3956
S. A. Caldarelli et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 3953–3956
activities were obtained for the methylthiocarbonate prodrug 22
and for the 2-fluoroethyl derivative 30. Irrespective of the mode
of administration, both derivatives were more potent in vivo than
the parent drug T4 (oral ED50 = 1.3 and 3.8 mg/kg, respectively).
Pyrrolidine thiocarbamate derivatives 31 and 32 were also evalu-
ated. 31 showed low in vitro and in vivo activities. The presence
of the electron withdrawing carbonyl group in 32 probably en-
hances the rate of the thiocarbonate bond hydrolysis, resulting in
better IC50 and quite good in vivo activity.
(22, 6.45; 30, 7.04; 18, 6.68 and 3, 6.20)26 compared to the weaker
active ones.
The thiocarbonate derivative 22 appears to be the most power-
ful. Indeed, it is 3–4 times more potent than previously reported
TE3 prodrug (3). To our knowledge, this class of antimalarials rep-
resents one of the most potent in the rodent model tested yet, and
preliminary studies on efficacy and tolerance of these compounds
in mice and primates are very promising, indicating that this ap-
proach may be applicable to the human infection.24
Then six O-acylated T3 prodrugs were evaluated (Table 3). Com-
pound 33 (R2 = isopropyl) exhibited the highest in vitro activity
within the series (7 nM). However, this prodrug showed a poor
ED50 probably due to its high lipophilic character and to a fast pro-
drug–drug conversion rate. The introduction of a polar function
within the R2 moiety led to derivative 34 which showed lower
in vitro activities but interestingly oral activities in the range of
the parent T3 drug. In order to decrease the converting rate, we
introduced a 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl group (compound 35), with
donor electronic properties or a steric demanding 2-methylphenyl
substituents (compound 36). Both compounds showed high IC50
values, which decreased after pre-incubation, and low in vivo
activities (ED50 >60 mg/kg). These results may be associated to
an incomplete prodrug–drug transformation.
Acknowledgements
These studies were supported by the European Commission
(AntiMal integrated project LSHP-CT-2005-018834). We are grate-
ful to Yann Bordat for assistance in testing the compounds.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
In order to get a low molecular weight prodrug the cyclic thio-
carbonate prodrug 3 was prepared. This derivative showed an
in vitro IC50 = 2.2 nM and the oral activity was enhanced
(ED50 = 5 mg/kg).19 However, pharmacokinetics data showed that
this compound is rapidly converted into T3 in the gastrointestinal
tract. To slow up the conversion rate we prepared a structural ana-
logue of 3, the dithiocarbonate 37, which should be more stable to-
wards esterase hydrolysis. Thereby, 37 appeared to be less active
(IC50 of 4400 nM), probably due to an incomplete conversion and
a decreased oral activity was also observed (ED50 >30 mg/kg).
Aiming to improve the oral bio-availability of our lead com-
pounds T3 and T4, we focused our efforts on a library of 37 thioes-
ter, thiocarbonate and thiocarbamate neutral precursors. These
derivatives were obtained in one or two steps with yields ranging
from 15% to 96% and using a low cost synthetic pathway. Compar-
ison of compounds 6–10 to 4, 13 and 14 to 12, and 35 to 36,
showed that the presence of bulky groups contiguous to the thio-
ester moiety leads to lower antimalarial in vitro and in vivo activ-
ities. These results suggest that with hindered substituents the
conversion does not occur or is incomplete. Thus, a pre-incubation
period in the culture environment (before P. falciparum infection)
allowed in some cases to improve the in vitro activity (13, 14
and 36). Similarly, electron donor substituents decrease the con-
version rate (compare 35–33) and electron withdrawing groups
accelerate the hydrolysis (32–31). Lipophilicity of the prodrug
derivatives may be modulated by the introduction of a protonat-
able side chain. Thus, compounds 2, 20 and 21 exhibited excellent
in vitro antimalarial activity (IC50 = 1.5–2.8 nM) but displayed lim-
ited oral absorption. It is noteworthy that, at the contrary to most
of the other TE prodrugs (which are liquids) these three amine-
containing derivatives behave as solids, easy-to-handle and appro-
priate for an oral therapy. Among all prodrugs evaluated in vivo
against the lethal rodent malaria, P. vickei, derivatives 18, 22, 30,
and 3 were more potent (either by intraperitonial and oral admin-
istration) than the parent drugs T4 and T3. The common features of
these compounds are a low molecular weight (18, 713.0 g/mol; 22,
632.9 g/mol; 30, 696.9 g/mol and 3, 540.7 g/mol) and a low c log P
2. Snow, R. W.; Guerra, C. A.; Noor, A. M.; Myint, H. Y.; Hay, S. I. Nature 2005, 434,
214.
3. Baird, J. K. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 1565.
4. Greenwood, B. M.; Fidock, D. A.; Kyle, D. E.; Kappe, S. H.; Alonso, P. L.; Collins, F.
H.; Duffy, P. E. J. Clin. Invest. 2008, 118, 1266.
6. Biagini, G. A.; Richier, E.; Bray, P. G.; Calas, M.; Vial, H.; Ward, S. A. Antimicrob.
Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 2584.
7. Fidock, D. A.; Rosenthal, P. J.; Croft, S. L.; Brun, R.; Nwaka, S. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc.
2004, 3, 509.
8. Holz, G. G. Bull. World Health Organ. 1977, 55, 237.
9. Vial, H. J.; Eldin, P.; Tielens, A. G.; Van Hellemond, J. J. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
2003, 126, 143.
10. Vial, H.; Ben Mamoun, C. In Molecular Approach to Malaria; Sherman, I., Ed.;
ASM Press: Washington DC, 2005; pp 327–352.
11. Vial, H. J.; Calas, M. In Rosenthal, P. J., Ed.; Antimalarial Chemotherapy:
Mechanisms of Action, Resistance, and New Directions in Drug Discovery;
Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, 2001; pp 347–363.
12. Ancelin, M. L.; Calas, M.; Bompart, J.; Cordina, G.; Martin, D.; Ben Bari, M.; Jei,
T.; Druilhe, P.; Vial, H. J. Blood 1998, 91, 1426.
13. Ancelin, M. L.; Calas, M.; Bonhoure, A.; Herbute, S.; Vial, H. J. Antimicrob. Agents
Chemother. 2003, 47, 2598.
14. Calas, M.; Ancelin, M. L.; Cordina, G.; Portefaix, P.; Piquet, G.; Vidal-Sailhan, V.;
Vial, H. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 505.
15. Calas, M.; Cordina, G.; Bompart, J.; Bari, M. B.; Jei, T.; Ancelin, M. L.; Vial, H. J.
Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 3557.
16. Wengelnik, K.; Vidal, V.; Ancelin, M. L.; Cathiard, A. M.; Morgat, J. L.; Kocken, C.
H.; Calas, M.; Herrera, S.; Thomas, A. W.; Vial, H. J. Science 2002, 295, 1311.
17. Hamze, A.; Rubi, E.; Arnal, P.; Boisbrun, M.; Carcel, C.; Salom-Roig, X.;
Maynadier, M.; Wein, S.; Vial, H.; Calas, M. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 3639.
18. Salom-Roig, X. J.; Hamzé, A.; Calas, M.; Vial, H. J. Comb. Chem. High Throughput
Screening 2005, 8, 49.
19. Vial, H. J.; Wein, S.; Farenc, C.; Kocken, C.; Nicolas, O.; Ancelin, M. L.; Bressolle,
F.; Thomas, A.; Calas, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 15458.
20. Matsukawa, T.; Yuguri, S.; Oka, Y. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1962, 98, 430.
21. Kawasaki, C. In Vitamins and Hormones; Harris, R. S., Ed.; Academic Press:
New York, 1963; Vol. 21, pp 69–109.
22. Thomson, A. D.; Frank, O.; Baker, H.; Leevy, C. M. Ann. Intern. Med. 1971, 74,
529.
23. Bitsch, R.; Wolf, M.; Moller, J.; Heuzeroth, L.; Gruneklee, D. Ann. Nutr. Metab.
1991, 35, 292.
24. Nicolas, O.; Margout, D.; Taudon, N.; Calas, M.; Vial, H. J.; Bressolle, F. J.
Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2005, 820, 83.
25. Bundgaard, H.; Jensen, E.; Falch, E. Pharm. Res. 1991, 8, 1087.