more practical alternative. Herein, we report an efficient,
flexible, and operationally reliable four-step synthesis of
trans-3-substituted prolines of type 2 following the strategy
shown in Scheme 1.
lines 3a/b in an efficient and reliable fashion on a 50 g scale
(Scheme 2).
Our concept is based on the consideration that the
substituent R could be introduced to a N-protected 2,3-
dehydroproline ester of type 3 by means of a Cu-catalyzed
1,4-addition. The trans-configuration should result from a
diastereoselective protonation of the initially formed eno-
late.10 As a precondition for the overall success, an efficient
access to the required 2,3-dehydroprolines of type 3 from
proline (4) is required. In principle, this method also allows
the preparation of nonracemic compounds by either employ-
ing a chirally modified substrate or by performing the 1,4-
addition in a catalytic enantioselective fashion.11
Scheme 2
.
One-Pot Synthesis of 3a/b (Moc ) Methoxy
Carbonyl)
Initially, we synthesized the dehydroprolines 3a/b
according to the most common literature protocol. Thus,
esterification of 4 (MeOH, SOCl2, 100%)12 and workup
of the crude hydrochloride 5 with NEt3 in ether gave rise
to the methyl ester 6 in 75% yield after distillation.
Oxidation of 6 with tBuOCl13 with concomitant elimina-
tion of HCl according to Ha¨usler14a then afforded the 1,2-
dehydroproline 8 in 81% yield, again after distillation.
Finally, treatment of 8 with Cbz-Cl or Moc-Cl in the
presence of pyridine in CH2Cl2 delivered the 2,3-dehy-
As a major change, we replaced the light-sensitive and
dangerous tBuOCl by inexpensive NCS.15 Due to its lower
oxidation power this reagent allowed us to perform the
reaction in the presence of NEt3, which is a sufficiently strong
base to directly induce HCl elimination (7 to 8). For this
purpose, the crude hydrochloride 5 was dissolved in CH2Cl2
and treated with NEt3 (2 equiv) prior to the portionwise
addition of NCS. The resulting imine 8 was then converted
to the N-protected enamine (3a/3b) simply by addition of
Moc-Cl (or Cbz-Cl, respectively) and pyridine.16 It proved
to be crucial to use a 2-fold excess of both the chloroformiate
(PG-Cl) and the base (pyridine) because the succinimide
(formed from NCS) also consumes 1 equiv of the chloro-
formiate to give 9.17 In comparison to the literature method14
our one-pot protocol (Scheme 2) affords the dehydroprolines
3a/b in greatly improved overall yield from proline (77%
of 3a, 90% of 3b after chromatography) and could be
performed in the air using technical-grade solvents and
reagents.18
droprolines 3a/b in typical yields of 50 to 70%.12b
c
However, despite reasonable high overall yields from
proline (30% for 3a, and 54% for 3b) the method did not
satisfy our demands for practicability.
Fortunately, we succeeded in developing a greatly im-
proved one-pot procedure (see below), which allows direct
conversion of the crude hydrochloride 5, obtained in
quantitative yield from 4 (see above), into the dehydropro-
(6) (a) Chung, J. Y. L.; Wasicak, J. T.; Arnold, W. A.; May, C. S.;
Nadzan, A. M.; Holladay, M. W. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 270-275. Further
examples: ref 3b-c.
(7) Recent variants of this method exploit an organocatalytic key step:
(a) Rios, H. R.; Ibrahem, I.; Vesely, J.; Sunde´n, H.; Co´rdova, A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2007, 48, 8695–8699. (b) Merck & Co., Emerson, K. M.; Ho, G.-J.
Chem. Abstr. 2000, 134, 86538.
(8) For other syntheses of compounds of type 2, see: (a) Soloshonok,
V. A.; Ueki, H.; Tiwari, R.; Cai, C.; Hruby, V. J. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
4984–4990. (b) Kanemasa, S.; Tatsukawa, A.; Wada, E. J. Org. Chem. 1991,
56, 2875–2874. (c) Damour, D.; Pulicani, J.-P.; Vuilhorgne, M.; Mignani,
S. Synlett 1999, 786–788.
Having developed a comfortable access to the dehydro-
prolines 3a/b, we next investigated the Cu-catalyzed 1,4-
addition of Grignard reagents to these compounds. Following
an established protocol19 we treated 3a with 1.5 equiv of
vinyl-MgBr in the presence of 0.3 equiv of CuBr·SMe2 at
-30 °C in THF. Under these conditions the product rac-
(9) (a) Ball, L.; Ku¨hne, R.; Schneider-Mergner, J.; Oschkinat, H. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2852–2869. (b) Freund, C.; Schmalz, H.-G.; Sticht,
J.; Ku¨hne, R. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2008, 186, 407–429.
(10) For noncatalytic 1,4-additions to substituted dehydroprolines, see:
(a) Ezquerra, J.; Escribano, A.; Rubio, A.; Remuififin, M. J.; Vaquero, J. J.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 2613–2626. (b) Toyooka, N.; Okumura,
M.; Himiyama, T.; Nakazawa, A.; Nemoto, H. Synlett 2003, 55–58.
(11) Reviews: (a) Schmalz, H.-G. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis,
Vol. 4; Trost, M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; pp 199-236.
(b) Rossiter, B. E.; Swingle, N. M. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92, 711–806. (c)
Alexakis, A.; Ba¨ckvall, J. E.; Krause, N.; Pamies, O.; Die´guez, M. Chem.
ReV. 2008, 108, 2796–2823. (d) Lopez, F.; Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa, B. L.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 179–188. For a recent contribution from this
laboratory, see: (e) Robert, T.; Velder, J.; Schmalz, H.-G. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7718–7721.
(15) For the NCS-oxidation of amines to N-chloroamines, see: (a)
Furneaux, R. H.; Limberg, G.; Tyler, P. C.; Schramm, V. L. Tetrahedron
1997, 53, 2915–2930. (b) Haeberli, A.; Leumann, C. J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
489–492.
(16) Neither NEt3 nor pyridine could be replaced by each other. Pyridine
proved not to be basic enough to induce HCl elimination (7 to 8) while we
assume pyridine to act as a catalyst in the acylation of 8.
(17) With 1.5 equiv of Cbz-Cl/pyridine the yield of 3a dropped to
30%.
(12) (a) Webb, R. G.; Haskell, M. W.; Stammer, C. H. J. Org. Chem.
1969, 34, 576–580. (b) Guttmann, S. HelV. Chim. Acta 1961, 85, 721–744.
(13) Peparation: Mintz, M. J.; Walling, C. Org. Synth. 1969, 49, 9–12.
(14) (a) Ha¨usler, J. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1981, 1073–1088. (b) Shin, C.;
Takahashi, N.; Yonezawa, Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1990, 38, 2020–2023.
(c) Purvis, M. B.; LeFevre, J. W.; Jones, V. L.; Kingston, D. G. I.; Biot,
A. M.; Gossole´, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5931–5935.
(18) For other (operationally less attractive) entries to dehydroproline
analogs of type 3 involving the oxidation of N-protected proline esters, see
ref 10a (LiHMDS, PhSeCl) or Kublitskii, V. S.; Stepanov, A. E.; Trukhan,
V. M. Russian J. Org. Chem. 2008, 44, 933–934 (LiHMDS, Br2).
(19) Quinkert, G.; Schmalz, H.-G.; Walzer, E.; Gross, S.; Kowa1czyk-
Przewloka, T.; Schierloh, C.; Du¨rner, G.; Bats, J. W.; Kessler, H. Liebigs.
Ann. Chem. 1988, 283–315.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 2, 2011
217