2216
R.S. Walmsley et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 363 (2010) 2215–2221
lowed to proceed for a further 2 h. The precipitate was collected,
washed with water, then methanol and dried at 100 °C. Yield:
56.9%. IR (cmꢀ1, KBr disk): 931,
(V@O); 3260, (N–H); 1609,
(C@N). Anal. Calc. for C18H18N4O3V: C, 55.53; H, 4.66; N, 14.39.
Found: C, 55.43; H, 4.74; N, 14.16%. UV–Vis (DMSO) kmax
ꢀ1 cmꢀ1): 617 (55), 542 (44), 403sh (196).
Upon standing the synthetic mother liquor at room tempera-
2. Experimental
m
m
2.1. Materials, methods and instrumentation
m
(e,
All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources (Sig-
ma–Aldrich, Merck) and used without further purification. Sol-
vents were of reagent grade. All oxovanadium(IV) complexes
were synthesized under an argon atmosphere.
M
ture and under aerobic conditions, yellow crystals of
[VO2(pimin)(piminH0)] (1b) were obtained. Yield wrt V: 12.3%. IR
The infrared spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer 2000 FTIR
spectrometer in the mid-IR range (4000–400 cmꢀ1) as KBr pellets.
1H and 13C NMR spectra of all ligands were recorded on a Bruker
AMX 400 NMR MHz spectrometer and reported relative to tetra-
methylsilane (d 0.00). Electronic spectra were recorded on a Varian
Cary 500 Scan UV–Vis spectrophotometer using 1 cm quartz cells
and dimethylsulfoxide as the solvent. Microanalysis was carried
out using a Vario Elementar Microcube ELIII. Cyclic voltammetry
was performed using a BAS CV 100 Cyclic Voltammogram. Potenti-
ometric studies were performed using a Metrohm 794 Titrino
equipped with a Metrohm LL Ecotrode. A Bio-Tek KC4 powerwave
XS microtiter plate reader was used to measure absorbance for 3-
(cmꢀ1, KBr disk): 931, 886,
m(V@O); 3191, m(N–H); 1617, m(C@N).
Anal. Calc. for C18H19N4O4V: C, 53.21; H, 4.71; N, 13.79. Found: C,
53.14; H, 4.71; N, 13.82%.
2.2.5. [VO(Etpimin)2] (2)
This was prepared in a similar manner as above except that
EtpiminH was used. Yield: 47.6%. IR (cmꢀ1, KBr disk): 987,
m
(V@O); 1602,
5.88; N, 12.58. Found: C, 59.04; H, 5.88; N, 12.27%. UV–Vis (DMSO)
kmax
, Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1): 621 (120), 547 (99), 401sh (300).
m(C@N). Anal. Calc. for C22H26N4O3V: C, 59.32; H,
(e
(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl
(MTT) and Glucose assays.
tetrazolium
bromide
2.2.6. [VO(EtOHpimin)2] (3)
This was prepared in a similar manner as for 1a except that
EtOHpiminH was used. Yield: 52%. IR (cmꢀ1, KBr disk): 966,
m
(V@O); 1603,
5.49; N, 11.74. Found: C, 55.30; H, 5.63; N, 11.66%. UV–Vis (DMSO)
kmax
, Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1): 625 (84), 548 (66), 404sh (269).
m(C@N). Anal. Calc. for C22H26N4O5V: C, 55.35; H,
2.2. Preparative work
2.2.1. 2-(20-Hydroxyphenyl)-1H-imidazoline (piminH)
(e
Methyl salicylate (1.84 g, 0.012 mol) was added to an excess of
ethylenediamine (3.2 g, 0.053 mol) in a conical flask and heated in
a microwave for 7 min at 180 W. Excess ethylenediamine was dis-
tilled off under reduced pressure until a solid material was left be-
hind. This solid was then digested overnight in chloroform, filtered
and then washed with cold chloroform to afford a cream solid.
Yield: 78.1%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 3.71 (s, 4H, Im–
CH2), 6.69 (t, 1H, Ar–H) 6.77 (d, 1H, Ar–H), 7.27 (t, 1H, Ar–H),
7.56 (d, 1H, Ar–H). 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 46.5, 110.2,
115.5, 118.4, 127.2, 132.7, 163.5, 166.1; IR (cmꢀ1, KBr disk):
2.3. Cyclic voltammetry
Cyclic voltammograms of 1a, 2 and 3 were recorded using a
glassy carbon electrode as the working electrode, platinum wire
as the counter electrode and silver chloride-coated silver wire as
the reference electrode. For all complexes, DMSO was used as the
solvent and tetrabutylammonium perchlorate was used as the sup-
porting electrolyte. Argon was bubbled through the solutions for
5 min before each run. A scan rate of 100 mV sꢀ1 was used.
3217, m(N–H); 1618, m(C@N). Anal. Calc. for C9H10N2O: C, 66.65;
H, 6.21; N, 17.27. Found: C, 66.68; H, 6.20; N, 16.98%.
2.4. Potentiometric studies
2.2.2. 2-(20-Hydroxyphenyl)-1-ethylimidazoline (EtpiminH)
The protonation and stability constants for the ligands and oxo-
vanadium(IV) complexes were determined by potentiometric titra-
tion of approximately 25 ml samples. All solutions were prepared
using freshly boiled and degassed deionized milli-Q water to en-
sure the removal of dissolved oxygen and carbon dioxide. The li-
gand concentration was 1 mM and metal-to-ligand ratios of 1:1,
1:5 and 1:10 were used. Titrations were performed over the pH
range of 2–11 under a continuous flow of purified nitrogen using
HCl and tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAOH). The vana-
dium stock solution containing 0.10 M HCl was standardized by
titration with permanganate. The ionic strength of the titration
solutions was kept constant at 0.10 M tetramethylammonium
chloride (TMACl). Titrations were controlled using Tiamo software.
The glass electrode was calibrated for a strong acid–base reaction
by the Gran-method [17] using the program GLEE [18], to deter-
mine the standard potential Eo. The ionic product of water (pKw)
of 13.83(1) at 25.0 0.1 °C in 0.10 M TMACl was used in all
calculations [19]. The hydrolysis model of a vanadyl system was
included in the model; [VO(OH)]+ (log b10ꢀ1 = ꢀ5.94) and
This was prepared in a similar manner as above except that N-
ethylethylenediamine was used. Yield: 50.3%. 1H NMR (d, 400 MHz,
CDCl3): 1.26 (t, 3H, N–CH2CH3), 3.42 (q, 2H, N–CH2), 3.50 (t, 2H,
Im–CH2), 3.91 (t, 2H, Im–CH2), 6.76 (t, 1H, Ar–H), 6.98 (d, 1H,
Ar–H), 7.27 (t, 1H, Ar–H), 7.36 (t, 1H, Ar–H). 13C NMR (d,
400 MHz, CDCl3): 14.50, 45.52, 50.47, 50.92, 112.31, 117.11,
118.66, 127.31, 132.16, 162.19, 167.09. IR (cmꢀ1, KBr disk): 1608,
m(C@N); Anal. Calc. for C11H14N2O: C, 69.45; H, 7.42; N, 14.73.
Found: C, 69.54; H, 7.67; N, 14.44%.
2.2.3. 2-(20-Hydroxyphenyl)-1-ethanolimidazoline (EtOHpiminH)
This was prepared in a similar manner as for piminH above ex-
cept that N-ethanolethylenediamine was used. Yield: 54.1%. 1H
NMR (d, 400 MHz, D2O): 3.57 (t, 2H, N–CH2), 3.79 (t, 2H, N–
CH2CH2), 4.11 (m, 4H, Im–CH2), 6.70 (t, 1H, Ar–H), 6.76 (d, 1H,
Ar–H), 7.27 (d, 1H, Ar–H), 7.43 (t, 1H, Ar–H). 13C NMR (d,
400 MHz, D2O): 43.13, 49.15, 49.19, 58.18, 112.21, 114.18,
121.81, 130.19, 134.93, 166.02, 169.49. IR (cmꢀ1, KBr disk): 3138
[(VO)2(OH)2]2+ (log b20ꢀ2 = ꢀ6.95), while [VO(OH)3]ꢀ (log b10ꢀ3
=
m(O–H); 1612, m(C@N). Anal. Calc. for C11H14N2O2: C, 64.06; H,
ꢀ18.0) and [(VO)2(OH)5]ꢀ (log b20ꢀ5 = ꢀ22.0) [20] did not fit. The
concentration stability constants bpqr = [MpLqHr]/[M]p[L]q[H]r were
calculated by using the computer program HYPERQUAD [21]. The final
values of the constants were obtained from an average of six inde-
pendent titrations using an average of 400 data points in total for
each refinement.
6.84; N, 13.58. Found: C, 64.31; H, 6.55; N, 13.44%.
2.2.4. [VO(pimin)2] (1a)
To a solution of Hpimin (0.25 g, 1.5 mmol) in methanol (5 ml)
was added vanadyl sulfate (0.152 g, 0.70 mmol) in water (5 ml).
A blue–green precipitate formed immediately. The reaction was al-