regioselectivity. While recent years have witnessed a number
of reports on the construction of the indene ring system5,6
that is present in many biologically relevant molecules,7
chemical catalysts,8 and materials,9 these methods require
expensive reagents/catalysts and/or lengthy synthetic se-
quences and introduce very limited functional groups into
the indene ring system in a direct fashion. Herein, we wish
to report an unprecedented protocol for the regioselective
synthesis of various functionalized indene derivatives from
readily accessible N-benzylic sulfonamides and disubstituted
alkynes in the presence of an inexpensive and environmen-
tally benign iron Lewis acid catalyst.10
Gratifyingly, the yield was increased to 66% when the
reaction temperature was elevated to 80 °C despite the fact
that product 3a was partially consumed through its alkylation
with sulfonamide 1a (Table 1, entry 1).11,12 In addition, a
Table 1. FeCl3-Catalyzed Regioselective Synthesis of Indene
Derivatives from Sulfonamide 1a and Disubstituted Alkynesa
A number of Brønsted and Lewis acids (10 mol %) were
evaluated in the model reaction of N-(p-toluenesulfonyl)-
benzhydrylamine (1a) with diphenylacetylene (2a) in ni-
tromethane at room temperature for 24 h. While almost no
desired reaction took place in the presence of TsOH, H2SO4,
HCl, ZnCl2, CuCl2, Pd(OAc)2, AlCl3, or Bi2(SO4)3, the use
of FeCl3 resulted in the formation of 1,2,3-triphenyl-1H-
indene (3a) in 20% yield. The efforts to enhance yield proved
fruitless by replacing nitromethane with acetonitrile, dichlo-
romethane, acetone, ethyl acetate, or 1,2-dichloroethane.
entry
2
R1
R2
product time/h yieldb/%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
2a Ph
2b 4-MeOC6H4 Ph
Ph
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
12
5
66
75
53
60
74
83
66
69
43
58
72
61
66
72
2c Ph
2d Ph
2e Ph
2f Ph
2g Ph
2h Ph
2i SPh
2j SePh
2k Br
2l Br
2m Cl
4-O2NC6H4
n-Pr
24
10
24
24
24
24
3
COOEt
COOH
COPh
COMe
Ph
3g
3h
3i
(5) For recent examples on indene synthesis via bimolecular cyclization,
see: (a) Wu, L.; Shi, M.; Li, Y. Chem.sEur. J. 2010, 16, 5163. (b) Sun,
Z.-M.; Chen, S.-P.; Zhao, P. Chem.sEur. J. 2010, 16, 2619. (c) Wang, S.;
Zhu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lu, P. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2615. (d) Zhang, X.; Teo,
W. T.; Chan, P. W. H. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4990. (e) Zhou, F.; Yang, M.;
Lu, X. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1405. (f) Fukutani, T.; Umeda, N.; Hirano, K.;
Satoh, T.; Miura, M. Chem. Commun. 2009, 5141. (g) Park, E. J.; Kim,
S. H.; Chang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17268. (h) Chen, W.; Cao,
J.; Huang, X. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5537. (i) Miyamoto, M.; Harada, Y.;
Tobisu, M.; Chatani, N. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2975. (j) Liu, C.-C.; Korivi,
R. P.; Cheng, C.-H. Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 9503. (k) Deng, R.; Sun, L.;
Li, Z. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5207. (l) Basavaiah, D.; Reddy, K. R. Org. Lett.
2007, 9, 57. (m) Zhang, D.; Liu, Z.; Yum, E. K.; Larock, R. C. J. Org.
Ph
Ph
3j
6
3k
3l
3m
3n
4
n-Bu
Ph
24
12
6
2n
I
Ph
a Reaction conditions: sulfonamide 1a (0.20 mmol), alkyne 2 (0.24
mmol), FeCl3 (10 mol %), nitromethane (2.0 mL), 80 °C. b Isolated yield.
gram-scale synthesis of indene derivative 3a (2.34 g, 68%
yield) was successfully performed according to this protocol.
In the presence of 10 mol % of FeCl3, the reaction of
sulfonamide 1a with a diphenylacetylene bearing either an
electron-donating or an electron-withdrawing group pro-
ceeded smoothly to afford the corresponding indene deriva-
tive with greater than 99:1 regioselectivity (Table 1, entries
2 and 3).13 Subsequently, an alkyl, an alkoxycarbonyl, a
carboxyl, and an acyl group were introduced exclusively into
the C-2 positions of indene derivatives by employing the
corresponding functionalized disubstituted alkynes (Table 1,
entries 4-8). Moreover, a range of alkynyl chalcogenides
and alkynyl halides served as suitable substrates to react with
sulfonamide 1a and consequently, provided a convenient
access to the indene derivatives bearing heretoatoms such
as sulfur, selenium, bromine, chlorine, and iodine at the C-3
Chem. 2007, 72, 251
.
(6) For recent examples on indene synthesis via unimolecular cyclization,
see :(a) Dai, L.-Z.; Shi, M. Chem.sEur. J. 2010, 16, 2496. (b) Kurouchi,
H.; Sugimoto, H.; Otani, Y.; Ohwada, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
807. (c) Yang, S.; Li, Z.; Jian, X.; He, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
3999. (d) Zhu, Z.-B.; Shi, M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5278. (e) Khan, Z. A.;
Wirth, T. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 229. (f) Womack, G. B.; Angeles, J. G.;
Fanelli, V. E.; Indradas, B.; Snowden, R. L.; Sonnay, P. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 74, 5738. (g) Tobisu, M.; Nakai, H.; Chatani, N. J. Org. Chem. 2009,
74, 5471. (h) Ye, S.; Gao, K.; Zhou, H.; Yang, X.; Wu, J. Chem. Commun.
2009, 5406. (i) Zhang, X.-M.; Tu, Y.-Q.; Jiang, Y.-J.; Zhang, Y.-Q.; Fan,
C.-A.; Zhang, F.-M. Chem. Commun. 2009, 4726. (j) Zhou, H.; Xie, Y.;
Ren, L.; Wang, K. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 1289. (k) Li, C.; Zeng,
Y.; Wang, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 2956. (l) Wang, J.; Zhang, L.;
Jing, Y.; Huang, W.; Zhou, X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 4978. (m) Hu,
B.; Xing, S.; Wang, Z. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5481. (n) Zhou, X.; Zhang, H.;
Xie, X.; Li, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3958. (o) Zhu, Z.-B.; Shi, M.
Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 10219. (p) Sanz, R.; Miguel, D.; Rodr´ıguez, F.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7354. (q) Guan, Z.-H.; Ren, Z.-H.; Zhao,
L.-B.; Liang, Y.-M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 1040. (r) Guo, L.-N.;
Duan, X.-H.; Hu, J.; Bi, H.-P.; Liu, X.-Y.; Liang, Y.-M. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2008, 1418. (s) Yadav, V. K.; Kumar, N. V.; Parvez, M. Chem. Commun.
2007, 2281. (t) Tsukamoto, H.; Ueno, T.; Kondo, Y. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
3033. (u) Shao, L.-X.; Zhang, Y.-P.; Qi, M.-H.; Shi, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
117. (v) Guo, L.-N.; Duan, X.-H.; Bi, H.-P.; Liu, X.-Y.; Liang, Y.-M. J.
(11) The corresponding monoalkylation product was obtained in 19%
Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 1538
.
yield on the basis of sulfonamide 1a. It is noteworthy that no other byproduct
1
(7) For reviews, see: (a) Huffman, J. W.; Padgett, L. W. Curr. Med.
Chem. 2005, 12, 1395. (b) Gao, H.; Katzenellenbogen, J. A.; Garg, R.;
Hansch, C. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 723.
was detected by H NMR analysis of the crude product.
(12) The yield was not further improved at 80 °C when FeCl3 was
replaced with the previously examined catalysts and a few other iron salts.
Catalyst (yield): TsOH (62%), ZnCl2 (40%), CuCl2 (28%), Pd(OAc)2 (4%),
AlCl3 (3%), Bi2(SO4)3 (57%), BiCl3 (20%), SnCl4·5H2O (9%), FeCl3·6H2O
(4%), Fe2(SO4)3·5H2O (7%), Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (8%), FeCl2·4H2O (0%), and
(8) For reviews, see: (a) Wang, B. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2006, 250, 242.
(b) Alt, H. G.; Ko¨ppl, A. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1205.
(9) For examples, see: (a) Barbera´, J.; Rakitin, O. A.; Ros, M. B.;
Torroba, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 296. (b) Yang, J.; Lakshmi-
kantham, M. V.; Cava, M. P.; Lorcy, D.; Bethelot, J. R. J. Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 6739.
FeSO4·7H2O (0%)
.
1
(13) No regioisomer was detected by H and 13C NMR analysis of the
CH group at the C-1 position of an indene derivative. The product
regiochemistry was assigned by 2D NOSEY analysis and/or by analogy.
For details, see the Supporting Information.
(10) For a review on the iron Lewis acid catalysis, see: Bolm, C.; Legros,
J.; Le Paih, J.; Zani, L. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 6217.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 17, 2010
3833