concerned, whereas in 1 the enabler/disabler input deactivates
both outputs (in this sense, a specific memory function of
D-latches is missed by 1). However the information linked
to the exchanging input of the molecular system is still
maintained, as removing the enabler/disabler input re-activates
the circuit and its specific output, conforming to the situation
determined by input-2. The enabler/disabler input in 1 can be
seen as a ‘‘hide’’ signal, as the output (and therefore, the
information embedded in the system by input-2) is temporarily
hidden, but it is stored and can be made visible again at will
when the enabler/disabler input is cancelled. In other words, 1
behaves as a concealable molecular switch, where one input
(the addition of Cu2+ ions) can disguise the state of the proton
switchable chromophore. In essence, 1 features the integration
of two logic gates: a NOR and an INHIBIT gate, with both
gates sharing the same inputs.
TLC was performed on silica gel plates coated with a
fluorescent indicator.
UV-Vis absorption spectra were recorded with a Jasco
560 spectrophotometer. Steady-state luminescence spectra
were recorded with a Horiba Jobin-Yvon Fluoromax P
spectrofluorimeter equipped with
a Hamamatsu R3896
photomultiplier, and were corrected for photomultiplier
response using a program purchased with the fluorimeter.
Emission lifetimes were measured with an Edinburgh
OB-900 single-photon counting spectrometer equipped with
a Hamamatsu PLP-2 laser diode (pulse width at 408 nm, 59 ps)
and/or with a PicoQuant PDL 800-D pulsed laser diode (pulse
width at 308 nm, 50 ps). The emission decay traces (emission
lifetimes measured at the emission maximum wavelengths)
were analyzed by the Marquadt algorithm. Experimental
uncertainty for absorption spectra maxima is 2 nm, for molar
absorption is 10%, for luminescence emission maxima is 4 nm,
for luminescence lifetime is 10%.
Finally, with reference to the connections between
molecular logics and complex biological systems as far as the
information processing is concerned, we would like to note
that the behavior of 1 could basically recall the way in which
some multifunctional enzymes (ME) work. An ME is an
enzyme which can perform different functions (outputs),
depending on changes of its environment (the ‘‘exchanging’’
input);14 however, when a suitable inhibitor (the ‘‘enabler/
disabler’’ input) is present, all the enzyme functions (or most
of them) can be suppressed.
Preparation and characterization of compound 1. In a round-
bottomed flask equipped with a Dean stark apparatus,
4-(bis((6-(pyridin-2-yl)pyridin-2-yl)methyl)amino)benzaldehyde
(85 mg, 0.185 mmol) and piperidine (2 mL) were added to a
stirred solution of bodipy (5.5 mg, 0.123 mmol) in toluene
(20 mL). The solution was heated at reflux for 12 h. After
cooling to rt, the mixture was washed with water and brine.
The organic phase was filtered over hydroscopic cotton wool
and rotary evaporated. The residue was purified by column
chromatography on silica gel eluting with a gradient of ethyl
acetate/petroleum ether (20/80 to 40/60) to give compound 1
(72 mg, 65%). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 300 MHz): d = 1.40 (s, 3H),
1.44 (s, 3H), 2.47 (s, 3H), 4.99 (s, 4H), 5.97 (s, 1H), 6.58 (s,
Conclusions
In short, we showed that 1 can exhibit a behavior which recalls
in part that of a D-type latch circuit, when protons and Cu2+
ions are used as the chemical inputs. The complete behavior of
a D-latch system (including the quite interesting memory
functions typical of D-latch systems) is not matched, however
a behavior allowing to include a hiding function on the output
of a stored information is obtained.15 Our results further
indicate that electronic logics can inspire the design of systems
towards alternative ways of processing the information at the
molecular level.
3
3
1H), 6.85 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H), 7.07 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.18
(d, 3J = 16.15 Hz, 1H), 7.27–7.31 (m, 5H), 7.41 (d, 3J =
8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.73–7.84 (m, 6H), 8.29 (d, 3J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 8.41
(d, 3J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 8.64 (d, 3J = 4.1 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H}
NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz): d = 14.2, 15.0, 46.3, 57.6, 78.6, 83.1,
112.9, 115.1, 118.0, 119.7, 120.8, 121.1, 121.4, 122.9, 123.9,
125.8, 128.7, 129.5, 132.8, 136.1, 137.1, 137.6, 137.9, 138.0,
141.0, 142.7, 149.3, 149.7, 153.7, 154.8, 156.2 ppm; ESI-MS:
m/z: 889.2 (100) [M]+; elemental analysis calcd for
This work is supported by MIUR (Prin 2008), the
University of Messina, and the Centre National de la
Recherche Scientifique (CNRS).
C48H39BF2IN7 (Mr
= 889.58): C, 64.81; H, 4.42; N,
11.02%. Found: C, 64.52; H, 3.98; N, 10.84%.
Notes and references
Experimental part
1 A. Aviram, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 5687.
2 A. P. de Silva, H. Q. N. Gunaratne and C. P. McCoy, Nature,
1993, 364, 42.
General methods
3 For few recent books or reviews, see: (a) Molecular Devices and
Machines-Concepts and Perspectives for the Nanoworld,
ed. V. Balzani, A. Credi and M. Venturi, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2008, ch. 9; (b) K. Szacilowski, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 3481;
(c) A. P. de Silva and S. Uchiyama, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2007, 2,
399; (d) U. Pischel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 4026.
4 A few papers are mentioned here: (a) M. Amelia, M. Baroncini and
A. Credi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 6240; (b) D. Gust,
T. A. Moore and A. L. Moore, Chem. Commun., 2006, 1169;
(c) J. Andreasson and U. Pischel, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 174;
(d) P. Ceroni, G. Bergamini and V. Balzani, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2009, 48, 8516; (e) F. M. Raymo and M. Tomasulo,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2006, 12, 3186; (f) D. Margulies, G. Melman and
A. Shanzer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 4865; (g) K. Rurack,
All reactions were performed under a dry atmosphere of argon
using standard Schlenk tube techniques. All chemicals were
used as received from commercial sources without further
purification unless otherwise stated. Toluene was distilled
from P2O5 under an argon atmosphere. The 200, 300, 400
(1H) and 50, 75, 100 MHz (13C) NMR spectra were recorded
at room temperature using perdeuterated solvents as internal
standards: % (H) in ppm relative to the residual protiated
solvent; % (C) in ppm relative to the solvent. Mass spectra
were measured with a ESI-MS mass spectrometer. Chromato-
graphic purifications were performed using 40–63 mm silica gel.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2011
New J. Chem., 2011, 35, 948–952 951