New Deep Blue Emitting Materials Based on Indenopyrazine Core with High Thermal Stability
Seok et al.
and compared, and the synthesized materials were used as
emitting layer in non-doped OLED devices.
organic extract was dried with MgSO4 added, and then
filtered the solvent removed in vacuo. The resulting crude
mixture was passed through a short-column of silica with
THF as the eluent and then recrystallized from THF to
obtain DPP-EPY as a white solid.
2. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
2.1. General Method
2.3. Synthesis of
1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker,
Advance 500 and Fast atom bombardment (FAB) mass
spectra were recorded by JEOL, JMS-AX505WA, HP5890
series II. The optical absorption spectra were obtained by
HP 8453 UV-VIS-NIR spectrometer. Perkin Elmer lumi-
nescence spectrometer LS50 (Xenon flash tube) was used
for photo- and electro-luminescence spectroscopy. The
melting temperatures (Tmꢂ, glass-transition temperatures
(Tg), crystallization temperatures (Tc), and degradation
temperatures (Tdꢂ of the compounds were measured by
carrying out differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) under
a nitrogen atmosphere using a DSC2910 (TA Instruments)
and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) using a SDP-
TGA2960 (TA Instruments). OELD devices were fabri-
cated as the following structure: ITO/NPB (30 nm)/TCTA
(20 nm)/synthesized materials (30 nm)/Alq3 (30 nm)/LiF
(1 nm)/Al (200 nm), where NꢁNꢀ-bis(naphthalen-
1-yl)-NꢁNꢀ-bis(phenyl)benzidine (NPB), 4,4ꢀ,4ꢀꢀ-tri(N-
carbazolyl)triphenylamine (TCTA) as hole transporting
layer, 8-hydroxyquinoline aluminum (Alq ꢂ as electron
transporting layer, the synthesized materials as emitting
layers, lithium fluoride (LiF) as electron injection layer,
ITO as anode and Al as cathode. The organic layer was
vacuum-deposited using thermal evaporation at a vacuum
base pressure of 10−6 torr and the rate of deposition being
1 Å/s to give an emitting area of 4 mm2, and the Al
layer was continuously deposited under the same vac-
uum condition. The current–voltage (I–V ) characteristics
of the fabricated EL devices were obtained by Keithley
2400 electrometer. Light intensity was obtained by Minolta
CS-1000.
2,8-Bis(3,5-diphenylphenyl)-6,6,12,12-Tetraethyl-
6,12-Dihydrodiindeno[1,2-b:1ꢀ,2ꢀ-e]Pyrazine
(DPP-EPY)
1
The final yield was 90%. H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3ꢂ:
ꢃ (ppm): 8.21 (d, 2H). 7.88 (s, 4H), 7.81 (m, 4H), 7.75
(m, 10H), 7.42 (t, 4H), 2.41 (m, 4H), 2.17 (m, 4H), 0.43
(t, 12H), 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3ꢂ: 163.2, 152.2,
150.5, 142.8, 142.6, 142.3, 141.4, 138.9, 129.1, 127.8,
127.6, 127.0, 125.5, 122.0, 121.7, 54.3, 31.5, 9.0, FT-IR
(KBr cm−1ꢂ: 3056, 2960, 2929, 2875, 1594, 1496, 1455,
1371, 1288, 1221, 1178, 1124, 1029, 873, 840, 700, Fab+-
MS m/e: 825.
2.4. Synthesis of 2,8-Bis(3ꢀ,5ꢀ-diphenylbiphenyl-
4-yl)-6,6,12,12-Tetraethyl-6,12-
Dihydrodiindeno[1,2-b:1ꢀ,2ꢀ-e]Pyrazine
(DPBP-EPY)
1
The final yield was 42%. H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3)
Delivered by I3ngenta to: Chinese University of Hong Kong
ꢃ (ppm): 8.20 (d, 1H), 7.86 (t, 7H), 7.78 (d, 1H), 7.74
IP: 5.189.201.151 On: Tue, 10 May 2016 10:44:10
(d, 5H), 7.51 (t, 4H), 7.41 (t, 2H), 2.42 (m, 2H), 2.17
Copyright: American Scientific Publishers
(m, 2H), 0.46 (t, 6H), 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3ꢂ: 163.2,
150.5, 142.7, 142.0, 141.8, 141.3, 140.7, 140.5, 138.8,
129.1, 128.0, 127.9, 127.8, 127.6, 126.7, 125.2, 121.8,
121.7, 54.3, 31.5, 8.9, FT-IR (KBr cm−1ꢂ: 3062, 2960,
2921, 2875, 1594, 1517, 1498, 1455, 1413, 1367, 1309,
1261, 1226, 1176, 1122, 1078, 1027, 919, 881, 831, 705,
Fab+-MS m/e: 976.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Synthetic processes of DPP-EPY and DPBP-EPY are sum-
marized in Scheme 1. Four ethyl groups were intro-
duced in positions 6 and 12 of indenopyrazine core
through tetraalkylation of dibromoindenopyrazine to form
dibromo-tetraethylindenopyazine (EPY). And then, DPP-
EPY and DPBP-EPY were synthesized through Suzuki
Ar–Ar coupling reaction of borated m-terphenyl or triph-
enylbenzene with EPY dibrominated at positions 2 and 8.
Synthesized materials were refined with silica gel column
2.2. General Synthesis of New Emitters
These emitters were synthesized by Suzuki aryl–aryl
coupling reaction using Pd catalyst. A typical syn-
thetic procedure was as follows: To 2,8-dibromo-
6,6,12,12-tetraethyl-6,12-dihydro-diindeno [1, 2-b;1ꢀ, 2ꢀ-e]
pyrazine (1 g, 1.9 mmol) and 4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-2-
[1,1ꢀ;3ꢀ,1ꢀꢀ]terphenyl-5ꢀ-yl-[1,3,2]dioxaborolane (1.49 g,
4.19 mmol) in
a 500 mL round-bottomed flask
1
under a nitrogen atmosphere were added Pd(OAC)2
(0.042 g, 0.19 mmol), tri-cyclohexyl-phosphine (0.053 g,
0.19 mmol) and toluene. The temperature was increased
chromatography and the structure was verified with H-
NMR, 13C-NMR, FT-IR and Fab+-mass. Optical proper-
ties of these two materials in the solution state and thin-
film state were summarized in Figure 1 and Table I. As
shown in Figure 1(a), synthesized materials in solution
state showed UV maximum wavelengths of 404 nm and
409 nm, respectively for DPP-EPY and DPBP-EPY. DPP-
EPY was blue-shifted slightly because conjugation length
ꢁ
to 50 C, and tetraethylammonium hydroxide (13.5 mL,
19.0 mmol, 20 wt% in water) was added. Stirring was con-
tinued at this temperature and the reaction was monitored
by TLC. When the reaction was complete, extraction of
the product was performed with water and toluene. The
4640
J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 11, 4639–4643, 2011