tored by UV-vis, fluorescence, and NMR spectroscopy. The
UV-vis spectra (Figure 3) of both compounds showed the
Figure 4.
1H NMR spectral change of SiB1 during irradiation.
1
Similar H NMR spectral changes were observed for SiB2
(see Supporting Information). Solids of SiB1a and SiB2a
may be isolated from a pure oxygen-free hexane solvent.
Because of the lack of π-conjugation between the two
boryl units in the silyl diboryl molecules, this single-
chromophore isomerization phenomenon can be attributed
to a through-space intramolecular energy transfer from the
nonisomerized chromophore to the low-energy absorption
band of the isomerized chromophore based on Kasha’s
principle,9 which dissipates the excited state energy, thus
preventing isomerization of the second chromophore. Com-
plete fluorescence quenching was also observed as a con-
sequence of the energy transfer in SiB1. However, the
isomerized product of SiB2 has a weak emission peak despite
the reaction being quantitative, indicating that the larger
separation of the two boryl units results in weaker through-
space interactions.
The single-chromophore photoisomerization phenomenon
of the silyl-bridged boryl systems is in contrast to the
extensively studied dithienylethene (DTE) photochromic
system, where simultaneous photoisomerization of multiple
chromophores in a single molecule is frequently observed.10
For example, a silyl-bridged DTE dimer was found to
undergo multichromophore switching, reaching a photosta-
tionary state consisting of the nonisomerized, singly isomer-
ized, and doubly isomerized compounds, despite the presence
of a low-energy absorption band in the isomerized state of
the DTE system.11 This difference may be caused by the
much slower photoisomerization rate of the N,C-chelate boryl
compounds that cannot compete kinetically with the energy
transfer process. Efforts are being taken by us to determine
the rates of the various competing excited state processes of
the N,C-chelate boryl systems.
Figure 3. Changes in the absorption spectra (left) and emission
spectra (right) of SiB1 (top) and SiB2 (bottom) during irradiation
with 365 nm light. Insets: Photographs showing color changes of
the compounds before and after irradiation.
appearance and rapid growth of a peak at λmax ) 624 nm
for SiB1 and λmax ) 653 nm for SiB2 upon irradiation, which
is characteristic of the isomerized unit shown in Scheme 1.
However, the intensity of this peak relative to the largest
peak at the completion of isomerization was smaller for the
diboryl compounds: 32% for B1, 18% for SiB1, 20% for
B2, and 8% for SiB2. Thus, the spectral change of the diboryl
compounds is approximately one-half that of the correspond-
ing monoboryl compounds, indicating that only one of the
ppy-BMes2 groups likely undergoes isomerization in the
silyl-bridged dimers.
This was in fact confirmed by 1H NMR spectra. As shown
in Figure 4, the 1H NMR spectrum of SiB1 upon irradiation
shows the complete disappearance of the original pyridyl
proton signal, H1, at 8.83 ppm, and the growth of two new
peaks H1′ and H1′′, at 8.79 ppm and 8.67 ppm, respectively,
that retain a 1:1 ratio throughout the entire photolysis process.
The appearance of these peaks is accompanied by peaks H3
and H4 that integrate to one proton each and are characteristic
of the isomerized species. The peak ratios and integration
values unambiguously confirmed that only one boryl unit
undergoes isomerization, forming SiB1a quantitatively.
(3) Kawa, M. Top. Curr. Chem. 2003, 228, 193, and references therein.
(4) (a) Suzuki, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1982, 15, 178. (b) Miyaura, N.;
Suzuki, A. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 2457.
(9) (a) Kasha, M. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 1950, 9, 14. (b) Kaieda, T.;
Kobatake, S.; Miyasaka, H.; Murakami, M.; Iwai, N.; Nagata, Y.; Itaya,
A.; Irie, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2015.
(5) Grave, C.; Lentz, D.; Schafer, A.; Samor, P.; Rabe, J. P.; Franke,
P.; Schluter, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6907.
(6) The crystal data of SiB1 have been deposited at the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC 789494).
(10) (a) Irie, M. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1685. (b) Aubert, V.; Guerchais,
V.; Ishow, E.; Hoang-Thi, K.; Ledoux, I.; Nakatani, K.; Le Bozec, H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 577. (c) Areephong, J.; Logtenberg, H.; Browne,
W. R.; Feringa, B. L. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2132. (d) Areephong, J.;
Hurenkamp, J. H.; Milder, M. T. W.; Meetsma, A.; Herek, J. L.; Browne,
W. R.; Feringa, B. L. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 721.
(7) Wakamiya, A.; Taniguchi, T.; Yamaguchi, S. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2006, 45, 3170.
(8) Duffy, N. W.; Robinson, B. H.; Simpson, J. J. Organomet. Chem.
1999, 573, 36.
(11) Areephong, J.; Browne, W. R.; Feringa, B. L. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2007, 5, 1170.
5268
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 22, 2010