absorption spectrum exhibits one p–p* transition band with
lmax (335 nm for both) and e values (Table 1) consistent with
the chromophore units (a higher energy band attributable to
the aryls attaching the two chromophores is also observed).
11, the model for the lower p-system of OC2, has a similar
Calhoun Honors College for support through the EUREKA!
program.
Notes and references
l
max (330 nm) to that in OC2. 13, the model for the lower deck
1 R. C. Smith, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2009, 30, 2067.
2 G. C. Bazan, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 8615.
in OC1, however, has lmax of 356 nm. The red shift for the
transition in 13 versus the similar unit in OC1 is attributable to
the constrained nature of the OC1. In 13, methoxy units act as
strong electron donors, whereas the constrained geometry of
OC1 does not permit the planarization at oxygen necessary for
the substituents to act as resonance donors. Further support
for this explanation comes from model 9, a model for OC1
lacking the upper chromophore. Because 9 lacks the upper
chromophore, it is less constrained than OC1, but still more
constrained than 13. Predictably, the lmax for 9 lies between
values for 13 and OC1. Both the OCs have the same upper
chromophore, which we attempted to model with 10. 10 has
lmax = 335 nm, the same value as observed in the OCs.
In contrast to the absorption spectra, significant differences
should be manifest in the photoluminescence properties of
OC1 and OC2. Systems in which face-to-face inter-p-system
interactions are operative (i.e., OC1) are predisposed to
intramolecular energy/electron transfer (internal quenching
rather than fluorescence) and may be expected to have low
photoluminescence quantum yields (F). Systems in which
p-systems are orthogonal (i.e., OC2), however, are not
expected to undergo intermolecular energy/electron transfer
processes, and should display higher F values. The remarkably
3 J. E. Klare, G. S. Tulevski, K. Sugo, A. de Picciotto, K. A. White
and C. Nuckolls, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 6030.
4 R. R. Tykwinski, M. Schreiber, R. Perez Carlon, F. Diederich and
V. Gramlich, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1996, 79, 2249.
5 E. L. Spitler, L. D. Shirtcliff and M. M. Haley, J. Org. Chem.,
2007, 72, 86.
6 S. Samori, S. Tojo, M. Fujitsuka, E. L. Spitler, M. M. Haley and
T. Majima, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 3551.
7 E. L. Spitler, J. M. Monson and M. M. Haley, J. Org. Chem., 2008,
73, 2211.
8 J. Pina, J. Seixas de Melo, H. D. Burrows, F. Galbrecht, A. Bilge,
C. J. Kudla and U. Scherf, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2008, 112, 1104.
9 A. Bilge, A. Zen, M. Forster, H. Li, F. Galbrecht, B. S. Nehls,
T. Farrell, D. Neher and U. Scherf, J. Mater. Chem., 2006, 16,
3177.
10 J. N. Wilson, K. I. Hardcastle, M. Josowicz and U. H. F. Bunz,
Tetrahedron, 2004, 60, 7157.
11 J. N. Wilson and U. H. F. Bunz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
4124.
12 J. Tolosa, A. J. Zucchero and U. H. F. Bunz, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2008, 130, 6498.
13 S. He, A. E. Dennis and R. C. Smith, Macromol. Rapid Commun.,
2009, 30, 2079.
14 I. Osaka and R. D. McCullough, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 1202.
15 J. K. Mwaura, M. R. Pinto, D. Witker, N. Ananthakrishnan,
K. S. Schanze and J. R. Reynolds, Langmuir, 2005, 21, 10119.
16 T. Kietzke, D. Neher, M. Kumke, R. Montenegro, K. Landfester
and U. Scherf, Macromolecules, 2004, 37, 4882.
17 C. Akbayir, F. Bulut, T. Farrell, A. Goldschmidt, R. Guentner,
A. P. Kam, P. Miclea, U. Scherf, J. Seekamp, V. G. Solovyev and
C. M. S. Torres, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci., 2003, 5, 205.
18 K. M. Coakley and M. D. McGehee, Chem. Mater., 2004, 16,
4533.
19 J. Roncali, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 711.
20 J. Cornil, D. Beljonne, J.-P. Calbert and J.-L. Bredas, Adv. Mater.,
2001, 13, 1053.
21 U. Scherf and E. J. W. List, Adv. Mater., 2002, 14, 477.
22 J.-L. Bredas, D. Beljonne, V. Coropceanu and J. Cornil, Chem.
Rev., 2004, 104, 4971.
different
F values for OC2 (0.52) and OC1 (0.012)
unequivocally demonstrate the influence of the scaffolds on
the fate of absorbed energy. DFT calculations suggest that the
HOMO and LUMO are geometrically separate in OC1,
reminiscent of cruciforms. These data suggest that internal
energy transfer or internal self-quenching of fluorescence may
be possible in OC1. Even the presence of the unmodified aryl
in 9 (F = 0.007) is apparently sufficient for nonradiative
quenching via intramolecular interaction, suggesting a vibra-
tional relaxation mechanism is also viable. The exceedingly
low quantum yield of OC1 is particularly noteworthy when
compared to any of the models 11 and 13 and 10 and 12, all of
which have high quantum yields (0.40–0.58), similar to OC2.
In summary, synthetic routes have been developed to
produce synthetically versatile tetrahalogenated m-terphenyl
oxacyclophanes and to derivatize these scaffolds with up to
four p-conjugated substituents. The utility of the oxacyclo-
phanes to scaffold p-conjugated systems in discrete geometries
should have application in the rational design of materials
exhibiting energy/charge transfer or high photoluminescence.
The simple attachment strategy and modularity of upper and
lower components leads to facile elaboration of these materials
to include additional and mixed chromophore systems and
semiconducting p-conjugated polymers.35 Studies are underway
to gain further insights into other inter-p-system influences
that may be accessible with these scaffolds.
23 K. M. Knoblock, C. J. Silvestri and D. M. Collard, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2006, 128, 13680.
24 F. Salhi and D. M. Collard, Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, 81.
25 T. Vinod and H. Hart, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 881.
26 T. K. Vinod and H. Hart, Top. Curr. Chem., 1994, 172, 119.
27 B. P. Morgan, R. J. Gilliard, R. S. Loungani and R. C. Smith,
Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2009, 30, 1399.
28 K. Tsuji, S. Sasaki and M. Yoshifuji, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40,
3203.
29 L. Ma, R. A. Woloszynek, W. Chen, T. Ren and
J. D. Protasiewicz, Organometallics, 2006, 25, 3301.
30 P. Liu, Y. Chen, J. Deng and Y. Tu, Synthesis, 2001, 2078.
31 Techniques included 1H and 13C 1D spectra, 1H–1H Correlation
Spectroscopy (COSY), Heteronuclear Multiple Quantum
Coherence (HMQC), Distortionless Enhancement by Polarization
Transfer (DEPT) and Differential Nuclear Overhauser Effect (NOE).
Spectra and full spectral assignments are provided in the ESIw.
32 W. L. Jorgensen and D. L. Severance, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990,
112, 4768.
33 See ESIw.
34 Y. Morisaki and Y. Chujo, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 6430.
35 Stille, Heck, and Suzuki coupling to append small molecule
chromophores and polymers to these and related cores have
proven successful. Full reports on each of these themes are
currently in preparation.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation
through a CAREER award (CHE-0847132). GAR thanks the
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
5138 | Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 5136–5138