Article
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2010, Vol. 53, No. 23 8351
of THF was slowly added, and the mixture was refluxed for 6 h
before being stirred at room temperature 16 h. The reaction
mixture was concentrated and basified with concentrated
NH4OH-H2O (1:1) to pH 10-11 and extracted with CH2Cl2
(3 ꢀ 25 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried
(Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated to give 1.23 g of product,
which was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel using
10% (Et2O-Et3N) (9:1) in 90% hexanes to give 0.39 g of 4c and
0.71 g (80% adjusted yield) of 4j. The 4j was crystallized from
petroleum ether to give 0.59 g of fine white crystals: mp 139-
141 °C. The product was converted to the HCl salt by adding
1 M HCl in Et2O to an Et2O solution of 4j. Recrystallization
(9:1) to afford 2.0 g (46%) of a mixture that was used without
further purification to prepare 4k.
Transporter Assays. The abilities of 2 and its analogues to
inhibit uptake of [3H]dopamine ([3H]DA), [3H]serotonin ([3H]5-HT),
or [3H]norepinephrine ([3H]NE) by the respective human trans-
porters were evaluated using the appropriate HEK-293 cell line
as previously reported.31
Cell Lines and Culture. Human embryonic kidney (HEK-293)
cells stably expressing human DAT, NET, or SERT were
maintained as previously described.31
Use was made, as previously described,33 of TE671/RD cells
naturally expressing human muscle-type nAChR (R1β1γδ- or
R1*-nAChR), SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells naturally expres-
sing human autonomic R3β4*-nAChRs (containing R3, β4,
probably R5, and sometimes β2 subunits), or transfected
SH-EP1 epithelial cells heterologously expressing either human
R4β2-nAChR, which is thought to be the most abundant, high
affinity nicotine-binding nAChR in mammalian brain, or R4β4-
nAChR.36,37
from MeOH-Et2O gave 0.467 g of 4j HCl: mp 278 °C (dec);
3
1
[R]D -110.2 °C (c 1.00, MeOH). H NMR (CD3OD) δ 7.66
(m 2H), 7.43 (m, 3H), 7.21 (d, 1H), 7.12 (s, 1H), 7.00 (d, 1H), 6.20
(s, 1H), 4.30 (m, 1H), 4.16 (m, 1H), 3.98 (m, 1H), 3.75 (m, 1H),
2.93 (s, 3H), 2.04-2.74 (m, 9H). Anal. (C24H27Cl2N2O) C, H, N.
3r-(4-Chloro-3-methylphenyl)tropane-2β-carboxylic Acid
Methyl Ester (4k) Tosylate. To Ni(OAc)2 (9.21 g, 0.037 mol)
in MeOH (50 mL) was added NaBH4 (1.4 g, 0.037 mol) in
MeOH (20 mL). Compound 8 (2.20 g, 0.0074 mol) in MeOH
(20 mL) was added followed by concentrated HCl (3.1 mL,
0.037 mol) in MeOH (5 mL). The black heterogeneous reaction
mixture was stirred at reflux for 17 h. The mixture was filtered
through Celite, and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo. The residue
was partitioned between Et2O and concentrated NH4OH-H2O
(1:1). The ether was separated, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated
in vacuo to give an orange oil. This oil was chromatographed on
silica gel, eluting with hexane-Et2O-Et3N (50:45:5) to afford
0.92 g (46%) of 4k as a colorless oil. To a solution of 4k in EtOAc
(25 mL) was added 1 equiv of p-toluenesulfonic acid in a minimal
amount of EtOAc. The resulting solids were separated by filtra-
nAChR Functional Assays. Cells were harvested, seeded onto
24-well plates, and subjected to 86Rbþ efflux assays as pre-
viously described.33 Specific 86Rbþ efflux was assessed as the
response to a fully efficacious concentration of carbamylcholine
alone less that in the presence of efflux buffer alone. Any
intrinsic agonist activity of test compounds was normalized,
after subtraction of nonspecific efflux, to specific efflux. Antag-
onism of carbamylcholine-evoked 86Rbþ efflux was assessed in
samples containing the full agonist at a concentration where it
stimulates 80-90% of maximal function. For studies of mech-
anism of antagonism, concentration-response curves were
obtained using samples containing the full agonist, carbamyl-
choline, at the indicated concentrations alone or in the presence
of a concentration of the test ligand close to its IC50 value for inhibi-
tion of nAChR function. Ion flux assay results were fit, using
Prism (GraphPad), to the Hill equation, F = Fmax/(1 þ (X/Z)n),
where F is the test sample specific ion flux as a percentage
of control, Fmax is specific ion flux in the absence of test drug
(i.e., for control samples), X is the test ligand concentration, Z is
the EC50 (n > 0 for agonists) or IC50 (n < 0 for antagonists), and
n is the Hill coefficient. All concentration-ion flux response
curves were simple and fit well, allowing maximum and mini-
mum ion flux values to be determined by curve fitting, but in
cases where antagonists had weak functional potency, minimum
ion flux was set at 0% of control. Note that because agonist
concentrations used for test ligand antagonism assessments
were EC80-EC90 values, not all of the data, even at the lowest
concentrations of test antagonist, approached 100% of specific
efflux as separately determined in sister samples exposed to fully
efficacious concentrations of agonist. Note also that it has been
repeatedly verified that functional parameters for nicotinic
ligands and mechanisms of their action as determined using
efflux assays are like those determined using whole-cell current
recording techniques.38
Behavior,. All animal experiments were conducted in accor-
dance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
guidelines.
Animals. Male Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mice
(weighing 20-25 g) obtained from Harlan (Indianapolis, IN)
were used throughout the study. Animals were housed in an
Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory
Animal Care approved facility, were placed in groups of six, and
had free access to food and water. Studies were approved by the
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Virginia
Commonwealth University.
Tail-Flick Test. Antinociception for pain mediated at the
spinal level was assessed by the tail-flick method of D’Amour
and Smith.39 In brief, mice were lightly restrained while a
radiant heat source was shone onto the upper portion of the
tail. To minimize tissue damage, a maximum latency of 10 s was
tion and dried to give 1.25 g of 4k CH3C6H4SO3H as a white
3
solid: mp 170-171 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, free base) δ 1.32 (t, J =
5.8 Hz, 1H), 1.59 (m, 3H), 2.10 (m, 1H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 2.32 (s, 3H),
2.46 (m, 2H), 3.32 (m, 3H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 6.95 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H),
6.98 (s, 1H), 7.25 (d, J = 5.5 Hz). Anal. (C24H30ClNO5S 0.25
3
H2O) C, H, N.
3β-(4-Chlorophenyl)tropane-2β-N-(30-amino-4,5-dimethyl-
phenyl Carboxamide) (6). To compound 5 (5.3 g, 0.0189 mol) in
CH2Cl2 (100 mL) was added oxalyl chloride (19.0 mL, 0.0378
mol, 2 M in CH2Cl2). The reaction mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 2 h, then concentrated in vacuo. The resulting
acid chloride was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (60 mL) and added to 4,5-
dimethyl-1,2-phenylenediamine (6.4 g, 0.0473 mol) in CH2Cl2
(50 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred, under nitrogen, for a
period of 17 h. The solvent was decanted from a gummy residue,
and 10% NaHCO3-CH2Cl2 was added. The organic layer
was separated, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated in vacuo to
give 5.4 g of a foam. This material was chromatographed on
silica gel, eluting with EtOAc and then EtOAc-CMA80 (1:1) to
afford 3.8 g (51%) of 6 as a yellow amorphous solid. 1H NMR
(CDCl3) δ 1.71-1.80 (m, 3H), 2.12 (s, 3H), 2.14 (s, 3H),
2.13-2.39 (m, 3H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 2.66 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H),
3.19 (p, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 3.40-3.60 (bm, 5H), 6.51 (s, 1H), 6.81
(s, 1H), 7.21 (s, 4H).
3r-(4-Chloro-3-methylphenyl)-2β-(30-methyl-10,20,40-oxa-
diazol-5-yl)tropane (8). n-Butyllithium (12.0 mL, 0.030 mol,
2.5 M) in hexane was added to 5-bromo-2-chlorotoluene (6.0 g,
0.0292 mol) in THF (50 mL) at -78 °C. The resulting creamy
white suspension was stirred for 15 min, and anhydroecgonine
oxadiazole (7) (3.0 g, 0.0146 mol) in THF (50 mL) was added.
The orange reaction mixture was stirred for an additional
3 h, allowing the mixture to come to room temperature. TFA
(3.9 mL, 0.050 mol) was added, the mixture was stirred for 15 min
and concentrated in vacuo. The resulting residue was treated
with concentrated NH4OH-H2O (1:1) (100 mL) and CH2Cl2
(100 mL). The organic layer was separated, dried (Na2SO4), and
concentrated in vacuo to afford 5.7 g of an orange oil. This oil
was chromatographed on silica gel, eluting with ether-Et3N