318
C.-W. Lee et al. / Dyes and Pigments 91 (2011) 317e323
Similar to porphyrin derivatives, perylenes are attractive molec-
spin-coating drops of H2PtCl6 solution onto ITO glass and heating at
380 ꢂC for 15 min. To prevent a short circuit, the two electrodes
were assembled into a cell of sandwich type and sealed with a hot-
ular components for application in molecular electronic devices
because of their great photostability and unique structures, and their
electrochemical and photophysical properties [20e23]. Several
perylene dyes for DSSC have been rationally designed and synthe-
sized with introduction of electron-donating groups and bulky
substituents to decrease aggregation. The most effective perylene
dyes show a power conversion efficiency of up to 6.8% [24,25].
melt film (SX1170, Solaronix, thickness 25
mm). The electrolyte
solution containing LiI (0.1 M), I2 (0.05 M), PMII (0.6 M), 4-tert-
butylpyridine (0.5 M) in a mixture of acetonitrile and valeronitrile
(volume ratio 1:1) was introduced into the space between the two
electrodes, so completing the fabrication of these DSSC devices.
On the basis of previous work, extension of p-conjugation of the
porphyrin dye appears to cause broadening of the absorption
bands, which is an essential requirement for an efficient sensitizer
[5e15,18,19]. We thus aim to construct electronically coupled
porphyrin-arene dyads as sensitizers for use in DSSC. Here, we
report the synthesis of porphyrin-perylene anhydride dyad 4 and
porphyrin- naphthalene anhydride dyad 5, and their optical, elec-
trochemical and photovoltaic properties. A perylene sensitizer (P1)
was also synthesized for comparison.
2.3. Photovoltaic characterization
The current-voltage characteristics of the devices were
measured with a solar simulator (AM 1.5, SAN-EI, XES-502S, type
class A) calibrated with a Si-based reference cell (VLSI standards,
Oriel PN 91150V). When the device is irradiated with the solar
simulator, the source meter (Keithley 2400, computer-controlled)
sends a voltage (V) to the device, and the photocurrent (I) is read
at each step controlled by a computer via a GPIB interface. The
2. Experimental
efficiency (
this relation,
h) of conversion of light to electricity is obtained with
h
¼ Jsc Voc FF/Pin, in which Jsc (mA cmꢁ2) is the current
All reagents and solvents were obtained from commercial
sources and used without further purification, unless otherwise
noted. CH2Cl2 was dried over CaH2 and freshly distilled before use.
THF was dried over sodium/benzophenone and freshly distilled
before use. Tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6)
was recrystallized twice from absolute ethanol and further dried for
two days under vacuum. Column chromatography was performed
on silica gel (Merck, 70e230 Mesh ASTM).
density measured at short circuit, and Voc (V) is the voltage
measured at open circuit. Pin is the input radiation power (for one-
sun illumination Pin ¼ 100 mW cmꢁ2) and FF is the filling factor. The
incident monochromatic efficiency for conversion from photons to
current (IPCE) spectra of the corresponding devices was measured
with a system comprising a Xe lamp (PTi A-1010, 150 W), mono-
chromator (Dongwoo DM150i, 1200 g/mm blazed at 500 nm), and
source meter (Keithley 2400, computer-controlled). A standard Si
photodiode (ThorLabs FDS1010) served as a reference to calibrate
the power density of the light source at each wavelength. Photo-
current densities of both the target device and the reference Si cell
were measured under the same experimental conditions (excita-
tion beam size w0.08 cm2) so to obtain the IPCE value of the device
from comparison of the current ratio and the value of the reference
cell at each wavelength.
2.1. Spectral and electrochemical measurements
1H NMR spectra (Varian spectrometer, 400 MHz), UVevisible
spectra (Varian Cary 50), UVevisibleeNIR spectra (Shimadzu UV-
3600), emission spectra (JASCO FP-6000 spectrofluorimeter), High
resolution mass spectra (LTQ Orbitrap XL, Thermo Fisher Scientific)
and FAB mass spectra (JMS-SX/SX102A Tandem Mass spectrometer)
were recorded on the indicated instruments. Electrochemical tests
were performed with a three-electrode potentiostat (CH Instru-
ments, Model 750A) in THF deoxygenated on purging with pre-
purified dinitrogen gas. Cyclic voltammetry was conducted with
a three-electrode cell equipped with a BAS glassy carbon disk
(0.07 cm2) as the working electrode, a platinum wire as auxiliary
electrode, and an Ag/AgCl (saturated) reference electrode; the
reference electrode is separated from the bulk solution with
a double junction filled with electrolyte solution. The working
2.4. Synthesis of dyes 4, 5, and P1
2.4.1. Zinc(II) 5,15-Bis(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-10-(bis(4-
octylphenyl)amino)-20-(3- (perylenedicarboxylic-9,10-anhydride)
ethynyl)porphyrin (4)
To a solution of porphyrin 2 [5] (26.4 mg, 0.02 mmol) in dry THF
(5 mL) was added tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) 1 M in THF
(0.08 mL, 0.08 mmol). The solution was stirred at 25 ꢂC for 30 min
under dinitrogen. The mixture was quenched with H2O and then
extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous
Na2SO4 and the solvent was removed undervacuum. The residue and
9-bromo-perylene-3,4-dicarboxylic anhydride (16.0 mg, 0.04 mmol)
were dissolved in dry THF (5 mL) and NEt3 (1 mL) and degassed with
electrode was polished with aluminium (0.03
mm) on felt pads
(Buehler) and treated ultrasonically for 1 min before each experi-
ment. The reproducibility of individual potential values was within
ꢀ5 mV.
dinitrogen for 10 min; then Pd2(dba)3 (2.2 mg, 2.5 mmol) and AsPh3
2.2. Device fabrication
(6 mg, 0.02 mmol) were added to the mixture. The solution was
heated under reflux for 3 h under dinitrogen. The solvent was
removed under vacuum. The residue was purified on a column
chromatograph (silica gel) using CH2Cl2/hexane ¼ 4/6 as eluent.
Recrystallization from CH2Cl2/CH3OH gave 4 (13.4 mg, 45%). 1H NMR
The porphyrins were sensitized onto TiO2 nanoparticulate films
to serve as working electrodes in DSSC devices. A paste composed
of TiO2 particles (w20 nm) for the transparent active layer was
coated on a TiCl4-treated FTO glass substrate (FTO, 8
repetitive screen printing to obtain the required film thickness
(w10 m). The TiO2 film was annealed according to a programmed
U
/cmꢁ2) with
(CDCl3, 400 MHz)
d
9.49 (d, J ¼ 4.4 Hz, 2H), 9.22 (d, J ¼ 4.8 Hz, 2H),
9.00 (d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz,1H), 8.94 (d, J ¼ 4.4 Hz, 2H), 8.77 (d, J ¼ 4.8 Hz, 2H),
8.42e8.36 (m, 2H), 8.18 (d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.12 (s, 4H), 7.99
(t, J ¼ 8.0 Hz,1H), 7.83 (s, 2H), 7.71 (br, 2H), 7.52 (br,1H), 7.45 (br,1H),
7.24 (d, J ¼ 8.4 Hz, 4H), 6.95 (d, J ¼ 8.4 Hz, 4H), 2.47 (t, J ¼ 7.6 Hz, 4H),
1.55 (s, 36H), 1.25 (m, 22H), 0.84 (m, 8H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz)
m
procedure: (1) heating at 80 ꢂC for 15 min; (2) heating at 135 ꢂC for
10 min; (3) heating at 325 ꢂC for 30 min; (4) heating at 375 ꢂC
for 5 min; (5) heating at 450 ꢂC for 15 min; (6) heating at 500 ꢂC for
15 min. For each dye P1, 4 and 5, the electrode was immersed in the
dry DMF solution (0.2 mM, 25 ꢂC) containing tetrabutylammonium
hydroxide (TBA, 0.2 mM) for dye loading onto the TiO2 film at
25 ꢂC for 4 h and 8 h. The Pt counter electrodes were prepared on
d
164.9, 152.5, 152.3, 150.6, 150.3, 150.1, 150.0, 148.6, 143.8, 141.4,
137.3, 137.0, 134.8, 134.5, 133.4, 133.3, 133.1, 131.9, 131.1, 130.8, 130.3,
130.1, 129.6, 129.0, 128.8, 128.7, 128.1, 127.8, 126.8, 126.1, 125.4, 124.5,
124.3,123.6,123.5,122.0,121.4,121.3,120.9,120.6,120.5,108.7,102.4,