Prinz et al.
JOCNote
data (ITP; IC50=5.3 ( 1.2 μM, Figure 1B). Therefore we
conclude that inhibition of tubulin polymerization is a plau-
sible explanation for the antiproliferative potency of 6.
Among the 1-phenylaceanthrylene-2,6-diones, only 9 also
inhibited tubulin polymerization (9, ITP; IC50 = 6.6 (
0.7 μM; 7, 8 ITP; IC50>10 μM) and had antiproliferative
potencies comparable to 6 (9, IC50 K562 1.7 μM; 7, 8, IC50
K562>80 μM).
In conclusion we have presented the first protocol for the
synthesis of 2,6-aceanthrylenedione, which was demon-
strated to be a biologically active compound revealing a re-
markably increased antiproliferative potency as compared
with simple anthraquinone. This property is related to the
inhibition of tubulin polymerization. In addition, we showed
that the synthesis of 1-phenylaceanthrylene-2,6-diones could
proceed via the 2,6-aceanthrylenedione. Given the impor-
tance of anthraquinones and related quinones for anticancer
chemotherapy, we hope that the novel 2,6-aceanthrylene-
dione, which can be regarded as a cyclic vinylog of anthra-
quinone, might be of interest for the development of novel
anticancer drugs. Further studies around this interesting
compound are in progress and will be reported in due course.
1-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)aceanthrylene-2,6-dione (8). Method
A. Anhydrous AlCl3 (3.20 g, 24.00 mmol) was added in one
portion to a suspension of crude 5 (2.14 g, 8 mmol) in DCE
(30 mL). Then, a solution of 1,2-dimethoxybenzene (3.22 g,
24 mmol) in 5 mL of DCE was added dropwise. After the dark
red solution stirred for 4 h at rt (TLC control, CH2Cl2), the
reaction mixture was poured into water (300 mL)/6 N HCl
(50 mL), stirred for 10 min, and then extracted with CH2Cl2 (4 ꢀ
50 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water,
dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. Purification by silica gel
chromatography (CH2Cl2) afforded 8 as a red powder (0.45 g,
16%): mp 217 °C; FTIR 1711, 1657; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz,
300 K) δ 8.54-8.52 (m, 1H), 8.21-8.19 (m, 1H), 8.18-8.16
(m, 1H), 7.84-7.82 (m, 1H), 7.69-7.65 (m, 1H), 7.58-7.52
(m, 2H), 7.19-7.16 (m, 1H), 7.07 (d, 1H, J=1.57 Hz), 7.05
(d, 1H, J = 8.21 Hz), 3.99 (s, 3H), 3.88 (s, 3H); 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 101 MHz) δ 195.4, 181.8, 150.4, 149.3, 147.8, 140.5,
136.0, 133.8, 131.4, 132.8, 131.8, 129.8, 129.6, 129.1, 129.0,
128.0, 126.6, 126.1, 123.6, 123.3, 112.9, 111.7, 56.3, 56.2; MS
m/z 368 (100). Anal. (C24H16O4, 368.1): calcd C, 78.25; H, 4.38;
found C, 78.25; H, 4.16. Purity (HPLC): 97.51%.
Method B. Anhydrous AlCl3 (0.40 g, 3 mmol) was added
in one portion to a suspension of 6 (0.23 g, 1 mmol) and
1,2-dimethoxybenzene (0.14 g, 1 mmol) in DCE (15 mL). After
the dark red solution stirred for 24 h at rt (TLC control,
CH2Cl2), the reaction mixture was poured into water (100 mL)/
6 N HCl (50 mL), stirred for 10 min, and then extracted with CH2Cl2
(4 ꢀ 50 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water,
dried (Na2SO4,) and concentrated. Purification by silica gel chro-
matography (CH2Cl2) afforded 8 as a red powder (97 mg, 26%).
1-(2,3,4-Trimethoxyphenyl)aceanthrylene-2,6-dione (9). Method
A. The title compound was prepared from 5 (2.14 g, 8.00 mmol),
1,2,3-trimethoxybenzene (4.03 g, 24.00 mmol), and AlCl3 (3.20 g,
24.00 mmol) in a similar manner as described for the prepara-
tion of 8 (method A). Purification by silica gel chromatography
(CH2Cl2) afforded 9 as a red powder (0.44 g, 14%): mp 193 °C;
FTIR 1711, 1658; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, 300 K) δ 8.54
(dd, 1H, J=8.02 Hz, J=1.17 Hz), 8.21 (dd, 1H, J=8.01 Hz, J=
0.78 Hz), 7.86-7.83 (m, 2H), 7.70-7.66 (m, 1H), 7.60-7.53
(m, 2H), 7.05 (d, 1H, J=8.60 Hz, 6.84 (d, 1H, J=8.59 Hz), 3.99
(s, 3H), 3.97 (s, 3H), 3.79 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz)
δ 195.3, 182.0, 155.3, 152.7, 147.8, 142.8, 142.1, 133.5, 133.0,
132.9, 131.7, 131.5, 129.8, 129.4, 129.3, 128.8, 128.4, 126.6,
126.1, 125.6, 118.1, 107.9, 61.7, 61.3, 56.4; MS m/z 398 (100).
Anal. (C25H18O5, 398.12): calcd C, 75.37; H, 4.55; found C,
75.30; H, 4.47. Purity (HPLC): 97.8%.
Experimental Section
(10-Oxo-10H-anthracen-9-ylidene) Acetyl Chloride (5).3
2,6-Aceanthrylenedione (6). Anhydrous AlCl3 (2.15 g, 16 mmol)
was added in one portion to a suspension of crude 5 (2.14 g, 8
mmol) in DCE (30 mL), and the solution was stirred at rt for 5 h.
Then, the reaction mixture was poured into a mixture of water
(150 mL)/6N HCl (50 mL), stirred for 10 min, and then extracted
with CH2Cl2 (4 ꢀ 50 mL). The combined organic layers were
washed with water, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. There-
after, the residue was purified by silica gel chromatography
(CH2Cl2) to afford 5 as an orange powder (0.79 g, 43%, not
1
optimized): mp 225 °C; FTIR 1704, 1657; H NMR (CDCl3,
400 MHz, 300 K) δ 8.51-8.50 (m, 1H), 8.14 (dd, 1H, J=8.22 Hz,
J=0.78 Hz), 8.06-8.04 (m, 1H), 7.81-7.73 (m, 3H), 7.61 (t, 1H,
J=7.43 Hz), 6.59 (s, 1H); 13CNMR (CDCl3, 101 MHz) δ 195.9,
181.8, 149.6, 147.1, 133.4, 132.9, 132.7, 130.7, 130.3, 130.1,
129.1, 129.0, 127.6, 126.6, 126.1,121.2; MS m/z 232 (100). Anal.
(C16H8O2, 232.05): calcd C, 82.75; H, 3.47; found C, 82.42;
H, 3.31.
1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)aceanthrylene-2,6-dione (7). Method A.
The title compound was prepared from 5 (2.14 g, 8.00 mmol)
and methoxybenzene (2.59 g, 24.00 mmol) in a similar manner as
described for the preparation of 8. Purification by silica gel
chromatography (CH2Cl2) afforded 7 as a red-orange powder
(0.38 g, 11%): mp 209 °C; FTIR 1708, 1661; 1H NMR (CDCl3,
400 MHz, 300 K) δ 8.46 (dd, 1H, J=7.83 Hz, J=1.56 Hz), 8.13
(dd, 1H, J = 7.83 Hz, J = 0.78 Hz), 8.09-8.08 (m, 1H), 7.76
(dd, 1H, J=7.04 Hz, J=0.78 Hz), 7.61-7.57 (m, 1H), 7.50-7.43
(m, 4H), 7.00 (d, 2H, J=9.0 Hz), 3.85 (s, 3H); 13CNMR (CDCl3,
101 MHz) δ 195.5, 181.8, 160.8, 147.8, 140.2, 135.9, 133.0, 132.8,
131.7, 131.66 (2 ꢀ C), 131.4, 129.7, 129.5, 129.05, 129.0, 127.8,
126.6, 126.0, 123.3, 114.6 (2 ꢀ C), 55.6; MS m/z 338 (100); high
resolution ESIMS (C23H14O3 þ Na): calcd 361.08406, found
361.08368.
Method B. The title compound was prepared from 6 (0.23 g,
1 mmol), 1,2,3-trimethoxybenzene (0.17 g, 1 mmol), and anhy-
drous AlCl3 (0.40 g, 3 mmol) in DCE (15 mL) in a similar
manner as described for the preparation of 8. Purification by
silica gel chromatography (CH2Cl2) afforded 9 as a red powder
(0.06 g, 15%): mp 192 °C.
Assay of Cell Growth. K562 cells were plated at 2 ꢀ 105 cells/
mL in 24-well dishes (Costar, Cambridge, MA). Untreated
control wells were assigned a value of 100%. Drugs were made
soluble in DMSO/methanol 1:1, and control wells received
equal volumes (0.5%) of vehicle alone. Drugs were dissolved
in methanol/DMSO 1:1. To each well was added 5 μL of drug,
and the final volume in the well was 500 μL. Cell numbers were
counted with a Neubauer counting chamber (improved, double
grid) after treatment with chemicals for 48 h. Each assay condi-
tion was prepared in triplicate, and the experiments were carried
out three times. IC50 values were obtained by nonlinear regres-
sion (GraphPad Prism) and represent the concentration at which
cell growth was inhibited by 50%. The adjusted cell number
was calculated as a percentage of the control, which was the
number of cells in wells without the addition of compound.
Method B. The title compound was prepared from 6 (0.23 g,
1 mmol), methoxybenzene (0.11 g, 1 mmol), and anhydrous
AlCl3 (0.40 g, 3 mmol) in DCE (15 mL) according to the pre-
paration of 8. Purification by silica gel chromatography
(CH2Cl2) afforded 7 as a red-orange powder (74 mg, 22%).
ꢀ
(9) Morais, S.; OMalley, S.; Chen, W.; Mulchandani, A. Anal. Biochem.
2003, 321, 44.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 11, 2010 3869