4704
R. Ducray et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 4702–4704
Table 3
Table 4
Inhibition of IGF-1R kinase activity and inhibition of receptor autophosphorylation in
cell of compounds 3–10
Inhibition of IGF-1R kinase activity and inhibition of receptor autophosphorylation in
cell of compounds
N
N
R
N
R
N
N
Cl
N
N
N
Cl
N
N
O
N
N
O
a
a
Compd
R
IGF-1R IC50
M)
Cell IC50
M)
hERG IC50
M)
(
l
(l
(l
a
a
Compd
R
IGF-1R IC50
M)
Cell IC50
M)
hERG IC50
M)
(
l
(l
(l
O
33
34
35
0.051
0.06
0.141
0.031
0.160
4.3
4.8
5.1
N
N
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
H
0.020
0.015
0.012
0.017
0.009
0.027
0.008
0.011
0.008
0.009
0.020
0.017
0.040
0.035
0.019
0.033
0.249
0.018
0.027
0.047
4.6
3.7
12
9.4
>33
>33
>33
16
CH2CH2OH
CH2CONMe2
CH2CH2SO2Me
SO2Me
CO2Me
CONH2
CONMe2
COCH2OH
(S)-
HN
O
N
O
0.083
N
36
0.12
1.06
1.3
14
8.1
N
O
COCH(Me)OH
(R)-
a
IC50 values are means of at least two experiments, standard deviation is less
28
0.013
0.016
15
than 2.
COCH(Me)OH
COCH2NH2
COCH2NHMe
(S)-
COCH(Me)NH2
(R)-
29
30
31
0.005
0.004
0.005
0.011
0.009
0.009
16
9.5
9.4
and 36 were less active against IGF-1R than their para-counterparts
(10 and 12 respectively) but had a similar hERG IC50
.
In summary, we have explored the structure–activity relation-
ship around our lead compound 1. We have identified compound
16 having a superior IGF-1R inhibitory activity in a cellular assay
and a higher free fraction in human plasma. However this com-
pound showed a higher affinity for the hERG channel, which pre-
cluded its selection as a possible candidate drug.
32
0.006
0.013
14
COCH(Me)NH2
a
IC50 values are means of at least two experiments, standard deviation is less
than 2.
activity (2 fold decrease). This result, in addition to the small differ-
ence in hERG inhibition between compounds 2 and 6 and their basic
analogues 3 and 7, shows the lack of correlation between hERG inhi-
bition and basicity in this series.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the following people for their contribu-
tion to the synthesis of the compounds described: Myriam Didelot,
Hervé Germain, Maryannick Lamorlette, Mickael Maudet and Mor-
gan Ménard.
Compound 17 was a less potent IGF-1R inhibitor than 15 (10
fold reduction in enzyme and cellular assays). This is possibly a
consequence of the different shapes of the bicycles as the 3-oxa-
7,9-diaza-bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane is likely to be in a ‘chair-boat’ con-
formation stabilised by an internal hydrogen bond, as opposed to
the ‘chair-chair’ conformation of the oxa-bispidine (Fig. 1). In addi-
tion, the calculated log P values from the measured pKa and log D
(pH 7.4) show a higher intrinsic lipophilicity for 15 compared to
17. This reflects a higher solvation state for the 3-oxa-7,9-diaza-
bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane moiety in water, presumably detrimental to
the ligand affinity for the ATP binding site of the kinase.
The replacement of the piperazine ring in compound 1 having
proved unsuccessful, we pursued our investigation by modifying
the acetyl group (Table 3). The unsubstituted piperazine derivative
18 was as potent as compound 1 but displayed some hERG affinity.
Reducing the piperazine basicity using a nitrogen substituent with
a strong inductive effect (compd 19–21) did not remove hERG
activity. Sulfonamide derivative 22, carbamate 23 and urea 24
were inactive against hERG but only 22 was as potent as 1, while
References and notes
1. (a) Gualberto, A.; Pollak, M. Oncogene 2009, 28, 3009; (b) Gualberto, A.; Pollak,
M. Curr. Drug Targets 2009, 10, 923.
2. (a) Mulvihill, M. J.; Cooke, A.; Rosenfeld-Franklin, M.; Buck, E.; Foreman, K.;
Landfair, D.; O’Connor, M.; Pirritt, C.; Sun, Y.; Yao, Y.; Arnold, L. D.; Gibson, N.
W.; Ji, Q.-S. Future Med. Chem. 2009, 1, 1153; (b) Wittman, M. D.; Carboni, J. M.;
Yang, Z.; Lee, F. Y.; Antman, M.; Attar, R.; Balimane, P.; Chang, C.; Chen, C.;
Discenza, L.; Frennesson, D.; Gottardis, M. M.; Greer, A.; Hurlburt, W.; Johnson,
W.; Langley, D. R.; Li, A.; Li, J.; Liu, P.; Mastalerz, H.; Mathur, A.; Menard, K.;
Patel, K.; Sack, J.; Sang, X.; Saulnier, M.; Smith, D.; Stefanski, K.; Trainor, G.;
Velaparthi, U.; Zhang, G.; Zimmermann, K.; Vyas, D. M. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52,
7360; (c) Wittman, M. D.; Velaparthi, U.; Dolatrai, M. V. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem.
2009, 44, 281.
3. Ducray, R.; Simpson, I.; Jung, F. H.; Nissink, W.; Kenny, P.; Fitzek, M.; Walker, G.
E.; Ward, L. T.; Hudson, K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. in press, doi:10.1016/
4. Detailed experimental procedures and 1H NMR characterizations can be found
in the patent application WO-2010/049731.
showing
a lower aqueous solubility (<0.6 lM compared to
5. For the preparation of 3-(2,5-dichloropyrimidin-4-yl)-imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine
see: Ducray, R.; Boutron, P.; Didelot, M.; Germain, H.; Lach, F.; Lamorlette, M.;
Legriffon, A.; Maudet, M.; Ménard, M.; Pasquet, G.; Renaud, F.; Simpson, I.;
Young, G. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 4755.
1.4 M for 1). Dimethylurea 25 and glycolic or lactic acid deriva-
l
tives 26–28 had some hERG affinity without any IGF-1R activity
improvement over 1. Likewise, compounds derived from glycine,
sarcosine and alanine (29–32) displayed good potency against
IGF-1R but were moderately active in the hERG assay.
Finally, moving the aniline substituent from the para to the meta-
position only provided compounds with inferior properties (Table 4).
Compound 33 was less active than 1 in the IGF-1R assays and dis-
played some affinity for the hERG channel. The unsubstituted piper-
azine 34 had a profile similar to its analogue 18 and compounds 35
6. For
a description of our enzymatic and cellular assays measuring IGF-1R
inhibition see ref.4. IC50 against hERG ion channel have been determined using
the IonWorks electrophysiology platform (Schroeder, K.; Neagle, B.; Trezise, D.
J.; Worley, J. Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2003, 8, 50).
7. Breuning, M.; Steiner, M. Synthesis 2007, 1702.
8. Andrew, C. L.; Klemm, A. R.; Lloyd, J. B. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1997, 71.
9. (a) Douglass, J. E.; Ratliff, T. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33, 355; (b) Toom, L.; Kutt, A.;
Kaljurand, I.; Leito, I.; Ottosson, H.; Grennberg, H.; Gogoll, A. J. Org. Chem. 2006,
71, 7155.
10. Revesz, L.; Blum, E.; Wicki, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 5577.