Lu Liu et al.
COMMUNICATIONS
[2] a) X. Xu, Z. Shang, R. Li, Z. Cai, X. Zhao, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 8560; b) P. E. Georghiou, Z. Li,
M. Ashram, S. Chowdhury, S. Mizyed, A. H. Tran, H.
Al-Saraierh, D. O. Miller, Synlett 2005, 879; c) M. Med-
arde, A. B. S. Maya, C. Pꢂrez-Melero, J. Enzyme Inhib.
Med. Chem. 2004, 19, 521; d) G. Sello, F. Orsini, Mini-
Rev. Org. Chem. 2004, 1, 77; e) M. N. Bochkarev, Chem.
Rev. 2002, 102, 2089; f) J. D. Hoefelmeyer, M. Schulte,
M. Tschinkl, F. P. Gabbaꢃ, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002, 235,
93.
[3] For some recent selected reviews on the synthesis of
naphthalenes and their derivatives, see: a) C. B. de Kon-
ing, A. L. Rousseau, W. A. L. van Otterlo, Tetrahedron
2003, 59, 7; b) M. Brasholz, S. Sçrgel, C. Azap, H.-U.
Reißig, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3801; c) K. Tsubaki,
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 2179; d) I. A. Maretina,
Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2008, 78, 223; for some recent se-
lected examples on the synthesis of benzofluorenes scaf-
fold, see: e) J. Zhao, D. Yue, M. A. Campo, R. C.
Larock, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5288; f) Y.-B.
Zhao, B. Mariampillai, D. A. Candito, B. Laleu, M. Li,
M. Lautens, Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 1881; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1849; g) S. A. Shahzad, T.
Wirth, Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 2626; Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2588; h) R. S. Laufer, G. I. Dmitrienko,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1854.
In conclusion, we have developed a novel, efficient
and general route to polysubstituted naphthalenes
and benzo[a]fluorenols via ScACHTNUTRGNEUNG(OTf)3- and HOTf-cata-
lyzed benzannulation of 2-(2-alkynylarylidene)-1,3-di-
carbonyl compounds. For those substrates with R3 as
a phenyl group, the product selectivity can be tuned
by subtle choice of the catalyst. An unprecedented
process between alkynes and ketones was also ex-
plored, which may be useful for future synthesis
design. Further investigations on the scope, mechanis-
tic details, synthetic applications of this transforma-
tion are ongoing in this laboratory.
Experimental Section
Typical Procedure
[4] For some selected recent reviews, see: a) S. Kotha, S.
Misra, S. Halder, Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 10775; b) S.
Saito, Y. Yamamoto, Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2901;
c) K. H. Dçtz, P. Tomuschat, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1999, 28,
187; d) M. Lautens, W. Klute, W. Tam, Chem. Rev. 1996,
96, 49; e) B. M. Trost, Science 1991, 254, 1471.
[5] For selected reviews, see: a) V. Gevorgyan, Y. Yamamo-
to, J. Organomet. Chem. J. Orgnomet. Chem. 1999, 576,
232; b) Y. Yamamoto, J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7817. For
selected examples, see, c) N. Asao, K. Takahashi, S. Lee,
T. Kasahara, Y. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 12650; d) N. Asao, T. Nogami, S. Lee, Y. Yamamo-
to, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10921; e) N. Asao, H.
Aikawa, Y. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
7458.
To a solution of HOTf (0.015 mmol, 2.3 mg, 1.4 mL) in
CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was added 1a (0.3 mmol, 86.4 mg) at room
temperature. After being stirred for 5 min, 1a was consumed
completely as was determined by TLC analysis. After re-
moval of solvent under reduced pressure, the residue was
purified by column chromatography on silica gel (Rf =0.25,
hexanes: EtOAc=6:1) to give the desired product 2a as a
white solid; yield: 84.7 mg (98%); mp 75–778C (hexane/
CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d=8.26 (s, 1H),
7.90–7.96 (m, 1H), 7.80–7.86 (m, 2H), 7.56–7.62 (m, 1H),
7.41–7.52 (m, 5H), 2.73 (s, 3H), 2.41 (s, 3H); 13C NMR
(75 MHz, CDCl3): d=201.63, 199.81, 138.14, 137.05, 136.91,
134.01, 131.52, 130.63, 130.47, 130.28, 129.56, 128.86, 128.72,
126.32, 124.73, 29.88, 18.15; MS (70 eV): m/z (%)=288
(100) [M+]; HR-MS (EI): m/z=288.1153, calcd. for
C20H16O2 [M+]: 288.1150
[6] L. Liu, J. Zhang, Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 6209; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6093.
[7] For some selected recent examples, see: a) J. U. Rhee,
M. J. Krische, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2493; b) T. Jin, Y. Ya-
mamoto, Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5259; c) T. Jin, Y. Yamamo-
to, Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3137; d) T. Jin, F. Yang, C. Liu, Y.
Yamamoto, Chem. Commun. 2009, 3533; e) C. Gon-
zꢄlez-Rodrꢅguez, L. Escalante, J. A. Varela, L. Castedo,
C. Saꢄ, Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1531.
[8] CCDC 772729 (2p’) and CCDC 772730 (4) contain the
supplementary crystallographic data for this paper.
These data can be obtained free of charge from The
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the National Natural Foundation of China
(Nos. 20702015, and 20972054) and the Doctoral Fund of the
Ministry of Education of China (No. 20090076110007) for fi-
nancial support. This work was also sponsored by 973 Pro-
gram (2009CB825300).
Cambridge
Crystallographic
Data
Centre
via
References
[9] a) G. S. Viswanathan, M. Wang, C.-J. Li, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2139; b) G. W. Kabalka, Y. Ju, Z. Wu,
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7915; c) A. Saito, J. Kasai, Y.
Odaira, H. Fukaya, Y. Hanzawa, J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74,
5644; d) R. Balamurugan, V. Gudla, Org. Lett. 2009, 11,
3116.
[1] For a monograph on the chemistry of naphthalenes and
their derivatives, see: R. T. Mason, M. Talukder, C. R.
Kates, in: Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Tech-
nology, 4st edn., Vol. 16, (Ed.: R. E. Kirk), Wiley, New
York, 1995, pp 963–1017.
1924
ꢁ 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 1920 – 1924