A. Bridoux et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 3394–3398
3397
fect on new blood vessel formation, but the effect was not compa-
rable to the reference compounds. The extent of angiogenesis in-
duced by compounds in which the NH2 group was protected
with small moieties such as Me (methyl) (10), or Et (ethyl) (11)
was similar (105 and 136 branch points, respectively) to that of
free T4 (137 branch points) and FGF (130 branch points) (Fig. 3
and Table 2). Similar activity was observed for analogs 8 and 9.
Conversely, disubstituted compounds with highly lipophilic groups
(12, 13, and 15) were less effective than the control. In fact, com-
pound 12 inhibited the effect of FGF. Compound 14, in which T4
was disubstituted with a hydrogen bond acceptor at the COOH
end, stimulated angiogenesis to a lesser extent than T4. Synthe-
sized analogs 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 were also tested for
their ability to stimulate angiogenesis, as measured by the produc-
tion of hemoglobin (Hb), in the matrigel assay. T4 significantly in-
duced angiogenesis (Table 3). T4 analogs 8, 9, and 10 also induced
angiogenesis at levels comparable to T4 (62, 95, and 87%, respec-
tively). T4 analog 11 induced angiogenesis to a lesser extent
(45%). There was no apparent stimulation of angiogenesis by ana-
logs 12, 13, 14, and 15. T4 analog 12 appeared to inhibit T4-induced
angiogenesis (Table 4).
The results of the CAM and matrigel assays (Tables 2–4) indi-
cated that the greater the extent of hindrance of the NH2 group,
the greater the inhibition of T4 pro-angiogenic activity. That is,
all mono-acylated and mono-alkylated analogs demonstrated
clearly diminished stimulation. A second substitution on the PhOH
end (9) did not significantly reduce the potency of the drug, which
suggested that this part of the molecule did not participate in bind-
ing. A second substitution at the COOH end, on the other hand, pre-
vented stimulation completely. One analog, compound 12, had the
surprising effect of entirely inhibiting FGF and T4 activity. Com-
pared to analog 11, the presence of an Et group at the acid end
of 12 appeared to disable the molecule in terms of stimulating
the production of new blood vessels and antagonized the effects
of T4 to the same extent as tetrac ([4-(4-hydroxy-3,5-diiodophen-
oxy)-3,5-diiodophenyl]acetic acid) (Table 4).
activity. A useful compound has been validated as a precursor for
a water-soluble nanoparticle formulation of the hormone. The
results suggested the OH of the PhOH group as the best site for
condensation with a nanoparticle.
Acknowledgments
We thank the staffs at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute NMR
facility, University at Albany Proteomics Facility, and Center for
Functional Genomics Mass Spectrometry facility. We also thank
Ms. Susan Shipherd for reviewing this publication and Dr. Huaz-
dong He for helpful comments on the manuscript, Dr. Mary Rose
Burnham and Mr. Jason Fishel for editorial assistance, Dr. Christine
Bianchini, and Dr. Jay Jayaraman for his help and constant support.
This work was funded in part by the Charitable Leadership Founda-
tion, Medical Technology Acceleration Program and the Pharma-
ceutical Research Institute.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (synthesis and analytical characterization
of all compounds) associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Mousa, S. A. Mol. Biotechnol. 2008, 38, 33.
2. Mousa, S. A.; Davis F. B.; Davis P. J. Int. Patent WO/2008/051291, 2008.
3. Mousa, S. A.; Davis, F. B.; Mohamed, S.; Davis, P. J.; Feng, X. Int. Angiol. 2006, 25,
407.
4. Mousa, S. A.; O’Connor, L. J.; Bergh, J. J.; Davis, F. B.; Scanlan, T. S.; Davis, P. J. J.
Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2005, 46, 356.
5. Mousa, S. A.; Davis, F. B.; Davis, P. J. Immun., Endocr. & Metab. Agents Med. Chem.
2009, 9, 1.
6. Nilsson, S. F.; Peterson, P. A. J. Biol. Chem. 1971, 246, 6098.
7. Shakweh, M.; Besnard, M.; Nicolas, V.; Fattal, E. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2005,
21, 1.
8. Nakajima, N.; Ikada, Y. Bioconjugate Chem. 1995, 6, 123.
9. Xiong, J.-P.; Stehle, T.; Diefenbach, B.; Zhang, R.; Dunker, R.; Scott, D. L.;
Joachimiak, A.; Goodman, S. L.; Arnaout, M. A. Science 2001, 294, 339.
10. Xiong, J. P.; Stehle, T.; Zhang, R.; Joachimiak, A.; Frech, M.; Goodman, S. L.;
Arnaout, M. A. Science 2002, 296, 151.
In summary, synthetic modifications of thyroid hormone led to a
significantly improved understanding of the functional importance
of the COOH and NH2 groups of the molecule for pro-angiogenic
11. Docking of 7 and tetrac to avb3 was performed using Autodock version 2.4. This
program allows flexibility in the ligand structure but uses a rigid body protein
approximation in order to speed up the calculation. The 1L5G.pdb file for the
protein used for docking was taken from the Brookhaven database. Partial
charges for protein atoms were taken from the AutoDock version of the AMBER
force field5. For the model ligands, flexibility was allowed for all torsion angles.
Partial atomic charges required for the docking calculation were obtained by
ab initio quantum chemistry calculations using the HyperChemÒ program
(HyperCube). Grids of probe atom interaction energies were computed first;
84 Å side grids with a spacing of 0.7 Å were used for all the modules. The ligand
probes were then docked by simulated annealing. Typically, the 50 lowest
energy coordinate sets were extracted for each ligand type and used for
visualization in the software WebLab Viewer (Molecular Simulation, Inc).
12. Weiner, S. J.; Kollman, P. A.; Nguyen, D. T.; Case, D. A. J. Comput. Chem. 1986, 7,
230.
13. Weiner, S. J.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A.; Singh, U. C.; Ghio, C.; Alagona, G.;
Profeta, S., Jr.; Weiner, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 765.
14. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Huey, R.; Olson, A. J. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des.
1996, 10, 293.
15. Bridoux, A.; Cui, H.; Dyskin, E.; Yalcin, M.; Mousa, S. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2009, 19, 3259.
Table 3
Pro-angiogenic effects of T4 analogs on angiogenesis in the mouse matrigel model
Hemoglobin (mg/mL) SEMa
Mean stimulation of
angiogenesisb (%)
Control 0.3 0.1
T4
8
—
0.9 0.2
0.7 0.2
0.9 0.2
0.8 0.2
0.6 0.2
0.3 0.1
0.3 0.1
0.3 0.1
100 22
62 38
95 33
87 33
45 33
9
10
11
13
14
15
0
0
0
17
17
17
a
Data represents the means SEM (n = 6–7).
All thyroid analogs were tested at a concentration of 10 lg/matrigel plug.
b
16. Brook, M.; Chan, T. Synthesis 1983, 3, 201.
17. Lambert, J. B.; Kania, L.; Zhang, S. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 1191.
18. Reed, C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 325.
Table 4
Anti-angiogenic effects of T4 analog 12 on angiogenesis in the mouse matrigel model
19. To assess angiogenesis in the CAM model system, 10 day-old fertilized chicken
eggs (Sunrise Farms, Inc, Catskill, NY) were incubated at 37 °C in 55% relative
humidity. In the dark, with the help of a candling lamp, a small hole was
punctured in the area of the shell covering the air sac using a hypodermic
needle. A second hole was punctured on the wider side of the egg above an
avascular area of the embryonic membrane. An artificial air sac was created
below the second hole by gently applying a vacuum to the first hole using a
small rubber squeeze bulb. An approximately 1.0 cm2 window was cut in the
shell over the dropped CAM with the use of a mini drill. Filter disks (filter paper
#1, Whatman International, Ltd, United Kingdom) were soaked in 3 mg/mL
cortisone acetate solution (in 95% ethanol) and then air-dried under sterile
conditions. Sterile filter disks were saturated with L-T4 or FGF; control disks
Hemoglobin (mg/mL) SEMa
Mean inhibition of
angiogenesisb (%)
Control
T4
0.3 0.1
1.2 0.4
—
—
T4 + Tetrac 0.4 0.1
T4 + 12 0.4 0.1
89 11
89 11
a
Data represents the means SEM (n = 25).
T4, 12, and tetrac were tested at a concentration of 10 lg/matrigel plug.
b