alcohol 14 which was readily transformed into the allylic
chloride 15 with good diastereocontrol (>8:1 C-12 E:Z) on
treatment with thionyl chloride (Scheme 3).27 After further
Scheme 2. Elaboration of the [3.3.0]-Bicyclic γ-Lactone 5
Scheme 3. Introduction of the C-11 Side Chain
bridgehead methyl group giving 12 with complete stereo-
control. The γ-lactone 12 was readily reduced to the
corresponding lactols 4, and methylenation of the lactols with
dimethyltitanocene17-19 gave the alcohol 3 with the C-10
quaternary stereocenter fully installed; the use of methylene
triphenylphosphorane or the Tebbe reagent20,21 was far less
efficient, resulting in protecting group loss or migration. The
primary alcohol in 3 was efficiently oxidized to the corre-
sponding aldehyde 13 with the Dess-Martin periodinane22,23
in readiness for introduction of the C-12 trisubstituted olefin.
The stereoselective formation of trisubstituted double
bonds is still a challenge in organic synthesis.24 We
investigated a large number of routes for the introduction of
the C-12 olefin including Wittig-type reactions on the
aldehyde 1325 and hydrometalation/cross-coupling reactions
on the methyl-substituted acetylene derived from the alde-
hyde 13; however, neither of these approaches proved
successful. The aldehyde 13 is sterically quite hindered, and
consequently, Wittig reactions were low yielding; addition-
ally, hydrometalation reactions of the acetylene derived from
the aldehyde 13 were complicated by the presence of the
C-26 terminal alkene.26 After considerable work, we found
that the use of a copper-catalyzed cross-coupling procedure
was effective. Thus, iso-propenylmagnesium bromide was
added to the aldehyde 13 in excellent yield to give the allylic
synthetic effort, we found that addition of a solution of the
allylic chloride and Kochi’s catalyst (Li2CuCl4)28,29 to a
solution of the commercially available racemic Grignard
reagent 16 in THF30 followed by treatment with TBAF
allowed isolation of the coupled product 17 as a single olefin
diastereomer in excellent yield.31
We were attracted to the use of organocopper methodology
for the synthesis of the trisubstituted C-5 olefin in the C-7
side chain (Scheme 4). Thus, the primary alcohol 17 was
readily oxidized to give the corresponsing aldehyde 1822,23
which was converted into the terminal acetylene 19 using
the Ohira-Bestmann reaction (89%).32,33 The terminal
acetylene 19 was converted into the corresponding substituted
methyl propiolate 20. Low temperature treatment of the
propiolate 20 with the Gilmann reagent, followed by a
methanol quench, gave the R,ꢀ-unsaturated ester 21 as a
single geometric isomer which was reduced to the allylic
alcohol 22 on exposure to DIBAL.34 The allylic alcohol 22
was converted into the natural product by initial chlorination
followed by treatment with iso-butylmagnesium chloride and
(17) Petasis, N. A.; Bzowej, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6392–
(27) (a) Young, W. G.; Caserio, F.; Brandon, D. Science 1953, 117,
473. (b) Caserio, F. F.; Dennis, G. E.; Dewolfe, R. H.; Young, W. G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 4182–4183. (c) Ireland, R. E.; Wrigley, T. I.; Young,
W. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 4604–4606. (d) Young, W. G.; Caserio,
F. F.; Brandon, D. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 6163–6168. (e) Pegolotti,
J.; Young, W. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 3251–3258. For recent
examples in natural product synthesis see: (f) Wender, P. A.; Jesudason,
C. D.; Nakahira, H.; Tamura, N.; Tebbe, A. L.; Ueno, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 12976–12977. (g) Smith, A. B.; Basu, K.; Bosanac, T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14872–14874. (h) Smith, A. B.; Bosanac, T.; Basu,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2348–2358. (i) Paquette, W. D.; Taylor,
R. E. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 103–106.
6394
.
(18) Petasis, N. A.; Lu, S. P.; Bzowej, E. I.; Fu, D. K.; Staszewski,
J. P.; AkritopoulouZanze, I.; Patane, M. A.; Hu, Y. H. Pure Appl. Chem.
1996, 68, 667–670
.
(19) Payack, J. F.; Huffman, M. A.; Cai, D. W.; Hughes, D. L.; Collins,
P. C.; Johnson, B. K.; Cottrell, I. F.; Tuma, L. D. Org. Process Res. DeV.
2004, 8, 256–259
.
(20) Tebbe, F. N.; Parshall, G. W.; Reddy, G. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1978, 100, 3611–3613
(21) Pine, S. H.; Zahler, R.; Evans, D. A.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1980, 102, 3270–3272
(22) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155–4156
(23) Meyer, S. D.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 7549–7552
.
.
.
(28) Tamura, M.; Kochi, J. Synthesis 1971, 303–305
.
.
(29) For a review on organocopper chemistry see: Lipshutz, B. H.;
(24) For a review on the Synthesis of highly substituted olefins see:
Flynn, A. B.; Ogilvie, W. W. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 4698–4745.
(25) For a recent example of difficulty encountered when using a Wittig
reaction to form a trisubstituted olefin see: Snyder, S. A.; Tang, Z.-Y.; Gupta,
R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5744–5745.
Sengupta, S. Org. React. 1992, 41, 135–631.
(30) This is the procedure described by Monte and Lindbeck: Monte,
W. T.; Lindbeck, A. C. Org. Process Res. DeV. 2001, 5, 267–269.
1
(31) The crude H NMR of the coupled product 2 did not indicate the
presence of any other alkene diastereomers.
(26) For a recent example of competitive hydrometallation of a terminal
olefin in the presence of an internal acetylene see: Semmelhack, M. F.;
Hooley, R. J.; Kraml, C. M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5203–5206.
(32) Ohira, S. Synth. Commun. 1989, 19, 561–564
(33) Muller, S.; Liepold, B.; Roth, G. J.; Bestmann, H. J. Synlett 1996,
521–522
.
.
2740
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 12, 2010