6292
S. Gracia et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 6290–6293
PhCH2NMe3,Cl
H2 (20 bars)
Pd/C (5%)
K2CO3
NH2
R2
NO2
NO2
R2
)))
MeOH, 24 h, r.t.
30 min, r.t.
OH
OBn
R1
R2
R1
R1
O
OBn
O
R1 =R2 = Me
1b : 84%
R1 =R2 = Me
3b : Q
O
R
1 = Pr, R2 = H 1c : 98%
R
1 = Pr, R2 = H 3c : Q
MeO
O
OMe (1.1 eq.)
NaOAc (1 eq.), AcOH
2 h, 80°C
H2 (10 bars),
Pd/C (5%)
H
O
PPA
N
AcOH
N
N
30 min., r.t.
24 h, r.t.
OH
R1
R2
R1
R1
R2
R2
1 =R2 = Me
O
R
1 =R2 = Me
6b : 41%
R
5b : 47%
R1 =R2 = Me
R1 = Pr, R2 = H 4c : 73%
4b : 91%
R1 = Pr, R2 = H 6c : 91%
R1 = Pr, R2 = H 5c : 80%
Scheme 6. Synthesis of indolizidine 167B and derivative.
Intramolecular cyclization proceeded in good yield (76%) in the
References and notes
presence of polyphosphoric acid according to a modified procedure
originally reported by Dinsmore.13,14 Subsequent hydrogenation in
acetic acid of bicyclic adduct 5a in the presence of palladium on
carbon under 10 bar of hydrogen provided the indolizidine ( ) 6a
in excellent yield (Scheme 5).15
Hydrogenation was performed with good diastereoselectivity
under classical conditions. This stereochemical outcome is consis-
tent with addition of hydrogen to a chair-like conformation in
which the methyl group adopts an equatorial position. The diaste-
reoselectivity of the hydrogenation and the relative substituent po-
sition were evaluated by proton NMR and 2D correlations of the
crude reaction mixture. The 5-methylindolizidine 6a was obtained
in a five-step sequence from commercially available nitroethane
and benzyl acrylate in global yield of 54%. Using the previously de-
scribed strategy, other substituted izidines were obtained also in
five-steps bearing dimethyl in C-5 position 6b as well as indolizi-
dine 167B 6c (Scheme 6).16
1. (a) Daly, J. W.; Spande, T. F.. In Alkaloids Chemical and Biological Perspectives;
Pelletier, S. W., Ed.; Wiley and Sons: New York, 1986; Vol. 4,. Chapter 1, pp 1–
274 (b) Michael, J. P. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007, 24, 191–222.
2. (a) Edwards, M. W.; Daly, J. W.; Myers, C. W. J. Nat. Prod. 1988, 51, 1188–1197;
(b) Garraffo, H. M.; Spande, T. F.; Daly, J. W.; Baldessari, A.; Gros, E. G. J. Nat.
Prod. 1993, 56, 357–373; (c) Garraffo, H. M.; Caceres, J.; Daly, J. W.; Spande, T.
F.; Andriamaharavo, N. R.; Andriantsiferana, M. J. Nat. Prod. 1993, 56, 1016–
1038.
3. (a) Aronstam, R. S.; Daly, J. W.; Spande, T. F.; Narayanan, T. K.; Albuquerque, E.
X. Neurochem. Res. 1986, 11, 1227–1240; (b) Tsuneki, H.; You, Y.; Toyooka, N.;
Kagawa, S.; Kobayashi, S.; Sasaoka, T.; Nemoto, H.; Kimura, I.; Dani, J. A. Mol.
Pharmacol. 2004, 66, 1061–1069.
4. (a) Smith, A. L.; Williams, S. F.; Holmes, A. B.; Hughes, L. R.; Swithenbank, C.;
Lidert, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 8696–8698; (b) Zeller, E.; Sajus, H.;
Grierson, D. S. Synlett 1991, 44–46; (c) Holmes, A. B.; Smith, A. L.; Williams, S.
F.; Hughes, L. R.; Lidert, Z.; Swithenbank, C. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 1393–1405;
(d) Pearson, W. H.; Walavalkar, R.; Schkeryantz, J. M.; Fang, W.-K.; Blickensdorf,
J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10183–10194; (e) Cuny, G. D.; Buchwald, S. L.
Synlett 1995, 519–522; (f) Michael, J. P.; Gravestock, D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
865–870; (g) Peroche, S.; Remuson, R.; Gelas-Mialhe, Y.; Gramain, J.-C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4617–4619; (h) Ganapati Reddy, P.; Varghese, B.;
Baskaran, S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 583–585; (i) Varga, T. R.; Nemes, P.; Mucsi, Z.;
Scheiber, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 1159–1161; (j) Gourlay, B. S.; Ryan, J. H.;
Kuhakarn, C.; Seehasombat, P.; Jaipetch, T.; Pohmakotr, M.; Reutrakul, V.
Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 1663–1670; (l) Peng, Y.; Yu, M.; Zhang, L. Org. Lett. 2008,
10, 5187–5190.
Future efforts will be orientated toward the development and
use of organocatalysts able to induce enantiomeric excess during
the key step of Michael type addition of nitroalkane on benzyl
acrylate.
5. (a) Polniaszek, R. P.; Belmont, S. E. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4688–4693; (b)
Jefford, C. W.; Tang, Q.; Zaslona, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 3513–3518; (c)
Fleurant, A.; Célérier, J.-P.; Lhommet, G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1992, 3, 695–
696; (d) Jefford, C. W.; Wang, J. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 3119–3122; (e)
Artis, D. R.; Cho, I.-S.; Jaime-Figueroa, S.; Muchowski, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 2456–2466; (f) Nukui, S.; Sodeoka, M.; Sasai, H.; Shibasaki, M. J. Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 398–404; (g) Ahman, J.; Somfai, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 303–
306; (h) Ahman, J.; Somfai, P. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 9747–9756; (i) Lee, E.; Li, K.
S.; Lim, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 1445–1446; (j) Angle, S. R.; Henry, R. M. J.
Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8549–8552; (k) Weymann, M.; Pfrengle, W.; Schollmeyer,
D.; Kunz, H. Synthesis 1997, 1151–1160; (l) Michael, J. P.; Gravestock, D. Pure
Appl. Chem. 1997, 69, 583–588; (m) Chênevert, R.; Ziarani, G. M.; Morin, M. P.;
Dasser, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 3117–3122; (n) Back, T. G.;
Nakajima, K. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 261–264; (o) Chalard, P.; Remuson, R.; Gelas-
Mialhe, Y.; Gramain, J.-C.; Canet, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1661–1664; (p)
Back, T. G.; Nakajima, K. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4543–4552; (q) Yamazaki, N.;
Ito, T.; Kibayashi, C. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 465–467; (r) Ma, D.; Sun, H. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 2503–2505; (s) Guilloteau-Bertin, B.; Compère, D.; Gil, L.; Marazano,
C.; Das, B. C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 1391–1399; (t) Kim, G.; Jung, S.-D.; Kim,
W.-J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2985–2987; (u) Kim, G.; Lee, E.-J. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2001, 12, 2073–2076; (v) Yoda, H.; Katoh, H.; Ujihara, Y.; Takabe,
K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2509–2512; (w) Corvo, M. C.; Pereira, M. M. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 455–458; (x) Amat, M.; Llor, N.; Hidalgo, J.; Escolano,
C.; Bosch, J. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1919–1928; (y) Klegraf, E.; Follmann, M.;
Schollmeyer, D.; Kunz, H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 3346–3360; (z) Ganapati
Reddy, P.; Baskaran, S. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3093–3101; (aa) Ganapati Reddy,
P.; Gomathi Sankar, M.; Baskaran, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 4559–4561;
3. Conclusion
The synthesis of ( ) 5-methyl indolizidine 6a was achieved in
five-steps and an overall yield of 54% through a key step of Michael
addition reaction between nitroethane and benzyl acrylate. The
diastereoselectivity of the hydrogenation reaction was evaluated
to 88%. The proposed synthetic scheme is, for the moment, not
an enantioselective pathway. The synthetic approach developed
in our laboratory is closely related to the strategies developed by
Smith4a and Lazzaroni5ab for the access to izidines substituted in
C-5 position. This synthesis is quite attractive due to the short
length of the sequence (only five-steps in comparison with other
strategies reported in the literature4,5), the accessibility of the reac-
tants/reagents and can also focus on other C-5 substituted alka-
loids opening the wide range of functionality.
Acknowledgment
The Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche is
gratefully acknowledged for a grant to S.G.