Scheme 1
Table 1. Zinc-Mediated Conjugate Addition of Alkynes to 1
acceptor
(R1)
compd
no.
alkyne
(R2)
time,
h
yield,
%
entry
1
2
3
4
5
6
Pr
1a
1b
1b
1b
1c
1d
Ph(CH2)2
Ph(CH2)2
Me3Si
Ph
Ph(CH2)2
Ph(CH2)2
2
2
1.5
3
2
88
89
86
85
87
90
â-alkynyl acids provided they were sufficiently electrophilic
toward an alkynylzinc (Scheme 1). They are accessed from
ephedrine and dimethylmalonate in useful yields.17 Conden-
sation of 3 with aldehydes is mediated by TiCl4 and
pyridine16c,18 and gives predominantly the (Z)-alkylidene
products (6-11:1, 72-97% yield);19 importantly, the minor
(E)-isomers can be conveniently removed by silica gel
chromatography. These acceptors 4 have been used in
asymmetric nickel-catalyzed conjugate additions of Grignard
reagents,16 hetero-Diels-Alder reactions,20 and trimethylen-
emethane cycloadditions.21 However, the use of alkynylmetal
nucleophiles was not examined in these studies.
We have found that the addition of zinc alkynylides to 4
proceeds to completion at 23 °C in CH2Cl2. Optimal results
were obtained by using 60 mol % of Zn(OTf)2 furnishing
the adducts 5a-e in 63-95% yield in 18 h as a mixture of
diastereomers, because the CR stereocenter produced upon
protonation of the enolate is formed nonselectively. The
selectivity at Câ was assayed by converting the adducts into
the corresponding â-alkynyl acids 6a-e and analyzing their
ee (Table 2). Thus, alkaline hydrolysis of 5a-e with KOH
in refluxing 1-propanol led to intermediate diacids, which
were decarboxylated in DMSO at 100 °C (Table 2) furnishing
6a-e in 84-92% yield over two steps.
We found that the addition is highly diastereoselective for
acceptors with branched substituents (95f98% ee, Table 2).
The adduct is formed with lower stereocontrol (82% ee) for
an acceptor bearing an unbranched alkyl chain. Additions
to acceptors with aromatic or unsaturated residues were not
observed to proceed. The high selectivities at room temper-
ature are noteworthy, as alkyl Grignard additions previously
reported were selective only at -78 °C with these acceptors.16c
The loading of Zn(II) could be lowered to 20 mol %, when
the reaction was conducted at 60 °C in toluene,11b although
the selectivities and isolated yields were somewhat lower
(Table 2). The stereoselectivity of addition is consistent with
iPr
iPr
iPr
tBu
Ph
1
the alkynylzinc reagents produced (RCtCsZnOTf)12 are
distinct from those that have been previously examined,
derived from transmetalation (RCtCsLi + ZnCl2) or
metalation (RCtCsH + Me2Zn or Et2Zn), we have been
interested in exploring their reactivity in a host of different
processes.
In initial investigations with the alkynylzinc reagent
derived from 4-phenyl-1-butyne and Zn(OTf)2/Et3N, we
observed that doubly activated Michael acceptors were
required for conjugate addition. In this respect, Meldrum’s
acid derived acceptors 14,13,14 (Table 1) are useful, since they
can be easily prepared by simply heating Meldrum’s acid
and aldehydes in water15 and, furthermore, the product of
conjugate addition can be easily hydrolyzed and decarboxy-
lated to yield the corresponding â-alkynyl acids by heating
in wet DMF.4
Under optimized conditions, the in situ generated zinc
alkynylides add to 1a-d to form adducts 2a-f in acetonitrile
at 60 °C in 1.5-3 h. The method allows addition of alkyl-,
aryl-, and silyl-alkynylides to acceptors substituted with
propyl, isopropyl, tert-butyl, and phenyl groups in 85-90%
isolated yield (Table 1). This unprecedented process with
Zn(II) is notable because of its ease of execution with short
reaction times.
We next decided to investigate chiral Michael acceptors
with Zn-alkynylides. We speculated that the optically active
oxazepanedione acceptors developed by Mukaiyama16 would
be useful reaction partners leading to optically active
(11) (a) Frantz, D. E.; Fa¨ssler, R.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 1806-1807. (b) Anand, N. K.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 9687-9688. (c) El-Sayed, E.; Anand, N. K.; Carreira, E.
M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3017-3020. (d) Sasaki, H.; Boyall, D.; Carreira, E.
M. HelV. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 964-971. (e) Boyall, D.; Frantz, D. E.;
Carreira, E. M. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2605-2606. (f) Reber, S.; Kno¨pfel, T.
F.; Carreira, E. M. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 6813-6817.
(12) Fa¨ssler, R.; Tomooka, C. S.; Frantz, D. E.; Carreira, E. M. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 5843-5845.
(13) For enantioselective Et2Zn additions to Meldrum’s acid derived
acceptors see: Watanabe, T.; Kno¨pfel, T. F.; Carreira, E. M. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 4557-4558.
(16) (a) Mukaiyama, T.; Takeda, T.; Osaki, M. Chem. Lett. 1977, 1165-
1168. (b) Mukaiyama, T.; Hirako, Y.; Takeda, T. Chem. Lett. 1978, 461-
464. (c) Mukaiyama, T.; Takeda, T.; Fujimoto, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
1978, 51, 3368-3372.
(17) For details see the Supporting Information.
(18) Lehnert, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1970, 11, 4723-4724.
(19) Proved by the X-ray structure of 4d (R3 ) tBu), see Supporting
Information. The stereochemistry was initially missassigned (ref 15), but
later corrected (refs 19 and 20).
(20) (a) Tietze, L. F.; Brand, S.; Pfeiffer, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1985, 24, 784-786. (b) Tietze, L. F.; Brand, S.; Pfeiffer, T.; Antel, J.;
Harms, K.; Sheldrick, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 921-923.
(21) Trost, B. M.; Yang, B. W.; Miller, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989,
111, 6482-6484.
(14) Kruse, L. I.; Kaiser, W. E. D.; Chambers, P. A.; Goodhart, P. J.;
Ezekiel, M.; Ohlstein. J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 704-706.
(15) Bigi, F.; Carloni, S.; Ferrari, L.; Maggi, R.; Mazzacani, A.; Sartori,
G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5203-5205.
2282
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 13, 2004