6950
B. Das et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 6947–6950
Xu, H.-M. Anticancer Res. 2007, 27, 2439; (c) Geethangili, M.; Rao, Y. K.; Fang, S.-
was added a solution (3 mL) of acetic acid/water (7:3, v/v). The whole reaction
mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for 30 min and the solvents
were evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was mixed with water
(10 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 Â 20 mL). The combined organic
extracts were washed with brine (10 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4,
filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified
through silica gel (100–200 mesh) column chromatography (ethyl acetate–
petroleum ether) followed by HPLC (see Ref. 14 for details).
H.; Tzeng, Y.-M. Phytother. Res. 2008, 22, 1336; (d) Yang, L.; Wu, D.; Luo, K.; Wu,
S.; Wu, P. Cancer Lett. 2009, 276, 180; (e) Li, J.; Cheung, H.-Y.; Zhang, Z.; Chan, G.
K. L.; Fong, W.-F. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 568, 31.
10. (a) Nanduri, S.; Nyavanandi, V. K.; Thunuguntla, S. S. R.; Kasu, S.; Pallerla, M. K.;
Ram, P. S.; Rajagopal, S.; Kumar, R. A.; Ramanujam, R.; Babu, J. M.; Vyas, K.;
Devi, A. S.; Reddy, G. O.; Akella, V. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 4711; (b)
Jada, S. R.; Matthews, C.; Saad, M. S.; Hamzah, A. S.; Lajis, N. H.; Stevens, M. F.
G.; Stanslas, J. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 155, 641; (c) Jada, S. R.; Subur, G. S.;
Matthews, C.; Hamzah, A. S.; Lajis, N. H.; Saad, M. S.; Stevens, M. F. G.; Stanslas,
J. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 904; (d) Satyanarayana, C.; Deevi, D. S.; Rajagopalan,
R.; Srinivas, N.; Rajagopal, S. BMC Cancer 2004, 4, 26. article no. 26.; (e) Xu, H.-
W.; Zhang, J.; Liu, H.-M.; Wang, J.-F. Synth. Commun. 2006, 36, 407.
11. (a) Srivastava, V.; Darokar, M. P.; Fatima, A.; Kumar, J. K.; Chowdhury, C.;
Saxsena, H. O.; Dwivedi, G. R.; Shrivastava, K.; Gupta, V.; Chattopadhyay, S. K.;
Luqman, S.; Gupta, M. M.; Negi, A. S.; Khanuja, S. P. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007,
15, 518; (b) Chao, T.-H.; Lam, T.; Vong, B. G.; Traves, P. G.; Hortelano, S.;
Chowdhury, C.; Bahjat, F. R.; Lloyd, G. K.; Moldawer, L. L.; Bosca, L.; Palladino,
M. A.; Theodorakis, E. A. ChemBiochem 2005, 6, 133.
Andrographolide-14
a-O-succinate 6a: gum, 72% yield; IR (neat): 3425, 2938,
1739 cmÀ1 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): d 7.06 (1H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 5.94 (1H, d,
;
J = 5.1 Hz), 4.89 (1H, s), 4.56 (1H, dd, J = 11.5, 6.4 Hz), 4.53 (1H, s), 4.25–4.17
(2H, m), 3.93 (2H, br), 3.52–3.49 (1H, m), 3.33 (1H, d, J = 10.8 Hz), 2.74–2.64
(4H, m), 2.50–2.39 (3H, m), 2.00–1.96 (1H, m), 1.82–1.73 (5H, m), 1.30–1.13
(6H, m), 0.67 (3H, s); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): d 175.7, 172.1, 169.2, 150.9,
146.5, 123.6, 108.7, 80.2, 71.5, 68.0, 64.0, 55.7, 54.9, 42.4, 38.7, 37.5, 36.7, 28.7,
28.6, 27.8, 25.1, 23.6, 22.6, 14.9; ESI-MS: m/z 473.14 [M+Na]+. Anal. Calcd for
C
24H34O8: C, 63.98; H, 7.61. Found: C, 64.02; H, 7.56.
17. Ganguly, S.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Sarkar, A.; Chatterjee, M. J. Microbiol. Methods
2006, 66, 79.
12. (a) Deshmukh, M.; Chao, P.; Kutscher, H. L.; Gao, D.; Sinko, P. J. J. Med. Chem.
2010, 53, 1038; (b) Wu, Z.; Patel, A.; Dave, R.; Yuan, X. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2010, 20, 3851; (c) Schmid, B.; Chung, D.-E.; Warnecke, A.; Fichtner, I.; Kratz, F.
Bioconjugate Chem. 2007, 18, 702; (d) Dai, J.-R.; Hallock, Y. F.; Cardellina, J. H., II;
Boyd, M. R. J. Nat. Prod. 1999, 62, 1427.
18. Method of MTS-PMS cell viability assay: The anti-proliferative activity of
andrographolide and its analogues were evaluated in U937, THP1, K562,
NIH3T3 and L132 cells using MTS-PMS assay (see Ref. 17 for details). Briefly,
cells (2.5–5.0 Â 104/200
l
L) were seeded in 96-well tissue culture plates and
incubated with compounds (0–50
lM) for 48 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Following
13. Dai, G.-F.; Xu, H.-W.; Wang, J.-F.; Liu, F.-W.; Liu, H.-M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2006, 16, 2710.
treatment, MTS [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-
(4-sulphonyl)-2H-tetrazolium, inner salt] (2.0 mg/ml) and PMS (phenazine
14. HPLC was performed on RP C18 column (300 mm  7.8 mm, 7.0
l
m) using
methosulphate) (0.92 mg/ml) were added in a ratio of 10:1 (20 lL per well).
methanol/acetonitrile/water/acetic acid (49:10:40:1 or 34:10:55:1) as mobile
phase; flow rate = 3 ml/min; tR = 6.8, 8.9, 16.9, 17.2, 17.8 and 18.4 min (for
compounds 6a, 6b, 9a, 9b, 13a and 13b, respectively).
After incubation for 3 h at 37 °C, the resulting absorbances at 490 nm were
measured in an ELISA reader. The specific absorbance that represented
formazan production was calculated by subtraction of background
absorbance from total absorbance. The mean % viability was calculated as
follows: Mean specific absorbance of treated cells  100/Mean specific absorbance
of untreated cells
The results were expressed as IC50 values, that is, the concentration that
inhibited 50% of cell growth, enumerated by graphic extrapolation using Graph
pad prism software (version 5).
15. All the synthesized final analogues were generally preserved at 0 to À4 °C and
remained stable for months. Even allowing them to stand at rt for several
weeks did not lead to any decomposition (HPLC analysis). Besides, few of the
final analogues (6a, 9a, 11a–b, 13a) were found to be soluble in chloroform but
all of them were fairly soluble in methanol and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as
well.
16. General procedure for the synthesis of acid 5/8/10/12 (step iii): To a well stirred
solution of compound 2/3 (0.512 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (8 mL) were
added acid anhydride 4/7 (0.615 mmol) and a catalytic amount (4 mg) of 4-
dimethylamino-pyridine (DMAP). The whole mixture was stirred under argon
atmosphere at room temperature for 4–6 h. The solvent was evaporated under
reduced pressure and the residue was purified through silica gel (100–200
mesh) column chromatography (ethyl acetate–petroleum ether) to afford the
desired product 5/8/10/12.
19. (a) Kundu, N. G.; Dasgupta, S. K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1 1993, 2657; (b)
Finer-Moore, J. S.; Montfort, W. R.; Stroud, R. M. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 6977;
(c) Hardy, L. W.; Finer-Moore, J. S.; Montfort, W. R.; Jones, M. O.; Santi, D. V.;
Stroud, R. M. Science 1987, 235, 448.
20. Flow cytometric analysis: Double staining for Annexin V-FITC and propidium
iodide (PI) was performed. Briefly, U937 cells were incubated without or with
6a (IC50 = 5.47 lM) for 24 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cells were then washed twice in
phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 0.02 M, pH 7.2) and resuspended in Annexin-V
binding buffer (10 mM HEPES, 140 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4). Annexin
V-FITC and propidium iodide were then added according to the manufacturer’s
instructions and incubated for 15 min in the dark at 25 °C. Data was acquired
3,19-Isopropylideneandrographolide-14-
a-O-succinate 5a: gum, 36% yield; IR
(neat): 3421, 2936, 1738, 1676 cmÀ1 1H NMR (CD3OD, 300 MHz): d 6.98 (1H, t,
;
J = 6.3 Hz), 6.04 (1H, d, J = 5.1 Hz), 4.93 (1H, s), 4.63–4.57 (2H, m), 4.30 (1H, d,
J = 11.1 Hz), 4.04 (1H, d, J = 11.7 Hz), 3.54–3.51 (1H, m), 3.20 (1H, d,
J = 11.7 Hz), 2.64 (4H, s), 2.57–2.52 (2H, m), 2.47–2.43 (1H, m), 2.07–1.97
(3H, m), 1.83–1.78 (3H, m), 1.41 (3H, s), 1.36–1.28 (6H, m), 1.22 (3H, s), 0.98
(3H, s); 13C NMR (CD3OD, 75 MHz): d 175.5, 173.6, 171.4, 151.7, 149.0, 125.6,
109.3, 100.3, 78.0, 73.1, 69.5, 64.9, 57.1, 53.4, 39.5, 38.9, 38.7, 35.5, 29.9, 29.6,
27.5, 26.5, 26.2, 25.7, 24.3, 16.5; ESI-MS: m/z 513.01 [M+Na]+. Anal. Calcd for
using
a FACS Calibur flow cytometer and analyzed with Cell Quest Pro
software.
21. Confocal microscopy: Apoptotic cells were characterized by nuclear
condensation of chromatin and/or nuclear fragmentation. Briefly, U937 cells
were incubated with an IC50 concentration (5.47
with ice cold PBS and stained with Hoechst 33258 (10
were mounted on poly -lysine coated slides and analyzed in a laser scanning
l
M) of 6a (for 24 h), washed
lg/ml, 30 min). The cells
C27H38O8: C, 66.10; H, 7.81. Found: C, 66.04; H, 7.86.
L
General procedure for the synthesis of acid 6/9/11/13 (step iv): To a well stirred
solution of ester intermediate 5/8/10/12 (0.50 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (3 mL)
confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP2 system, Leica microsystem, Heidelberg,
Germany; 100Â). At least 20 microscopic fields were observed for each sample.