18
T. Kinuta et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 982 (2010) 16–21
obtained (Fig. 2). These two crystals did not contain any other mol-
ecules such as those of the crystallization solvent.
The colors of these conformational polymorphs were different,
as shown in Fig. 2. Solid-state diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) of
IIIA and IIIB were measured (Fig. 3).
As expected, the solid-state DRS of IIIA and IIIB were markedly
different; the absorption edges were located at ca. 520 and 570 nm,
respectively.
To investigate the chirality of these polymorphs, solid-state cir-
cular dichroism (CD) spectra of these crystals were measured by
using a KBr pellet. Only IIIA showed CD. The solid-state CD and
absorption spectra of IIIA, as shown in Fig. 4, indicate that IIIA
has chirality.
compound 3 has conformational and color polymorphs, each of
which exhibits different optical properties.
In order to study the structures of these polymorphs, X-ray
crystallographic analyses were performed. IIIA obtained from
diethyl ether solution was analyzed first. Its structure is shown
in Fig. 5. It is composed of only 3 without the crystallization sol-
vent. As expected, this crystal belongs to the chiral space group
P212121. The torsion angle is -65.9° [C(3)-C(2)-S(12)-C(13)], shifted
from the vertical value (Fig. 5a). In one crystal, all bromobenzene
rings incline in the same direction with respect to the naphthalen-
edione ring. That is, only one handedness of 3 exists in one crystal.
This chiral crystal is formed by the self-assembly of molecules of 3
through three types of interactions (Fig. 5b and c) [7]. One type is
Peaks originating from the naphthalenedione ring were ob-
served in the CD spectrum at 438 and 504 nm. The circular anisot-
CH–p interactions (2.63 Å, indicated by red A arrows in Fig. 5b),
and the other is benzene-naphthalene edge-to-face interactions
(2.88 Å, indicated by blue B arrows in Fig. 5b). Moreover, there
are one CH–O hydrogen bond (2.60 Å, indicated by black C arrow
in Fig. 5b) and one CH–S hydrogen bond (2.84 Å, indicated by black
D arrow in Fig. 5b).
ropy (gCD = D
OD/OD) factor of the Cotton effect (kCD = 504 nm) was
approximately 8.3 ꢁ 10ꢀ4. These results suggest that the achiral
The crystal structure of IIIB obtained from the CH2Cl2 solution is
shown in Fig. 6.
It is composed of only 3 without the crystallization solvent. This
crystal belongs to the achiral space group P–1. A characteristic fea-
ture of the structure is the presence of two independent molecules,
3a and 3b, which have different torsion angles around the sulfur
atom in an asymmetric unit (Fig. 6a and b, indicated in blue color
for 3a and green color for 3b). The torsion angles of these mole-
cules are 133.9° for 3a [C(3)-C(2)-S(12)-C(13)] and 124.6° for
3b [C(23)-C(22)-S(32)-C(33)]. This achiral crystal is formed by
Fig. 2. Photographs of crystals IIIA and IIIB. (For interpretation of the references to
color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
the stacking of these molecules along the a-axis through p–p inter-
0
actions (indicated by the red circle, 3.46 and 3.66 ÅA, in Fig. 6d) [8].
Moreover, there are three CH–O hydrogen bonds (2.36, 2.59, and
2.56 Å, indicated by red A, blue B, and black C arrows, respectively,
in Figs. 6c and 6d) and one CH–Br hydrogen bond (2.88 Å, indicated
by black D arrow in Fig. 6c) [7].
For comparison, the crystal structure of II is shown in Fig. 7.
This crystal belongs to the achiral space group P21/n. The tor-
sion angle is 159.5° [C(3)-C(2)-S(12)-C(13)] (Fig. 7a). 2 forms a
columnar unit (indicated by the red dotted rectangle in Fig. 7b)
0
along the c-axis through CH–
p (2.80 ÅA, indicated by red A arrows
in Fig. 7b) and CH–O hydrogen bond (2.39 Å, indicated by blue B ar-
row in Fig. 7b) interactions [7]. This achiral crystal is formed by the
self-assembly of this columnar unit (indicated by the0 red dotted
circle in Fig. 7c) through CH–O hydrogen bond (2.45 ÅA, indicated
by black C arrows in Fig. 7c) [7].
The two conformational polymorphs of 3 showed different opti-
cal properties. Therefore, the difference in the colors of crystals IIIA
and IIIB may be attributed to the different conformations or pack-
ing arrangements of 3 in these crystals. To verify this, excited
states of the molecules in IIIA and IIIB were calculated by the ZIN-
DO method [9,10]. The excitation energies of 3 in IIIA were calcu-
lated as 2.58, 2.63, 3.62, 4.07, and 4.12 eV, and those in IIIB were
calculated as 2.59, 2.67, 3.66, 4.11, and 4.15 eV. These values indi-
cate that the conformational polymorphs of 3 in IIIA and IIIB
should have similar energy absorption; however, the DRS spectra
indicate that the latter has lower energy absorption than the for-
mer (Fig. 3). Therefore, the reason for the difference in the colors
of IIIA and IIIB can not be explained simply on the basis of the
molecular geometry. It is likely that the excited states of 3 are af-
fected rather strongly by the intermolecular interactions in these
crystals.
Fig. 3. Diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) of crystals IIIA (red line) and IIIB (black
line). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is
referred to the web version of this article.)
In order to study the control of polymorphism and examine the
reversible switching between the two conformational polymorphs
(IIIA and IIIB) in bulk products, the polymorphism of 3 was inves-
tigated by X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) analyses. When crys-
tals IIIA were dissolved in the CH2Cl2 solution and crystallized,
Fig. 4. Solid-state CD and absorption spectra of crystal IIIA (KBr pellet).