Although the result was less than satisfactory, an interest-
ing finding was that diethyl phosphine oxide could be
activated by a base. At this stage, it was thought that an
appropriate base which could activate the dialkyl phosphine
oxides, and depress the SN2′ reaction would facilitate the
substitution reaction. We next tested some alkaline metal
carbonates. It was found that the addition of 1.5 equiv of
sodium carbonate significantly accelerated the asymmetric
substitution in moderate yield and good enantioselectivity
(Table 1, entry 3). Lithium carbonate and potassium carbon-
ate each increased the reaction, but showed lower enanti-
oselectivities (Table 1, entries 4 and 5). The addition of
cesium carbonate resulted in significantly diminished yield
due to the background reaction (Table 1, entry 6). Of the
base tested, sodium carbonate showed the most promising
result. Compared with our previous protocols, the addition
of 4 Å MS and the use of xylenes as the solvent had no
positive effect. By lowering the reaction temperature to 0
°C, the ee was improved to 95% (Table 1, entry 8).
Having established that the system quinidine12/Na2CO3 can
accelerate the substitution reaction, we next examined the
scope and limitation of the reaction (Table 2). Generally, a
wide range of MBH carbonates 1 and dialkylphosphine
oxides 2 were suitable for the reaction, affording allylic
phosphine oxides 4 in moderate yields and excellent enan-
tioselectivities. It appears that the position and electronic
properties of substituents on aromatic rings have a limited
effect on the efficiency of this process (Table 2, entries
1-10). Unfortunately, when 2-furyl-substituted MBH car-
bonate was used, only moderate ee was obtained (Table 2,
entry 11). For less reactive alkyl-substituted MBH carbon-
ates, the reaction showed much lower reactivity.13 Moreover,
the scope of the reaction can be successfully extended
utilizing other dialkyl phosphine oxides 2b-d, and high
enantioselectivities were generally achieved (Table 2, entries
12-14).
Table 2. Scope of the Reactiona
entry
1, R1
1a, Ph
1b, 2-FPh
1c, 2-ClPh
2, R2
product yieldb (%) eec (%)
1
2
3
2a, Et
2a, Et
2a, Et
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
4f
4g
4h
4i
4j
4k
4l
4m
4n
73
66
63
61
80
87
75
78
76
83
48
81
63
92
95
91
95
90
94
95
92
96
95
96
71
90
98
90
4
5
6
1d, 2-MeOPh 2a, Et
1e, 3-ClPh 2a, Et
1f, 3-MeOPh 2a, Et
7
8
9
1g, 4-FPh
1h, 4-ClPh
1i, 4-BrPh
2a, Et
2a, Et
2a, Et
10
11
12
13
14
1j, 4-MeOPh 2a, Et
1k, 2-furyl
1a, Ph
2a, Et
2b, n-Pr
2c, n-Bu
2d, allylic
1a, Ph
1a, Ph
a All reactions were performed with 0.20 mmol of 1, 0.50 mmol of 2,
0.30 mmol of Na2CO3, and 0.04 mmol of quinidine in 1.0 mL of toluene
at 0 °C for 72 h. b Isolated yield. c For analysis of the ee values of the
products, see the Supporting Information.
Table 3. Control Experimentsa
entry
catalyst
base
yieldb (%)
eec (%)
1
2
3
4
5
none
Na2CO3
none
Na2CO3
Na2CO3
Na2CO3
quinidine
quinidine
cinchonine
QD-TMSd
81
78
21
92
88
nde
a All reactions were performed with 0.20 mmol of 1a, 0.50 mmol of
2a, 0.30 mmol of base, and 0.04 mmol of catalyst in 1.0 mL of toluene at
room temperature for 48 h. b Isolated yield. c Determined by chiral HPLC
on a Chiralpak AD column. d The hydroxyl group of quinidine was protected
by TMSCl. e Not determined.
To provide more insight into the mechanism, control
experiments were performed. As shown in Table 3, neither
quinidine nor Na2CO3 on its own was effective enough to
accelerate the substitution of MBH carbonate with diethyl
phosphine oxide (Table 3, entries 1 and 2). Only when these
two were used synergistically in a double-activation way
could this transformation perform excellently (Table 3, entry
3). These results showed that both the activation of diethyl
phosphine oxide and the assistance of the nucleophilic
catalyst were essential for the substitution reaction.14 Next,
we investigated the role of the C-6-OMe of quinidine, which
showed little effect on the reaction. When cinchonine was
used as the catalyst, similar result was observed (Table 3,
entry 3 vs 4). Furthermore, protection of C-9-OH of quinidine
gave a poor result (Table 3, entry 5). This result showed
that hydrogen bonding between the hydroxyl group and
sodium phosphinite plays a key role in the reaction.15 On
(10) (a) Hong, L.; Sun, W.; Liu, C.; Zhao, D.; Wang, R. Chem. Commun.
2010, 46, 2856. (b) Zhao, D.; Mao, L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, D.; Zhang, Q.;
Wang, R. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1880. (c) Zhao, D.; Yuan, Y.; Chan, A. S. C.;
Wang, R. Chem.sEur. J. 2009, 15, 2738. (d) Zhao, D.; Wang, Y.; Mao,
L.; Wang, R. Chem.sEur. J. 2009, 15, 10983.
(11) For selected examples of base-catalyzed SN2′ reaction, see: (a)
Reddy, L. R.; Hu, B.; Prashad, M.; Prasad, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 172. (b) Im, Y. J.; Lee, K. Y.; Kim, T. H.; Kim, J. N. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 4675. (c) Kim, J. N.; Chung, Y. M.; Im, Y. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 6209. (d) Kim, J. N.; Lee, H. J.; Lee, K. Y.; Kim, H. S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3737.
(14) For the mechanism of substitution reaction of MBH carbonates
catalyzed by a nucleophilic catalyst, see: Basavaiah, D.; Rao, A. J.;
Satyanarayana, T. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 811, and ref 6.
(15) For selected examples of Cinchona alkaloids as bifunctional
catalysts, see: (a) Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Tang, L.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 9906. (b) Li, H.; Song, J.; Liu, X.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 8948. (c) Wang, J.; Li, H.; Zu, L.; Wang, W. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 1391. (d) Wang, J.; Heikkinen, L. D.; Li, H.; Zu, L.; Jiang, W.; Xie, H.;
Wang, W. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 1052. (e) Bartoli, G.; Bosco, M.;
Carlone, A.; Cavalli, A.; Locatelli, M.; Mazzanti, A.; Ricci, P.; Sambri, L.;
Melchiorre, P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4966. (f) Lou, S.; Taoka,
B. M.; Ting, A.; Schaus, S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11256.
(12) For a review on modified Cinchona alkaloids, see: Tian, S.-K.;
Chen, Y.; Hang, J.; Tang, L.; McDaid, P.; Deng, L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004,
37, 621.
(13) The same phenomenon was observed in other allylic nucleophilic
substitution of alkyl-substituted MBH carbonates, see refs 6a, c, h and
10a.
3916
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 17, 2010