well explored. The number of potential, competitive metal-
locarbenoid reaction sites (indicated by f) in 1 has increased,
and the control of site- and diastereoselectivity in this system
poses an interesting and challenging question.
The Rh2(OAc)4-catalyzed reaction of the diazoamide4a 9 was
first tested to assess the regioselectivity of the reaction. It is
clear from Table 1 that γ-lactam formation is influenced by
Table 1. Rh2(OAc)4-Catalyzed Reaction of Diazoamide 9
relative yields (%)
entry
diazo
yield (%)a
10
11d
12
13
1
2
3
4
9a
9b
9c
9d
73
82
88
83
89b
34c
80b
78c
0
66
0
11e
0
0
0
20e
8
0
8
6f
a Combined isolated yields. Relative stereochemistry: t ) trans, c )
cis. b 10a, only t,t; 10c, t,t:t,c ) 15:1. c 10b, only t; 10d, t:c ) 20:1. d 11b,
t:c ) 1:1; 11d, only c. e Inseparable t/c diastereomers: 12a, t:c ) 4:1; 12c,
t:c ) 2:1. f Relative stereochemistry was unassigned.
An early study, reported by Zaragoza,2a is the Rh(II)-
catalyzed C-H insertion of R-diazoamide 2 (eq 1), which
occurred with poor regio- and chemoselectivity to give only
a low yield of the desired γ-lactam 3. The products 4 and 5,
which arose from Rh(II)-carbenoid attack at the N-benzhydryl
group, and the imine 6 were also obtained. To circumvent
this difficulty, Hashimoto and co-workers resorted to the use
of the 2,2-dimethyloxazolidine diazoamide (eq 1) 7.2b The
Rh(II)-catalyzed reaction of 7 preferentially led to the desired
γ-lactam 8, and this observation was subsequently further
developed by Jung and co-workers.2c
subtle electronic effects from the R-substituent on the carbenoid
carbon and the O-substituent of the oxymethylene group. With
9a (entry 1), preferential C-H insertion at the butyl group to
give the γ-lactam 10a was observed, and the ꢀ-lactam 12a,
arising from insertion at the N-CR-H unit, was obtained as a
minor product. It is intereting to note that the γ-lactam 10a
was obtained as a single diastereomer having the C3,C4-trans;
C4,C5-trans relative stereochemistry.4b The lactam 11a, which
could be formed via metallocarbenoid attack at the electronically
activated5a ether C-H bond, was not detected. In accord with
our previous results,3 the N-BTMSM group was inert under
the reaction conditions. Unexpectedly, with the unsubstituted
diazoamide 9b (entry 2), insertion at the ether C-H bond is
now favored to afford γ-lactam 11b; the γ-lactam 10b, obtained
only as the trans diastereomer, was the minor product, and the
ꢀ-lactam 12b was not detected.
To dissuade C-H insertion at the N-CR-oxymethylene
moiety, the O-MOM group was replaced with the O-pivaloyl
(Piv) group as in diazoamides 9c,d. It was reasoned that the
electron-withdrawing effect of the O-Piv unit would deac-
tivate the adjacent methylene C-H bonds toward metallo-
carbenoid insertion. Thus, reaction of 9c gave the trans,trans-
10c (major product) and ꢀ-lactam 12c (minor product) as
was observed for the reaction of 9a (entry 1). Interestingly,
We recently reported3 that the N-BTMSM group is a
practical, nonparticipatory N-protecting group which is
effective for controlling site selectivity in Rh(II)-catalyzed
reactions of tertairy R-diazoamides. We noted that the
N-BTMSM unit has a subtle but important influence on the
conformational preferences about the amide N-CR σ bond
in N-CR-branched diazoamides.3c Following this cue, we
initiated studies on the Rh(II)-catalyzed reaction of acyclic
diazoamides of type 1 (R ) BTMSM, Figure 1). We chose
the oxymethylene moiety as one of the CR-substituents as it
provides flexibility for subsequent functional group manipu-
lation in the context of synthetic applications. Herein, we
report the preliminary findings of our studies and demonstrate
the utility of the method in the synthesis of (()-R-allokainic
acid.
(4) (a) The preparation of the diazoamides will be presented elsewhere.
(b) Only the assigned relative stereochemistries of γ-lactams 10, 15, and
20 are provided here. The assignment of the relative stereochemistry of
γ-lactams 10, 15, and 20, the regioisomeric γ-lactams 11, 16, and 21, and
ꢀ-lactams 12 and 28 is based on a combination of the detailed analysis of
1H NMR J values, NOE, and X-ray crystallographic data of key products.
These analyses and results will be detailed elsewhere.
(2) (a) Zaragoza, F. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 8829. (b) Anada, M.;
Sugimoto, T.; Watanabe, H.; Nakajima, M.; Hashimoto, S.-H. Heterocycles
1999, 50, 969. (c) Jung, Y. C.; Yoon, C. H.; Turos, E.; Yoo, K. S.; Jung,
K. W. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 10114, and references cited therein.
(3) (a) Zhang, B.; Wee, A. G. H. Chem. Commun. 2008, 4837. (b) Wee,
A. G. H.; Duncan, S. C.; Fan, G.-J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17,
297. (c) Wee, A. G. H.; Duncan, S. C. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8372.
(5) (a) Wang, P.; Adams, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3296. (b)
Wang, J.; Chen, B.; Bao, J. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 1853.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 23, 2010
5387