1686 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 21, No. 9, 2010
Ikeda et al.
bacterial and viral adhesion, tumor cell metastasis, the regulation
of hormone and enzyme activities, and so forth (11). For
example, various membrane lectins mediate the sugar-ligand-
assisted endocytosis of complexes followed by complex dis-
sociation in the acidic environment of the endosomes (12).
Lectins also play an important role in delivering conjugates to
the right cellular compartment, such as the cytosol or the
nucleus. Since most carbohydrates are electrically neutral, the
undesirable interactions mentioned above can be avoided
through covalent conjugation with different types of biomol-
ecules. Thus, these biological activities and the chemical
properties of carbohydrates are useful in the development of
functional conjugates for drug delivery systems.
To date, several groups have reported the development of
methods to modify oligonucleotides with carbohydrates (13).
Conjugation of a reactive carbohydrate with an oligonucleotide
in solution is one of the major methods of modification (14).
For mass production, however, it is obvious that conjugation
on a solid phase during the synthesis of the oligonucleotide is
much more advantageous than conjugation in solution. One of
the most evident ways to incorporate a carbohydrate residue
into an oligonucleotide on a solid phase is to synthesize a
phosphoramidite derivative. If sugar-conjugated phosphoramid-
ite derivatives are newly prepared, the carbohydrate can be
introduced not only at the 5′-terminus, but at any site in the
oligonucleotide sequence (15, 16).
Few studies have been carried out on the modification of the
3′-terminus of the oligonucleotide, due to the rather complicated
modification reaction at this terminus. Adinolfi et al. have
reported the installation of a carbohydrate at the 3′-terminus of
an oligonucleotide (16). They used a protected carbohydrate
on a solid phase and synthesized the oligonucleotide from the
C6 position of the carbohydrate. To our knowledge, only Maier’s
group has developed the glycosylated solid support for the
synthesis of sugar-conjugated oligonucleotides, in which the C1
position of the carbohydrate is linked to the 3′ terminus of the
oligonucleotide. They prepared an oligonucleotide possessing
a carbohydrate at the 3′-terminus by using ε-aminocapronic acid
as a bifunctional linker. They prepared 1-ꢀ-aminocarbohydrate,
followed by condensation with protected ε-aminocapronic acid
(17). Recently, they developed another method (18) of conjuga-
tion based on the method previously reported by Reed et al.
(19). In their method, however, the carbohydrate has to be
converted to aminocarbohydrate before the condensation reac-
tion with the bifunctional linker, resulting in a complicated
reaction scheme for the preparation of the glycosylated solid
support. Accordingly, we tried to establish an alternative method
of modifying the oligonucleotide at the 3′-terminus with the
C1 position of the carbohydrate.
In this report, we describe our novel, simple, solid-phase
synthesis method of fabricating carbohydrate-oligonucleotide
conjugates modified at the 3′-terminus of the oligonucleotide.
We created a novel glycosylated solid support for efficient 3′-
terminus modification. In our method, a protected carbohydrate
is directly conjugated by the glycosylation reaction, without any
transformation. The modified oligonucleotide is much more
stable against enzymatic degradation. We also evaluated the
effect of the modification on the activity of siRNA. The gene-
silencing activities of the modified siRNAs were well retained
after the conjugation.
After stirring at room temperature for 1 h, benzyl bromide (306
µL, 2.6 mmol) was added and stirred at room temperature for
12 h. The reaction mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate and
saturated ammonium chloride. The organic solvent was washed
with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated. Purification
on a silica gel column with hexane-ethyl acetate gave
1
compound 2 (440 mg, 86%). H NMR (CDCl3, 270 MHz) δ
7.42-7.27 (5H, m), 5.63 (2H, s), 4.56 (2H, s), 3.64 (2H, d, J
) 5.8), 3.55 (2H, s), 2.34-2.17 (4H, m). ESI TOF/MS m/z:
[M+Na]+ 241.1769.
(1-(Benzyloxymethyl)cyclopent-3-enyl)methyl 2,3,4,6-tetra-
O-acetyl-ꢀ-D-galactopyranoside (3). Compound 2 (100 mg, 0.46
mmol) and 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-acetyl-D-galactose (179 mg,0.46
mmol) were co-evaporated 3 times with dry toluene and
dissolved in 4 mL of CH2Cl2. To the solution, boron trifluoride
diethyl etherate (84.9 µL, 0.69 mmol) was added. After stirring
at room temperature for 12 h, the reaction was quenched with
aqueous NaHCO3. The reaction mixture was extracted with ethyl
acetate. The organic solvent was washed with brine, dried over
MgSO4, and concentrated. Purification on a silica gel column
with hexane-ethyl acetate gave compound 3 (240 mg, 95%).
1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.38-7.27 (5H, m), 5.58 (2H,
s), 5.38 (1H, dd, J ) 2.4, 3.5), 5.21 (1H, dd, J ) 8.0, 10.5),
5.00 (1H, dd, J ) 10.5, 3.5), 4.53 (2H, d, J ) 2.9), 4.44 (1H,
d, J ) 8.0), 4.15 (2H, m), 3.89 (1H, dd, J ) 6.83, 2.4), 3.85
(1H, d, J ) 9.3), 3.50 (1H, J ) 9.3), 3.40 (1H, d, 8.7), 3.34
(1H, d, 8.7), 2.22 (2H, d, 11.7), 2.17 (3H, s), 2.14 (2H, d, 11.7),
2.06 (3H, s), 2.05 (3H, s), 2.00 (3H, s). ESI TOF/MS m/z:
[M+Na]+ 571.2296.
(1-(Benzyloxymethyl)-3,4-dihydroxycyclopentyl)methyl2,3,4,6-
tetra-O-acetyl-ꢀ-D-galactopyranoside (4). Compound 3 (240 mg,
0.44 mmol) was dissolved in acetone/H2O/acetonitrile (1:1:1,
v/v/v). To the solution, 4-methylmorpholine N-oxide (103 mg,
0.87 mmol) and osmium oxide-immobilized catalyst I (Wako)
(3 mg) were added. After stirring at room temperature for 12 h,
the reaction mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate and brine.
The organic solvent was dried over MgSO4 and concentrated.
Purification on
a
silica gel column with hexane-
ethyl acetate gave compound 4 in diastereomers (170 mg, 67%).
1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 7.37-7.32 (5H, m), 5.38 (1H,
d, J ) 2.9), 5.21 and 5.17 (1H, dd, J ) 7.4, 10.5 and J ) 7.9,
10.5), 5.01 (1H, dd, J ) 3.6, 10.5), 4.58 (1H, d, J ) 6.05),
4.48 (1H, d, 6.05), 4.47 and 4.39 (1H, d, J ) 7.4 and J ) 7.9),
4.17 (1H, dd, J ) 4.8, 11.2), 4.12 (1H, dd, J ) 4.4, 11.2), 4.00
(1H, m), 3.94 (1H, m), 3.86 (1H, m), 3.71 and 3.24 (1H, d, J
) 9.0 and 8.8), 3.44 and 3.22 (1H, d, J ) 9.0 and 8.8), 3.36
and 3.22 (1H, d, J ) 8.4 and 9.1), 3.30 and 3.20 (1H, d, J )
8.4, 9.1), 3.00 and 2.98 (1H, d, J ) 9.1), 2.48 and 2.44 (1H, d,
J ) 7.7), 2.17 (3H, s), 2.04 (3H, s), 2.03 (3H, s), 1.99 (3H, s),
1.88 (1H, dd, J ) 6.4, 13.8), 1.81 (1H, dd, J ) 9.1, 13.8), 1.76
(1H, dd, J ) 7.7, 13.5), 1.70 (1H, dd, J ) 5.2, 13.5). ESI TOF/
MS m/z: [M+Na]+ 605.6320.
(3-Acetoxy-1-(benzyloxymethyl)-4-hydroxycyclopentyl)meth-
yl 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-ꢀ-D-galactopyranoside (5). Compound
4 (470 mg, 0.82 mmol) was dissolved in 8.2 mL of toluene. To
the solution, acetic anhydride (114 µL, 1.2 mmol) was added.
After stirring at room temperature for 12 h, the reaction mixture
was extracted with aqueous 1 N HCl and ethyl acetate. The
organic solvent was washed with aqueous NaHCO3 and brine,
dried over MgSO4, and concentrated. Purification on a silica
gel column with hexane-ethyl acetate gave compound 5 (292
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
1
mg, 57%) in diastereomers. H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ
Synthesis. (1-(Benzyloxymethyl)cyclopent-3-enyl)methanol
(2). Compound 1 was synthesized according to a previously
reported method (20). Compound 1 (300 mg, 2.3 mmol) was
dissolved in 6 mL of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). To the
solution, NaH (140 mg, 2.3 mmol) in DMF (2 mL) was added.
7.37-7.22 (5H, m), 5.38 (d, J ) 2.8), 5.19 (1H, dd, J ) 7.8,
10.5), 4.99 (1H, dd, J ) 2.8, 10.5), 4.55 (1H, d, J ) 4.6), 4.5
(1H, d, J ) 4.6), 4.42 (1H, d, J ) 7.8), 4.22 (1H, m), 4.18 (1H,
m), 3.88 (1H, m), 3.76 and 3.37 (1H, d, J ) 9.0 and 8.4), 3.46
and 3.33 (1H, d, J ) 9.0 and 8.4), 3.35 and 3.29 (1H, d, J )