1982
H.V. Huynh, Y.X. Chew / Inorganica Chimica Acta 363 (2010) 1979–1983
Table 2
itate was formed. The reaction mixture was filtered through a sin-
tered funnel and the white precipitate was washed with toluene.
The product was dried in vacuo to afford an off-white powder
(1.522 g, 4.92 mmol, 78%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 11.43 (s,
1H, NCHN), 7.77–7.75 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.70–7.61 (m, 3H, Ar-H),
7.51 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.31 (dd, 3J(H,H) = 5.1 Hz, 4J(H,H) = 1.2 Hz, 1H,
Ar-H), 7.03–7.00 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 6.10 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.26 (s, 3H,
NCH3). 13C{1H} NMR (75.47 MHz, CDCl3): d 142.9 (s, NCHN),
134.2, 132.0, 130.8, 129.9, 127.7, 127.3, 127.3, 113.5, 112.9 (s,
Ar-C), 45.8 (s, CH2), 33.9 (s, NCH3). MS (ESI): m/z = 229 [MꢀBr]+.
Anal. Calc. for C13H13BrN2S (M = 309.22): C, 50.49; H, 4.24; N,
9.06. Found: C, 50.23; H, 4.51; N, 8.90%.
Selected crystallographic data for salt 2 and complex cis–anti-3.
2 ꢁ 1.5H2O
cis–anti-
3 ꢁ 1.5CH3COCH3
C26H24Br2N4PdS2
1.5CH3COCH3
809.95
Empirical formula
C13H13BrN2S ꢁ 1.5H2O
ꢁ
Formula weight
Color, habit
Crystal size (mm)
Crystal system
Space group
a (Å)
336.25
colorless, block
0.40 ꢃ 0.16 ꢃ 0.08
monoclinic
P21/c
17.1632(14)
7.3363(6)
22.9362(17)
90
colorless, needle
0.18 ꢃ 0.04 ꢃ 0.04
monoclinic
C2/c
18.4228(13)
17.1467(14)
11.6450(7)
90
b (Å)
c (Å)
a
(°)
b (°)
90.368(2)
90
2887.9(4)
8
1.547
2.986
1.19–27.50
12165
0.7961, 0.3813
102.643(2)
90
3589.3(4)
4
1.499
2.889
1.64–25.00
10375
0.8932, 0.6244
4.4. Synthesis of palladium complex cis-3
c
(°)
V (Å3)
A mixture of salt 2 (0.343 g, 1.11 mmol) and Pd(OAc)2 (0.120 g,
0.53 mmol) was dissolved in DMSO (12 mL) and stirred overnight
at 90 °C. The yellow solution first turned green after a few hours
and darkened after reacting overnight. The reaction mixture was
filtered through a sintered funnel and the solvent of the filtrate
was removed by vacuum distillation. The resulting residue was
dissolved in CH2Cl2 (30 mL) and extracted with H2O (5 ꢃ 20 mL).
The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent was re-
moved in vacuo. The solid obtained was washed with diethyl ether
and THF. Removal of the solvent in vacuo yielded a light brown
powder (0.191 g, 0.26 mmol, 50%). Slow evaporation of a concen-
trated acetone solution afforded the cis–anti complex as crystals.
Cis–anti-3: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2): d 7.20–7.12 (m, 4H, Ar-H),
7.05–7.00 (m, 1H, Ar-H) 6.70–6.66 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 4.16 (s, 3H,
NCH3). 13C{1H} NMR (125.77 MHz, CD2Cl2): d 174.2 (s, NCN),
137.0, 135.7, 133.8, 127.3, 126.2, 125.7, 124.1, 124.0, 111.5, 110.9
(s, Ar-C), 48.6 (s, NCH2), 36.1 (s, NCH3). Cis–syn-3: 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CD2Cl2): d 7.40–7.22 (m, 5H, Ar-H), 6.82–6.75 (m, 2H,
Ar-H), 4.32 (s, 3H, NCH3). 13C{1H} NMR (125.77 MHz, CD2Cl2): d
174.4 (s, NCN), 136.9, 135.5, 133.9, 127.2, 126.1, 125.7, 124.1,
123.9, 112.0, 110.7 (s, Ar-C), 48.8 (s, NCH2), 36.2 (s, NCH3). MS
(ESI): m/z = 643 [MꢀBr]+. Anal. Calc. for C26H24Br2N4PdS2ꢁ-
CH3COCH3 (M = 780.93): C, 44.60; H, 3.87; N, 7.17. Found: C,
44.46; H, 4.07; N, 6.89%.
Z
Dcalcd (g cmꢀ3
)
l
(mmꢀ1
)
h range (°)
No. of unique data
Maximum, minimum
transmition
Final R indices [I > 2
r
(I)]
R1 = 0.0485,
wR2 = 0.1242
R1 = 0.0737,
wR2 = 0.1368
1.030
R1 = 0.0637,
wR2 = 0.1521
R1 = 0.0987,
wR2 = 0.1693
1.046
R indices (all data)
Goodness-of-fit (GOF) on F2
Peak/hole (e Åꢀ3
)
0.728/ꢀ0.542
0.723/ꢀ0.599
non-hydrogen atoms were generally given anisotropic displace-
ment parameters in the final model. A summary of the most impor-
tant crystallographic data is given in Table 2.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the National University of Sin-
gapore for financial support (Grant No. R 143-000-327-133) and
especially Ms. Geok Kheng Tan, Ms. Su Fen Woo and Prof. Lip Lin
Koh for determining the X-ray molecular structures.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
4.5. General procedure for the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling
CCDC 716610 and 716611 contain the supplementary crystallo-
graphic data for 2 ꢁ 1.5H2O and cis–anti-3 ꢁ 1.5CH3COCH3. These
data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallo-
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
In a typical run, a test tube was charged with a mixture of aryl
halide (1.0 mmol), phenylboronic acid (1.2 mmol), potassium car-
bonate (2 mmol), precatalyst cis-3 (0.01 mmol) and [N(n-
C4H9)4]Br (1.5 mmol) (for entries 3–6 in the Table 1). To the mix-
ture was added H2O (3 mL). The reaction mixture was vigorously
stirred at the appropriate temperature (RT or 85 °C). After the de-
sired reaction time, the solution was allowed to cool. 10 ml of
dichloromethane was added to the reaction mixture and the organ-
ic phase was extracted with water (6 ꢃ 5 mL) and dried over
MgSO4. The solvent was removed by evaporation to give a crude
product, which was analyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
References
[1] F.E. Hahn, M.C. Jahnke, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 47 (2008) 3122.
[2] A.T. Normand, K.J. Cavell, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2008) 2781.
[3] D. Sellmann, W. Prechtel, F. Knoch, M. Moll, Organometallics 11 (1992) 2346.
[4] D. Sellmann, W. Prechtel, F. Knoch, M. Moll, Inorg. Chem. 32 (1993) 538.
[5] D. Sellmann, C. Allmann, F. Heinemann, F. Knoch, J. Sutter, J. Organomet. Chem.
541 (1997) 291.
[6] J.A. Cabeza, I. del Rio, M.G. Sánchez-Vega, M. Suárez, Organometallics 25
(2006) 1831.
4.6. X-ray diffraction studies
[7] H. Seo, H.-J. Park, B.Y. Kim, J.H. Lee, S.U. Son, Y.K. Chung, Organometallics 22
(2003) 618.
[8] J. Wolf, A. Labande, J.-C. Daran, R. Poli, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2007) 5069.
[9] S.J. Roseblade, A. Ros, D. Monge, M. Alcarazo, E. Álvarez, J.M. Lassaletta, R.
Fernández, Organometallics 26 (2007) 2570.
[10] H.V. Huynh, C.H. Yeo, G.K. Tan, Chem. Commun. (2006) 3833.
[11] D.J. Nielsen, K.J. Cavell, M.S. Viciu, S.P. Nolan, B.W. Skelton, A.H. White, J.
Organomet. Chem. 690 (2005) 6133.
[12] D.S. McGuinness, J.A. Suttil, M.G. Gardiner, N.W. Davies, Organometallics 27
(2008) 4238.
X-ray data were collected with a Bruker AXS SMART APEX dif-
fractometer, using Mo Ka radiation at 223 K (2) and 296 K (cis–
anti-3), with the SMART suite of Programs [31]. Data were processed
and corrected for Lorentz and polarisation effects with SAINT [32],
and for absorption effect with SADABS [33]. Structural solution and
refinement were carried out with the SHELXTL suite of programs
[34]. The structure was solved by direct methods to locate the hea-
vy atoms, followed by difference maps for the light, non-hydrogen
atoms. All hydrogen atoms were put at calculated positions. All
[13] F.E. Hahn, L. Wittenbecher, R. Boese, D. Bläser, Chem. Eur. J. 5 (1999) 1931.
[14] F.E. Hahn, L. Wittenbecher, D. Le Van, R. Fröhlich, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 39
(2000) 541.