butylisonitrile leading to 12a (Table 1). In the absence of
promoters, the two components failed to combine, prompting
Scheme 2. Formation of Oxazoles from Isonitrile Educts
Table 1. Effect of the Lewis Acid Catalysts in the Reaction of
3a with tert-Butylisonitrile
entry
Lewis acid
temperature/°C
yieldb
a
b
c
d
e
f
AlCl3
ZnI2
0
0
0
–
27
48
66
49
55
69
ZnCl2
ZnCl2
ZnCl2
EtAlCl2
Me2AlCl
25
reflux
25
25
g
a Typical procedure: the Lewis acid (1-3 equiv) was added to a solution
of 3a (0.5 mmol) and of tert-butyl isonitrile (1.5 mmol) in THF. b After
column chromatography.
us to examine the effect of basic or acidic catalysts on the
reaction. Compounds 3 are sensitive to the action of bases.
Thus, exposure of 3a, with or without an isonitrile, to the
action of Et3N or K2CO3 at 0 °C in THF induced rapid
formation of intractable polymeric materials.
By contrast, particular halophilic Lewis acids were effec-
tive catalysts for the reaction (Table 1). No desired product
was obtained when the substrates were combined in the
presence of AlCl3, while ZnI2 afforded 12a in modest yield.
Better results were obtained with ZnCl2. The process became
more efficient at rt, while increasing the temperature to reflux
had an adverse effect. However, Me2AlCl at room temper-
ature proved to be superior to ZnCl2 in that it provided
cleaner products. Yields of the desired oxazole 12a were
highest when 3 equiv each of isonitrile and Lewis acid
promoter were employed.
This finding prompted us to examine the condensation
of various permutations of chloroglycinates and isonitriles.
Pertinent results are summarized in Table 2. It is apparent
that the reaction proceeds in uniformly satisfactory yield,
even though the yields of 2-methyloxazoles such as 12f
were consistently lower than those of its congeners.
Valine-derived chloroglycinate 3i provided the corre-
sponding oxazole 12i with no erosion of optical purity.
While at this time we favor (air-sensitive) Me2AlCl as
the promoter, the safer ZnCl2 enabled the conduct of
reactions that seemed to be amenable to automatization
using a system such as the Chemspeed robot. This
instrument, essentially a dispenser of liquids, would
combine THF solutions of ZnCl2, isonitriles, and chloro-
glycinates, and then perform an extractive workup and
purify the crude products by HPLC-MS.13
anoacetamide to an isocyanate.8 It is apparent from Scheme
2 that the hypothetical conversion of 3 into 12-13 differs
in outcome from other isonitrile-based avenues to 5-amino-
oxazoles. Accordingly, it would nicely complement such
alternative constructions. We also note that several other
methods for 5-amino-oxazole synthesis do not employ
isonitrile building blocks, relying instead on the cyclization
of R-amidonitriles9 and related reactions,10 on the cyclo-
dehydration of R-amido-amides,11 or upon Cornforth-type
rearrangements.12
The feasibility of the desired reaction was explored by
studying the condensation of chloroglycinate 3a with tert-
(6) (a) Sun, X.; Janvier, J.; Bienayme´, H.; Zhu, J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
877. (b) Janvier, P.; Sun, X.; Bienayme´, H.; Zhu, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 2560. (c) Janvier, P.; Bois-Choussy, M.; Bienayme´, H.; Zhu, J.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 811. (d) Wang, S.-X.; Wang, M.-X.; Wang,
D.-X.; Zhu, J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3615. (e) Yue, T.; Wang, M. X.; Wang,
D. X.; Masson, G.; Zhu, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6717. (f) Yue,
T.; Wang, M. X.; Wang, D. X.; Masson, G.; Zhu, J. J. Org. Chem. 2009,
74, 8396. Related reactions: (g) Pirali, T.; Tron, G. C.; Zhu, J. Org. Lett.
2006, 8, 4145. (h) Bonne, D.; Dekhane, M.; Zhu, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2007, 46, 2485.
(7) Wu, J.; Chen, W.; Hu, M.; Zou, H.; Yu, Y. Org. Lett. 2010, 11,
616.
(8) Daniel, M.; Rizvi, R. K.; Kaminski, J. J. Heterocycles 1987, 26,
651.
(9) (a) Cook, A. H.; Hunter, G. D. J. Chem. Soc. 1952, 3789. (b) Mandal,
S.; Li, W. T.; Bai, Y.; Shablykin, O. V.; Brovarets, V. S.; Drach, B. S.
Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2007, 77, 1308. (c) Carreiras, M. C.; Eleuterio, A.;
Dias, C.; Brito, M. A.; Brites, D.; Marco-Contelles, J.; Gomez-Sanchez, E.
Heterocycles 2007, 71, 2249. (d) Robertus, J. D.; Kerwin, S. M. Beilst. J.
1860-5397-4-26.pdf.
(10) (a) Golovchenko, A. V.; Pilyo, S. G.; Brovarets, V. S.; Chernega,
A. N.; Drach, B. S. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2005, 75, 425. (b) Golovchenko,
A. V.; Pilyo, S. G.; Brovarets, V. S.; Chernega, A. N.; Drach, B. S. Synthesis
2003, 2851. (c) Drach, B. S.; Mis’kevich, G. N.; Martynyuk, A. P. Zh.
Org. Khim. 1978, 14, 508.
(11) (a) Falorni, M.; Giacomelli, G.; Porcheddu, A.; Dettori, G. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2000, 3217. (b) Elliott, G. I.; Fuchs, J. R.; Blagg, B. S. J.;
Ishikawa, H.; Tao, H.; Yuan, Z.-Q.; Boger, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 10589.
Two aspects of this effort merit comment. First, the size
of the library thus generated was of no import at this
juncture. Indeed, our objective was to demonstrate the
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 17, 2010
3943