M. Alfaro Blasco et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 4679–4682
4681
In summary, we reported the first enantioselective biocatalytic
synthesis of (S)-monastrol, (S)-1, which has been realized by means
of an unexpected and unusual enzymatic resolution of a substrate
with a remote stereogenic center as the preferred route. Notably,
an easily available commercial biocatalyst can be used for this res-
olution as a key step. Currently extension of this new methodology
towards a technology platform for the enantioselective synthesis of
a broad range of derivatives of (S)-monastrol is in progress. In addi-
tion, based on this methodology enzymatic resolutions of other
types of racemic phenol esters bearing a remote stereogenic center
are also planned.
OH
O
O
NH
N
H
(R)-1
S
O
n-Pr
lipase from
O
C. antarctica B
O
48% yield, 66% ee
(CAL-B)
+
O
NH
water-CH2Cl2
(80:20 (v/v)),
O
n-Pr
N
H
S
pH 7, 25 °C, 25 h,
O
O
59% conversion
rac-3b
Acknowledgments
O
NH
The authors thank Jasmin Düring, Katharina Ritter and Eva
Zolnhofer for experimental assistance, and Evonik Degussa GmbH
and Amano Enzymes Inc. for generous supply with chemicals. A
scholarship for M.A.B. by the German Academic Exchange Service
(Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst, DAAD) is gratefully
acknowledged.
N
H
S
(S)-3b
31% yield, 97% ee
Scheme 4. Enzymatic hydrolysis of O-butanoyl monastrol, rac-3b.
References and notes
the hydrolyzed product (R)-1 in 48% yield and with 66% ee. The
remaining desired (S)-enantiomer, (S)-3b, was isolated after col-
umn chromatography in 31% yield and with a high enantiomeric
excess of 97% ee (Scheme 4).14 When starting from substrates of
type 3 bearing acyl moieties such as propanoyl (R = Et) and hexa-
noyl (R = n-pentyl) reactions also proceeded, but gave less satisfac-
1. (a) Mayer, T. U.; Kapoor, T. M.; Haggarty, S. J.; King, R. W.; Schreiber, S. L.;
Mitchison, T. J. Science 1999, 289, 971; (b) Maliga, Z.; Kapoor, T. M.; Mitchison,
T. J. Chem. Biol. 2002, 9, 989.
2. Review: Sarli, V.; Giannis, A. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 7583.
3. Gartner, M.; Sunder-Plassmann, N.; Seiler, J.; Utz, M.; Vernos, I.; Surrey, T.;
Giannis, A. ChemBioChem 2005, 6, 1173: with dimethylenastron
compound has been identified which is even more than 100-times more potent
than monastrol.
a related
tory results with
E values of 8
and 6, respectively.15 The
conversions of these reactions were 30% and 11%. Notably, a dra-
matic drop of reactivity was observed when the substituent at
the acyl moiety was an isopropyl group (R = i-Pr) as a representa-
4. Dondoni, A.; Massi, A.; Sabbatini, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5913.
5. Chen, X.-H.; Xu, X.-Y.; Liu, H.; Cun, L.-F.; Gong, L.-Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
14802.
6. Huang, Y.; Yang, F.; Zhu, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16386.
7. Biocatalysis in the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Industries; Patel, R. N., Ed.;
CRC Press: New York, 2006.
8. Synthesis of rac-1: A solution of 3-hydroxybenzaldehyde (0.15 mol, 18.32 g),
thiourea (0.15 mol, 11.42 g), ethyl acetoacetate (0.23 mol, 29.28 g, 28.46 mL)
and concd HCl (2 mL) in ethanol (85 mL) was heated under reflux for 6 h. The
reaction mixture was filtered and the solid residue was recrystallized from
ethanol twice to afford rac-1 in 69% yield (30.21 g). The synthesis was carried
out according to a protocol reported in: Lewandowski, K. J. Combinat. Chem.
1999, 1, 105.
tive for an a
-branched substituent (<5% conversion).15
Based on the encouraging result in the enzymatic resolution of
rac-3b we then focused on the subsequent cleavage of the
O-butanoyl moiety in (S)-3b in order to obtain (S)-monastrol,
(S)-1, as the desired final product. Although for such a non-enan-
tioselective hydrolysis ‘standard’ chemical hydrolytic methods
might be also conceivable, the presence of the second ester moiety
(ethyl ester) in the molecule (S)-3b, which should not undergo
hydrolysis, makes this step challenging. After a preliminary screen-
ing of base-catalyzed methods (using aluminum oxide or NaOH as
a base) was not successful (data not shown) we identified a non-
selective biocatalytic hydrolysis as the method of choice. This
method is based on the use of a lipase from C. rugosa, which
showed a high activity but low enantioselectivity (E value of 7)
for the resolution of rac-3b. At the same time, this enzyme does
not possess a (significant) activity for the hydrolysis of the ethyl es-
ter moiety of rac-1 and rac-3 (data not shown), thus making it
attractive for the desired non-enantioselective but chemoselective
hydrolysis of (S)-3b under formation of (S)-1. We were pleased to
find that, as expected, in the presence of the lipase from C. rugosa
the desired (S)-enantiomer of monastrol, (S)-1, was then formed
with a high conversion of >95%. After subsequent work-up (S)-
monastrol, (S)-1, was obtained in 98% yield and with a high enan-
tiomeric excess of 96% ee (Scheme 5).16
9. Reviews: (a) Gais, H.-J.; Theil, F. In Enzymes in Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Drauz,
K., Waldmann, H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2002; Vol. 2,
p 335; (b)
Bornscheuer, U. T.; Kazlauskas, R. J. Hydrolases in Organic Synthesis—Regio- and
Stereoselective Biotransformations, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2005; (c)
Liljeblad, A.; Kanerva, L. T. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 5831.
10. For remote stereogenic center recognition in enzymatic resolutions, see: (a)
Mizuguchi, E.; Takemoto, M.; Achiwa, K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4, 1961;
(b) Mizuguchi, E.; Achiwa, K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4, 2303; (c) Yang,
X.; Reinhold, A. R.; Rosati, R. L.; Liu, K. K.-C. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4025; (d)
Hedenström, E.; Nguyen, B.-V.; Silks, L. A., III Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13,
835; (e) Colombo, G.; Riva, S.; Danieli, B. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 741; (f) Hu, S.;
Kelly, S.; Lee, S.; Tao, J.; Flahive, E. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1653.
11. Synthesis of rac-3a: monastrol rac-1 (10 mmol, 2.92 g), acetic anhydride
(10 mmol, 1.02 g, 0.95 mL) and DMAP (0.20 mmol, 25 mg) were dissolved in
dried pyridine (5 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred for 3 h under reflux.
After cooling down the reaction mixture to room temperature and adding ice-
water, the mixture was stirred for 1 h at room temperature. Then diluted HCl
(0.1 M) was added until a pH of 2 was achieved. The mixture was agitated
overnight at room temperature and the resulting precipitate was filtered,
washed with water and recrystallized from ethanol to furnish rac-3a in 72%
yield (2.42 g).
12. General protocol for the screening of lipases for the hydrolysis of rac-3a: The
screening was carried out at 25 °C and using a Methrom titrino apparatus (with
an automatic titration unit). After dissolving rac-3a (1 mmol, 334 mg) in
CH2Cl2 (20 mL) and addition of water (80 mL) under formation of a two-phase
system, the corresponding lipase (100 mg) was added. The pH was kept
constant at 7 (by dosage of a solution of NaOH (0.21 M)). After a reaction time
of 25 h the reaction mixture was filtered and then extracted with CH2Cl2
(3 Â 60 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4 and the
solvent was evaporated. The resulting crude product was used for the
determination of the conversion (via 1H NMR spectroscopy) and
enantiomeric excess (via chiral HPLC chromatography).
O
n-Pr
OH
O
lipase from
O
O
C. rugosa
O
NH
O
NH
buffer-CH2Cl2
(79:21 (v/v)),
N
H
S
N
H
S
pH 7, 40 °C, 49 h,
>95% conversion
(S)-1
(S)-3b
13. Synthesis of rac-3b has been carried out in analogy to the synthesis of rac-3a
(see Ref. 11) using butyric anhydride (15 mmol, 2.37 g), a modified amount of
DMAP (0.21 mmol, 26 mg) and dried pyridine (8 mL). After recrystallization
from ethanol rac-3b was obtained in 42% yield (1.53 g).
98% yield, 96% ee
97% ee
Scheme 5. Synthesis of (S)-monastrol, (S)-1, via enzymatic hydrolysis of (S)-3b.