Indolyne Experimental and Computational Studies
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 1
droxyindole 28 with isopropyl isocyanate, in the presence of
catalytic Et3N, afforded carbamate 34. Of note, conversion of
33 to carbamate 34 proceeds in 85% yield and requires only
one final chromatographic purification. Following the protocol
disclosed by Snieckus and Hoppe,19 carbamate 34 underwent
o-lithiation/silylation to provide silyl carbamate 35.20 Testament
to the outstanding ortho-directing ability of carbamates,21 the
relatively acidic C2 proton of the N-methylindole is not disturbed
in this process. Although initial attempts to elaborate silyl
carbamate 35 to silyltriflate 27 in a stepwise fashion were met
with difficulty,22 an efficient one-pot deprotection/triflation
sequence proved successful. Our optimized route to silyltriflate
27 can be carried out on multigram scale and proceeds in 63%
overall yield. To confirm that silyltriflate 27 would function as
a suitable precursor to the targeted 4,5-indolyne 29, silyltriflate
27 was reacted with TBAF in the presence of furan (24) to afford
Diels-Alder product 36 in 85% yield.
Scheme 2
A number of heteroatom- and carbon-based nucleophiles
undergo smooth reaction with indolyne 29, which indeed
functions as an electrophilic indole surrogate (Table 1). Treat-
ment of silyltriflate 27 with p-cresol in the presence of CsF led
to the formation of products 37a and 37b (entry 1). Similarly,
the use of aniline as the nucleophilic trapping agent provided
adducts 38a and 38b (entry 2),23 whereas trapping with
p-methylthiophenol afforded sulfur-containing products 39a and
39b (entry 3). With respect to carbon-based nucleophiles, the
use of a cyclic ꢀ-enaminoketone generated indole products 40a
and 40b (entry 4).24 Furthermore, trapping with potassium
cyanide afforded cyanoindoles 41a and 41b (entry 5). The latter
result is notable because cyanide has rarely been used in
nucleophilic addition reactions to arynes.25
A variety of formal cycloaddition processes involving in-
dolyne 29 were used to access several unique 4,5-disubstituted
indole derivatives (Table 2). For instance, reaction of benzy-
lazide and silyltriflate 27, in the presence of TBAF, provided
access to indolyltriazoles 42a and 42b in 86% yield via a formal
aryne cycloaddition (entry 1).26 Moreover, a formal [2 + 2]
cycloaddition provided indolylcyclobutanones 43a and 43b
(entry 2), whereas a variant involving cycloaddition followed
by fragmentation provided ketoesters 44a and 44b (entry 3).27
Of note, each of the examples shown in Tables 1 and 2 reflect
an interesting general preference for initial nucleophilic attack
at C5 of the presumed 4,5-indolyne intermediate 29 with
selectivity as high as 12.5:1 (Table 1, entry 2). An explanation
for this observation is presented in the latter part of this
manuscript.
model has led to the design of a substituted 4,5-indolyne that
exhibits enhanced nucleophilic regioselectivity.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of
a 4,5-Indolyne Precursor and Synthetic
Applications. To initiate studies, 4,5-indolyne 29 was selected
as our primary target (Scheme 1). If accessible under mild
reaction conditions, indolyne 29 could undergo nucleophilic
additions and pericyclic reactions to provide a range of synthetic
applications. We elected to utilize Kobayashi’s approach to
aryne generation14 and hypothesized that indolyne 29 could be
obtained from indolyl silyltriflate precursor 27. At the time of
our studies, routes to indolyl silyltriflates were not known15 but
could plausibly begin from commercially available hydroxyin-
dole derivatives (e.g., 28).
The synthesis of an appropriate indolyl silyltriflate proved
challenging, primarily because of the acidity of the C2 hydrogen
and the electron-rich nature of the indole ring.16 Nonetheless,
extensive experimentation led to the development of an efficient
route to silyltriflate 27 (Scheme 2). Commercially available
5-benzyloxyindole (33) was converted to hydroxyindole 28
following a known two-step sequence.17,18 Reaction of hy-
(18) 5-Hydroxyindoles can also be readily prepared by the classic Nen-
itzescu indole synthesis; for a review, see: Allen, G. R. Org. React.
1973, 20, 337–454.
(19) (a) Kauch, M.; Snieckus, V.; Hoppe, D. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7149–
7158. (b) Kauch, M.; Hoppe, D. Synthesis 2006, 1578–1589.
(20) For the selective C4 lithiation of a related N-silylated substrate, see:
Griffen, E. J.; Roe, D. G.; Snieckus, V. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1484–
1485.
(14) Himeshima, Y.; Sonoda, Y.; Kobayashi, H. Chem. Lett. 1983, 1211–
1214.
(21) Snieckus, V. Chem. ReV. 1990, 90, 879–933.
(22) Cleavage of the carbamate of 35 was routinely accompanied by loss
of the C4 silyl substituent under a variety of reaction conditions.
(23) Liu, Z.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 3198–3209.
(24) Ramtohul, Y. K.; Chartrand, A. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1029–1032.
(25) Scardiglia, F.; Roberts, J. D. Tetrahedron 1958, 3, 197–208.
(26) (a) Shi, F.; Waldo, J. P.; Chen, Y.; Larock, R. C. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
2409–2412. (b) Campbell-Verduyn, L.; Elsinga, P. H.; Mirfeizi, L.;
Dierckx, R. A.; Feringa, B. L. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 3461–
3463.
(15) Subsequently, Buszek reported routes to N-Me-C3-phenyl-substi-
tuted indolyl silyltriflates using a Fischer indolization strategy; see
ref 12b.
(16) The electron-rich indole was prone to undesired reactions at C3 and
protodesilylation at C4.
(17) (a) Stadlwieser, J. F.; Dambaur, M. E. HelV. Chim. Acta 2006, 89,
936–946. (b) Gwaltney, S. L.; Imade, H. M.; Barr, K. J.; Li, Q.;
Gehrke, L.; Credo, R. B.; Warner, R. B.; Lee, J. Y.; Kovar, P.; Wang,
J.; Nukkala, M. A.; Zielinski, N. A.; Frost, D.; Ng, S. C.; Sham, H. L.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 871–874.
(27) Tambar, U. K.; Stoltz, B. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5340–
5341.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 50, 2010 17935