to handle and are built only from common second-row
elements. Although 1 and 2 are readily made, their carbene
precursors (an imidazolium or triazolium salt) are rather
expensive. The reagents are not ideally efficient in xanthate
reductions (often 2 equiv are used to maximize yield), and the
more well-studied reagent 1 has a relatively high molecular
weight of 402 g mol-1. Compare this to tributyltin hydride at
291 g mol-1 or tris(trimethylsilyl)silane at 249 g mol-1.
Herein we report that “minimalist” NHC-boranes 3 (110
g mol-1) and 4 (111 g mol-1) prepared from simple, readily
available imidazolium or triazolium salts are superior to first-
in-class reagents 1 and 2 in reductions of xanthates and
related functional groups.
characterized by the usual means (including 11B NMR
spectroscopy)10 and were stable to prolonged storage under
standard ambient conditions.
Imidazol-2-ylideneborane (1) is the most well understood
NHC-borane reagent to date, so we chose this as a
benchmark. In kinetic experiments described in the previous
paper,11 the rate constant for hydrogen abstraction from 3
by a primary alkyl radical was found to be kH ) 8 × 104
M-1 s-1 (See Figure 2). The measured rate constant for 4
1,3-Dimethylimidazol-2-ylideneborane (3) (hereafter called
diMe-Imd-BH3) was readily prepared by deprotonation of
1,3-dimethylimidazolium iodide (5) with NaHMDS followed
by addition of borane in THF (Scheme 1).5c Isolation by
Figure 2. Comparison of rate constants for generation and
termination of NHC-boryl radicals 1• and 3•. (The rate constants
kH and 2kT were measured in different experiments.)
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1,3-Dimethylimidazol-2-ylideneborane
(3, diMe-Imd-BH3) and 2,4-Dimethyltriazol-3-ylideneborane (4,
diMe-Tri-BH3)
was comparable to 3. Contrast this to 1, which is about 4
times less reactive.5a
Like 1•, the NHC-boryl radical 3• generated by hydrogen
abstraction from 3 by t-BuO• was detected by EPR
spectroscopy.5c Boryl radical 3• reacted with itself (presum-
ably by dimerization) at rates approaching the diffusion
controlled limit (2kT > 1010 M-1 s-1). In contrast, boryl
radical 1• was persistent (2kT ) 9 × 106 M-1 s-1). Both of
these results can be understood by steric effects; the radical
3• is easier to generate and reacts more rapidly than 1•.
Based on these kinetic results, we undertook a series of
preparative experiments to evaluate the potential of 3 and 4
as radical reducing agents in more detail. The results of an
initial set of comparison experiments of diMe-Imd-BH3 (3)
with current standard 1 in the reduction of xanthate,
phenylthionocarbonate, and imidazolyl derivatives of several
secondary alcohols are summarized in Table 1.
In a typical pair of experiments under thermal conditions
(A), a benzene solution of xanthate 7a, NHC-borane 1 or 3
(1 equiv), and AIBN (1 equiv) was heated at reflux for 2 h.
The solvent was evaporated, and the crude product was
purified by flash chromatography to provide the isolated yield
of 10. In the reaction with 3, the xanthate was consumed,
and the reduced product 10 was isolated in 77% yield (entry
1). In contrast, the reaction with 1 provided only 15% yield
of 10 along with 73% of recovered xanthate 7a (entry 2).
Similar results were obtained in reductions of xanthates 8a
(78% of 11 compared 8%; entries 3 and 4) and 9a (88% of
12 compared to 42%; entries 9 and 10). In the reduction of
8a with 1, the major component was again recovered starting
material (64%). The yields with 1 are significantly lower
than previously reported because the reaction conditions are
flash chromatography was convenient on 1 g scale, and 3
was obtained in 79% yield as a white solid, mp 134-137
°C. A similar reaction of 2,4-dimethyl-1,2,4-triazolium iodide
(6) provided 2,4-dimethyl-1,2,4-triazol-3-ylideneborane (4)
(hereafter called diMe-Tri-BH3) in 61% yield after flash
chromatography, mp 57-58 °C. Both compounds were fully
(5) (a) Ueng, S.-H.; Solovyev, A.; Yuan, X.; Geib, S. J.; Fensterbank,
L.; Lacoˆte, E.; Malacria, M.; Newcomb, M.; Walton, J. C.; Curran, D. P.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11256–11262. (b) Matsumoto, T.; Gabba¨ı,
F. P. Organometallics 2009, 28, 4252–4253. (c) Walton, J. C.; Makhlouf
Brahmi, M.; Fensterbank, L.; Lacoˆte, E.; Malacria, M.; Chu, Q.; Ueng,
S.-H.; Solovyev, A.; Curran, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 2350–
2358. (d) Tehfe, M.-A.; Makhlouf Brahmi, M.; Fouassier, J.-P.; Curran,
D. P.; Malacria, M.; Fensterbank, L.; Lacoˆte, E.; Laleve´e, J. Macromolecules
2010, 43, 2261–2267.
(6) For pioneering work on amine and phosphine boryl radicals, see:
(a) Dang, H.-S.; Roberts, B. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6169–6172. (b)
Dang, H.-S.; Diart, V.; Roberts, B. P.; Tocher, D. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 1994, 1039–1045. (c) Roberts, B. P.; Steel, A. J. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 2411–2422. (d) Barton, D. H. R.; Jacob, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1331–1334. (e) Lucarini, M.; Pedulli, G. F.;
Valgimigli, L. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1161–1164. (f) Baban, J. A.; Roberts,
B. P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1988, 1195–1200. (g) Sheeller, B.;
Ingold, K. U. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 480–486. (h) Laleve´e,
J.; Tehfe, M. A.; Allonas, X.; Fouassier, J. P. Macromolecules 2008, 41,
9057–9062.
(7) These transformations are members of a larger class called
Barton-McCombie reactions: Crich, D.; Quintero, L. Chem. ReV. 1989,
89, 1413–1432.
(8) (a) Chu, Q.; Makhlouf Brahmi, M.; Solovyev, A.; Ueng, S.-H.;
Curran, D. P.; Malacria, M.; Fensterbank, L.; Lacoˆte, E. Chem.sEur. J.
2009, 15, 12937–12940. (b) Lindsay, D. M.; McArthur, D. Chem. Commun.
2010, 46, 2474–2476.
(10) The preparation and characterization of 3 are described in the
Supporting Information of ref 5c, while the corresponding information for
4 is in the Supporting Information of this paper.
(11) Solovyev, A.; Ueng, S.-H.; Monot, J.; Malacria, M.; Fensterbank,
L.; Lacoˆte, E.; Curran, D. P. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, DOI: 10.1021/ol101014q.
(9) Monot, J.; Makhlouf Brahmi, M. M.; Ueng, S.-H.; Robert, C.; Murr,
M. D.-E.; Curran, D. P.; Malacria, M.; Fensterbank, L.; Lacoˆte, E. Org.
Lett. 2009, 11, 4914–4917.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 13, 2010
3003