peroxide.12 The generation of the analyte by the release and
enzymatic oxidation develops a chain reaction that results in
exponential amplification of a diagnostic signal. In this report we
showed that the distinctive pathway of the DCR amplification is
not limited to one analyte and can be extended to other reacti-
vities. The modular design of DCR probes allows us to introduce
detection capabilities for other compounds once the analyte of
interest that has cleavage reactivity toward a specific trigger would
be incorporated collectively with the specific triggering group. In
the sulfhydryl-based DCR system, the dendritic probe directly
releases the analyte of interest, a thiol, which can then initiate
additional diagnostic cycles. This is the first example of a DCR
amplification system that does not require any additional reagents
or enzymes in order to produce the chain reaction.
Notes and references
1 R. J. Amir, E. Danieli and D. Shabat, Chem.–Eur. J., 2007, 13,
812–821.
2 J. M. Nam, C. S. Thaxton and C. A. Mirkin, Science, 2003, 301,
1884–1886.
3 S. W. Thomas III, G. D. Joly and T. M. Swager, Chem. Rev., 2007,
107, 1339–1386.
4 Q. Wu and E. V. Anslyn, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
14682–14683.
5 L. Zhu and E. V. Anslyn, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45,
1190–1196.
6 C. M. Niemeyer, M. Adler and R. Wacker, Trends Biotechnol.,
2005, 23, 208–216.
7 V. Patzke and G. von Kiedrowski, ARKIVOC, 2007, 5,
293–310.
8 T. Sano, C. L. Smith and C. R. Cantor, Science, 1992, 258,
120–122.
9 K. Soai, T. Shibata and I. Sato, Acc. Chem. Res., 2000, 33,
382–390.
10 H. J. Yoon and C. A. Mirkin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130,
11590–11591.
11 M. Avital-Shmilovici and D. Shabat, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2010,
18, 3643–3647.
12 E. Sella and D. Shabat, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 9934–9936.
13 R. J. Amir, N. Pessah, M. Shamis and D. Shabat, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 4494–4499.
14 A. Sagi, R. Weinstain, N. Karton and D. Shabat, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2008, 130, 5434–5435.
15 E. Sella and D. Shabat, Chem. Commun., 2008, 5701–5703.
16 M. A. Swiderska and J. L. Reymond, Nat. Chem., 2009, 1,
527–528.
17 K. S. McCully, Nat. Med., 1996, 2, 386–389.
18 A. Meister and M. E. Anderson, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1983, 52,
711–760.
19 F. Michelet, R. Gueguen, P. Leroy, M. Wellman, A. Nicolas and
G. Siest, Clin. Chem. (Washington, DC), 1995, 41, 1509–1517.
20 X. Chen, Y. Zhou, X. Peng and J. Yoon, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010,
39, 2120–2135.
The addition reaction of the thiol-analyte to the benzo-
quinone moiety of probe 2 or dendron 3 occurs very fast
(time-scale of seconds). The rate-determining step of the DCR
sequence is the release of the thiol units from dendron 3. Thus,
almost any thiol compound is expected to present similar
kinetic behavior upon reaction with the 2CDCR probe system.
It should be noted that although there are more sensitive
probes for the detection of thiols, this study represents a
general route for achieving exponential signal amplification,
which is based merely on reactions of small molecules. The
DCR technique is particularly useful in circumstances when a
reporter molecule with relatively weak spectroscopic signal is
used. In such example the exponential amplification leads to
strong observable diagnostic signal despite a low extinction
coefficient (in the case of UV-Vis reporter) or a low quantum
yield (in the case of a fluorescence reporter).
In summary, a new two-component DCR probe system for
the detection of sulfhydryl compounds was developed. The
probe is activated by a thiol analyte through a stoichiometric
reaction to generate a chain reaction that exponentially amplifies
a diagnostic signal. Importantly, this demonstrates the advan-
tage of our modular design of the two-component DCR system
and shows that versatile reactivities can be incorporated in order
to achieve exponential signal amplification for the detection of
various analytes. Additional DCR probes for the detection of
other analytes based on different chemistries are currently being
developed in our lab.
21 J. Bouffard, Y. Kim, T. M. Swager, R. Weissleder and
S. A. Hilderbrand, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 37–40.
22 T. Fukuyama, M. Cheung, C.-K. Jow, Y. Hidai and T. Kan,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 5831–5834.
23 T. Fukuyama, C.-K. Jow and M. Cheung, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995,
36, 6373–6374.
24 S. T. Huang, K. N. Ting and K. L. Wang, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2008,
620, 120–126.
25 H. Maeda, H. Matsuno, M. Ushida, K. Katayama, K. Saeki and
N. Itoh, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 2922–2925.
26 P. D. Senter, W. E. Pearce and R. S. Greenfield, J. Org. Chem.,
1990, 55, 2975–2978.
27 E. Sella, A. Lubelski, J. Klafter and D. Shabat, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2010, 132, 3945–3952.
28 R. Erez and D. Shabat, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2008, 6,
2669–2672.
D.S. thanks the Israel Science Foundation (ISF) and the
Binational Science Foundation (BSF) for financial support.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 6575–6577 | 6577