trans-Tetrahydrofurans by OH-Assisted Ru-Catalyzed Isomerization
There are three plausible pathways for this OH-directed
transition-metal-catalyzed isomerization:[6] an oxidation/re-
duction by a Ru-complexed α,β-unsaturated aldehyde fol-
lowed by 1,4-reduction,[7] an oxidative addition that gener-
ates a π–allyl ruthenium complex, followed by reductive eli-
mination,[6] or a stereoselective addition of [Ru]-H (or [Ru]-
D) leading to A, followed by elimination to B (Scheme 6).
Experimental Section
21/22: In a first flask, a solution of 20 (1.00 g; 5.88 mmol) in dry
CH2Cl2 (15 mL; dried with 4 Å MS) was degassed (freezing in li-
quid N2, then vacuum, then purging with N2. The process was re-
peated twice). A Schlenk tube was charged (in the glove box) with
Chaudret’s Ru catalyst (12.0 mg, 0.0294 mmol, 0.5 mol-%). The
contents of the first flask were added to the catalyst under N2. The
Whereas the two first processes occur with an intramolecu- reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature. After 15 min, all
starting material 20 was consumed. The formed lactol was treated
with Et3SiH (1.36 g, 1.86 mL, 11.7 mmol) and Amberlyst 15
(2.00 g). The mixture was stirred open to air[2b] for 45 min at room
temperature, filtered, concentrated and bulb-to-bulb distilled (oven
temp. 100–125 °C, 0.6 mbar) to afford 985 mg of 21 (GC: 30%), 22
(GC: 25%), and (Et3Si)2O (GC: 40%). Yield of 21/22: 59%. Flash
chromatography on SiO2 (50 g; cyclohexane/AcOEt, 95:5) afforded
445 mg of 21/22 (100% pure; 49%).[15]
[D2]-1 was prepared in the same manner as 1.[1] Yield from [D2]-3:
66%. Characteristic signals for [D2]-1: 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ = 3.83
(dd, J = 8, 8 Hz, 1 H; major isomer), 3.95 (m, 1 H, minor isomer)
ppm. 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ = 56.7 (t, J = 19.1 Hz, CD), 65.1 (d,
CH, t, J = 22.3 Hz, CD] ppm.
lar 1,3-H (or D) shift, the addition/elimination process con-
sists of an intermolecular H (or D) transfer.[8]
Because the Ru-catalyzed isomerization works with
either ether 6 or diol 3 as substrate, the intermediacy of an
enal is not required for effective isomerization (Scheme 2)
and the oxidation/reduction pathway is improbable. To dis-
tinguish between the other two pathways, a crossover ex-
periment was performed by submitting a 1:1 mixture of the
structurally very similar [D2]-3 and non-deuterated diol 10
to the Ru-catalyzed isomerization reaction. This resulted in
a significant amount of H/D-scrambling (Scheme 7). It can
therefore be assumed that the addition/elimination pathway
(via A and B; Scheme 6) is – at least to some extent – opera-
tive. Probably the catalyst first coordinates with the two OH
groups and with the C=C bond under concomitant re-
ductive displacement of one cyclooctadiene ligand. The re-
quired Ru-H(D) species necessary for entering the catalytic
cycle is then generated by the dehydrogenation reaction,
previously observed as a very minor pathway (see above,
formation of trace amounts of lactone 2).[21,22]
Characteristic signal for [D1]-11: 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ = 59.6 (t, J
= 19.0 Hz, CD).
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Spectral data for all new compounds.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. C. Mazet (University of Geneva, Switzerland) for
stimulating discussions and the gift of the BArF-modified Crabtree
catalyst.[4b]
[1] C. Fehr, I. Farris, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 7058; Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6904.
[2] a) G. A. Kraus, K. A. Frazier, B. D. Roth, M. J. Taschner, K.
Neuenschwander, J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 2417; b) M. C. Han-
sen, X. Verdaguer, S. L. Buchwald, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
2360.
[3] J. P. Wolfe, M. B. Hay, Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 261; L. Zhang,
S. A. Kozmin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6962; F. Villar, O.
Equey, P. Renaud, Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1061.
[4] a) L. Mantilli, D. Gérard, S. Torche, C. Besnard, C. Mazet,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5143; b) L. Mantilli, C. Mazet,
Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 4141; c) M. Krel, J.-Y. Lallemand,
C. Guillou, Synlett 2005, 2043; d) S. G. Nelson, C. J. Bungard,
K. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13000; e) T. Ohmura,
Y. Yamamoto, N. Miyaura, Organometallics 1999, 18, 413.
[5] M. T. Reetz, H. Guo, Synlett 2006, 2127.
[6] V. Cadierno, P. Crochet, J. Gimeno, Synlett 2008, 1105; H. Su-
zuki, T. Takao in Ruthenium in Organic Synthesis, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2004, pp. 309–315; R. Uma, C. Crévisy, R. Grée,
Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 27; R. C. van der Drift, E. Bouwman,
E. Drent, J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 650, 1.
[7] a) B. Martin-Matute, K. Bogar, M. Edin, F. B. Kaynak, J.-E.
Bäckvall, Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 5832; b) M. Ito, S. Kitahara,
T. Ikariya, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6172; c) P. Crochet,
M. A. Fernandez-Zumel, J. Gimeno, M. Scheele, Organometal-
lics 2006, 25, 4846; d) B. M. Trost, R. J. Kulawiec, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 2027.
[8] F. C. Courchay, J. C. Sworen, I. Ghiviriga, K. A. Abboud,
K. B. Wagener, Organometallics 2006, 25, 6074; D. V. McGrath,
R. H. Grubbs, Organometallics 1994, 13, 224.
Scheme 7. Crossover experiment with [D2]-3 and 10. Reagents and
conditions: (a) [RuH(η5-C8H11)2][BF4] (1.0 mol-%), CH2Cl2, room
temp., 30 min; then Et3SiH (2.0 equiv.), Amberlyst 15, room temp.,
1 h.
We are confident that this reaction will find broad appli-
cation and initiate new stereoselective Ru-catalyzed isomer-
ization reactions based on polar group assistance.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have developed a general access route
to trans-THFs (and trans-γ-butyrolactones), which are less
accessible than the corresponding cis-fused heterocycles.
[9] F. Bouachir, B. Chaudret, F. Dahan, F. Agbossou, I. Tkatch-
enko, Organometallics 1991, 10, 455; C. Chapuis, G. H. Büchi,
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6153–6156
© 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjoc.org
6155