kinetic spiroketal epimer could be equilibrated to the
corresponding thermodynamic epimer spiroketal 8 (>1:2)
with a protic acid.8 A short time thereafter, Fu¨rstner reported
the synthesis of berkelic acid methyl ester 12 by coupling
three separate chiral components together. Their observations
led to the revision of three stereocenters and an assignment
of the relative stereochemistry including the quaternary
stereocenter (Figure 1).9 This landmark effort paved the way
Scheme 1. An Early Retrosynthetic Plan
Figure 1. Subsequent revisions by Fu¨rstner and Snider.
for future synthetic successes, and soon afterward, Snider
reported the first total synthesis establishing the absolute
structure of berkelic acid as its enantiomer (-)-1'.10 The
Snider synthesis, which involved an acid-catalyzed coupling
of two chiral components followed by late-stage chromato-
graphic resolution of the quaternary center, is masterful in
its overall efficiency. Sometime later, De Brabander reported
a biomimetic total synthesis combining spicifernin and
pulvilloric acid surrogates.11
inverse demand Diels-Alder reaction with an o-quinone
methide (o-QM) 4 generated at low temperature using our
magnesium base-triggering methods in conjunction with
various o-OBoc compounds 7.5
Hence, we began by devising a short synthesis of exocyclic
enol ethers (5a-c) derived from γ-lactone 9, which could
be produced later in the desired enantiomeric form (Scheme
2).6 These enol ethers were then evaluated in conjunction
These successes and structural revisions forced us to
reevaluate our strategy with the prime intention of preserving
our initial diastereoselective approach. While we remained
confident that enol ethers 5a-c would react to form chroman
spiroketals,12 we needed to redesign our o-QM precursor so
that a new substituent could be elaborated into the desired
tetracycle. We postulated that compound 17 might prove to
be a novel o-QM precursor participating in our base-
triggering procedure and thereby lead to the o-QM carboxy-
late 16 and the spiroketal 15 (Scheme 3). Unfortunately, the
cycloaddition was expected to afford the kinetic diastereomer.
Although our prior equilibration studies were encouraging,
the final (2:1) ratio would be a challenge to improve.
However, we hoped that the added carboxylic acid residue
and aryl iodide might bolster the ratio afforded by a
thermodynamic equilibration. While the specifics of the
sequence needed for isobenzopyran formation remained
Scheme 2. Construction of Enol Ether Coupling Partners
with assorted o-QM precursors 7 (R′′ ) -H; X ) -H, -Br;
R′ ) -Me, -Bn) using our standard magnesium base-
triggering methodology.
Our early experiments showed that the low temperature
cycloaddition afforded what we believed to be the desired
relative stereochemistry, whereby the methyl residue in the
enol ether had controlled the spiroketal stereocenter (>4:1)
in compound 3.7 We further observed and reported that this
(7) Marsini, M. A.; Huang, Y.; Lindsey, C. C.; Wu, K.-L.; Pettus,
T. R. R. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1477.
(8) Huang, Y.; Pettus, T. R. R. Synlett 2008, 1353.
(9) (a) Buchgraber, P.; Snaddon, T. N.; Wirtz, C.; Mynott, R.; Goddard,
R.; Fu¨rstner, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8450. (b) Snaddon, T. N.;
Buchgraber, P.; Schulthoff, S.; Wirtz, C.; Mynott, R.; Fu¨rstner, A.
Chem.sEur. J. 2010, 16, 12133.
(10) (a) Wu, X.; Zhou, J.; Snider, B. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 1283. (b) Wu, X.; Zhou, J.; Snider, B. B. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74,
6245.
(5) (a) Selenski, C.; Pettus, T. R. R. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 9196. (b)
Jones, R. M.; Van de Water, R. W.; Lindsey, C. C.; Pettus, T. R. R. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3435.
(11) Bender, C. F.; Yoshimoto, F. K.; Paradise, C. L.; De Brabander,
J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11350.
(12) Compound 5b was made by Snider and coworkers in enantiopure
form by 1,4-addition of metallated chiral phosphoramides: see ref 10a and
Hanessian, S.; Gomtsyan, A.; Malek, N. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 5623.
(6) See Supporting Information and Pirrung, M. C.; Dunlap, S. E.;
Trinks, U. P. HelV. Chim. Acta 1989, 72, 1301.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 1, 2011
119