Disease index
Lesioned area on leaf disk
Notes and references
1 F. Wakui, K. Harimaya, M. Iwata, R. Sashita, N. Chiba and T. Mikawa,
Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho, JP 07,126,211, May 16, 1995, Appl. Oct. 29,
1993; Chem. Abstr., 1995, 123, 105272b.
2 (a) H. Kobayashi, S. Meguro, T. Yoshimoto and M. Namikoshi,
Tetrahedron, 2003, 59, 455; (b) M. Namikoshi, H. Kobayashi, T.
Yoshimoto, S. Megro and K. Akano, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 2000, 48,
1452; (c) M. Namikoshi, H. Kobayashi, T. Yoshimoto and T. Hosoya,
J. Antibiot., 1997, 50, 890.
3 (a) B. Williamson, B. Tudzynski, P. Tudzynski and J. A. L. Van
Kan, Mol. Plant Pathol., 2007, 8, 561; (b) Y. Elad and K. Evensen,
Phytopathology, 1995, 85, 637.
4 B. A. Latorre, V. Flores, A. M. Sara and A. Roco, Plant. Dis., 1994, 78,
990.
5 R. J. Grayer and T. Kokubun, Phytochemistry, 2001, 56, 253.
6 (a) T. Suzuki, K. Usui, Y. Miyake, M. Namikoshi and M. Nakada, Org.
Lett., 2004, 6, 553; (b) N. Hayashi, T. Suzuki, K. Usui and M. Nakada,
Tetrahedron, 2009, 65, 888.
7 (a) N. Hayashi and M. Nakada, Tetrahedron Lett., 2009, 50, 232Also see
the asymmetric total synthesis of (+)-carneic acid A: (b) S. Yamakoshi,
N. Hayashi, T. Suzuki and M. Nakada, Tetrahedron Lett., 2009, 50,
5372.
0
1
2
3
No lesioned area was recognized.
Lesioned area was very small.
Lesioned area was formed less than control.
Lesioned area was formed as same as control.
(dimensions: 4.5 ¥ 50 mm) using 15%–100% CH3CN in H2O over
10 min (flow rate: 0.8 mL/min) to evaluate the residual ratio. The
residual ratio was calculated by using following equation. rediual
ratio (%) = (area exposed for 24 h)/(area not exposed)
Cabbage leaf disk test
A cabbage leaf disk test was carried out by using four disks cut
from cabbage leafs (cv. Kinkei 201 EX) with a cork borer (14 mm
in diameter); the leaves were grown in a greenhouse for 1 month.
The leaf disks were placed in a 24-well plate (Cellstarꢀ, No.
R
662160, Greiner Bio-One GmbH). The test compound solution
containing 10% acetone and 0.05% v/v spreader (Neoesterin,
Kumiai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.) was sprayed on the four
cabbage leaf disks (8 mL/disk), and the disks were allowed to dry
naturally. A conidia suspension (1 ¥ 105 conidia/mL) of B. cinerea
containing 10% w/v potato tuber extract, 2.5% w/v dextrose, and
0.125% w/v inosine was inoculated into the leaf disks using a spray
gun (2 mL per 24-well plate). After incubation for 3 days at 21 ◦C
in a humid and dark chamber, the disks were assessed visually
for lesioned areas and the disease index was obtained from the
following table below.
8 (a) D. B. Dess and J. C. Martin, J. Org. Chem., 1983, 48, 4155; (b) M.
Frigerio, M. Santagostino and S. Sputore, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64,
4537.
9 Crystallographic data for 5. C14H20O3, M = 236.31, orthorhombic,
3
˚
˚
a = 7.4309(10), b = 10.1138(12), c = 16.7778(18)A, V = 1260.9(3)A ,
T = 123.1 K, P21 (#19), Z = 4, Dx = 1.245 g cm-3, Mo-Ka radiation,
12303 measured reflections, 2884 independent reflections (Rint = 0.038),
R1 = 0.0488 for 2254 data with I > 2s(I), wR2 = 0.1278 (all data).
Fig. 2 shows the relative stereochemistry of 5. Crystallographic data
(excluding structure factors) for the structure in this paper have
been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data centre as
supplementary publication numbers CCDC 751813. Copies of the
data can be obtained, free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12
Union Road, Cambridge CB2 IEZ, UK [fax: +44 (0)1223 336033 or
e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk]. The atom numbers in Fig. 2 do not
correspond to those in Fig. 1 and Schemes 1–4.
Protective value: The protective value was calculated by using
the following equation. The disease index is the mean of the disease
indices of the four leaf disks. Protective value = ((disease index
of control)–(disease index of test compound))/(disease index of
control) ¥ 100.
10 E. J. Corey and P. L. Fuchs, Tetrahedron Lett., 1972, 13, 3769.
11 P. Wipf and S. Lim, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1993, 32, 1068.
12 E. Negishi, Pure Appl. Chem., 1981, 53, 2333and references therein.
13 R. H. Crabtree and G. E. Morris, J. Organomet. Chem., 1977, 135,
395.
14 (a) Reviews, see: B. D. Sherry and A. Fu¨rstner, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008,
41, 1500; (b) A. Fu¨rstner and R. Martin, Chem. Lett., 2005, 34, 624;
(c) C. Bolm, J. Legros, J. L. Paih and L. Zani, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104,
6217; (d) G. Cahiez and H. Avedissian, Synthesis, 1998, 1199. The
first report regarding the iron-catalyzed coupling reactions of Grignard
reagents with alkenyl halides: (e) M. Tamura and J. K. Kochi, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1971, 93, 1487.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by a Waseda University Grant for
Special Research Projects, a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
(B), and the Global COE program “Center for Practical Chemical
Wisdom” by MEXT.
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 1821–1825 | 1825
©