.;
Hamid, A. A. Biochem. Eng. 2007, 33, 26.
38. Monthieu, C.; Gubert, A.; Taravel, F. R.; Nardin, R.; Combes, D. Biocatal.
Biotransfor. 2003, 21, 7.
5.7.3. Carrageenan-induced mouse paw oedema
Oedema was induced in the right hind paw by subplantar injec-
tion of carrageenan (0.1% w/v in physiological solution, 20 L) of
five mice. Compounds 3 and 4, dissolved in physiological solution
were administered ip at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg, 30 min before carra-
geenan injection. A group received the reference drug corticoste-
rone (10 mg/kg, po). The left paw volumes were measured with a
micrometre at zero time prior to carrageenan and at 0.5, 1, 2 and
2.5 h after inflammation induction. The oedema was expressed as
the increase in thickness.
l
39. Van Der Veen, B. A.; Bart, A.; Alebeek, V.; Gert-Jan, W. M.; Uitdehaag, J. C. M.;
Dijkstra, B. W.; Dijkhuizen, L. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 658.
40. Park, K. H.; Kim, M. J.; Lee, H. S.; Han, N. S.; Kim, D.; Robyt, J. F. Carbohydr. Res.
1998, 313, 235.
41. Svensson, D.; Ulvenlund, S.; Adlercreutz, P. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009.
42. Park, D. C.; Kim, T. K.; Lee, Y. H. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1998, 22, 217.
43. Irvine, R. F.; Schell, M. J. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2, 327.
44. Agranoff, B. W. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 21121.
5.7.4. Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as a mean SEM. Data were analyzed by using
Dunnett’s test post Anova test. P values <0.05 were considered to
be significant.